Persistence and degrading activity of free and immobilised allochthonous bacteria during bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils

Biodegradation

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-11

  Rivelli, Valentina ^a   Franzetti, Andrea ^a   Gandolfi, Isabella ^a   Cordoni, Sergio ^b   Bestetti, Giuseppina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b GioEco srl   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bioaugmentation; Biodegradation; Corncob; Pseudomonas; Rhodococcus; T RFLP analysis

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELL IMMOBILIZATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS; HYDROCARBONS; RNA; SOILS;

BIO-AUGMENTATION; CORNCOB; PSEUDOMONAS; RHODOCOCCUS; T-RFLP ANALYSIS;

SOIL POLLUTION;

BACTERIUM; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; CELL ORGANELLE; GENE EXPRESSION; HYDROCARBON; IMMOBILIZATION; MATRIX; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLYMORPHISM; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL REMEDIATION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS; PSEUDOMONAS SP.; RHODOCOCCUS; RHODOCOCCUS SP.;

EID: 84872893678     PISSN: 09239820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10532-012-9553-x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim SH, Paul EA (2003) Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data analysis for quantitative comparison of microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 926-932.
2. Boopathy R (2000) Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresource Technol 74: 63-67.
3. de Carvalho CCCR, Wick LY, Heipieper HJ (2009) Cell wall adaptations of planktonic and biofilm Rhodococcus erythropolis cells to growth on C5 to C16 n-alkane hydrocarbons. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82: 311-320.
4. Cassidy MB, Lee H, Trevors JT (1996) Environmental applications of immobilized microbial cells: A review. J Ind Microbiol Biot 16(2): 79-101.
5. El Fantorussi S, Aghatos SN (2005). Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation? Curr Opin in Microbiol 8: 268-275.
6. Franzetti A, Caredda P, Ruggeri C, La Colla P, Tamburini E, Papacchini M, Bestetti G (2009) Potential applications of surface active compounds by Gordonia sp. strain BS29 in soil remediation technologies. Chemosphere 75: 810-807.
7. Gandolfi I, Sicolo M, Franzetti A, Fontanarosa E, Santagostino A, Bestetti G (2010) Influence of compost amendment on microbial community and ecotoxicity of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Bioresour Technol 101: 568-575.
8. Jimoh A (2004) Effect of immobilized materials on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. AU J Technol 8: 62-68.
9. Junier P, Junier T, Witzel K-P (2008) TRiFLe, a program for in silico terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis with user-defined sequence sets. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 6452-6456.
10. Labana S, Pandey G, Paul D, Sharma NK, Basu A, Jain RK (2005) Pot and field studies on bioremediation of p-nitrophenol contaminated soil using Arthrobacter protophormiae RKJ100. Environ Sci Technol 39: 3330-3337.
11. Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ (1997) Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 4516-4522.
12. McLoughlin AJ (1994) Controlled release of immobilized cells as a strategy to regulate ecological competence of inocula. In: Scheper T (ed) Biotechnics/wastewater. Springer, Berlin, pp 1-45.
13. Ministero per le Politiche Agricole (1999) Decreto Ministeriale del 13/09/1999--"Metodi ufficiali di analisi chimica del suolo".
14. Mishra S, Jyot J, Kuhad RC, Lal B (2001) In situ bioremediation potential of an oily sludge-degrading bacterial consortium. Curr Microbiol 43: 328-335.
15. Moslemy P, Neufeld RJ, Guiot SR (2002) Biodegradation of gasoline by gellan gum-encapsulated bacterial cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 80: 175-184.
16. Mrozik A, Piotrowska-Seget Z (2010) Bioaugmentation as a strategy for cleaning up of soils contaminated with aromatic compounds. Microbiol Res 165: 363-375.
17. Philp JC, Atlas RM (2005) Bioremediation of contaminated soils and aquifers. In: Atlas RM, Philp J (eds) Bioremediation, ASM Press, Washington, DC.
18. Plangklang P, Reungsang A (2009) Bioaugmentation of carbofuran residues in soil using Burkholderia cepacia PCL3 adsorbed on agricultural residues. Int Biodeter Biodegr 63: 515-522.
19. Ranjard L, Poly F, Nazaret S (2000) Monitoring complex bacterial communities using culture-independent molecular techniques: application to soil environment. Res Microbiol 151: 167-177.
20. Smalla K, Wachtendorf U, Heuer H, Liu W-T, Forney L (1998) Analysis of BIOLOG GN substrate utilization patterns by microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 1220-1225.
21. Straube WL, Jones-Meehan J, Pritchard PH, Jones WR (1999) Bench-scale optimization of bioaugmentation strategies for treatment of soils contaminated with high molecular weight polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Res Conserv Recycl 27: 27-37.
22. Suzuki MT, Giovannoni SJ (1996) Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 625-630.
23. Suzuki MT, Rappe MS, Giovannoni SJ (1998) Kinetic bias estimates of coastal picoplankton community structure obtained by measurements of small-subunit rRNA gene PCR amplicon length heterogeneity. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 4522-4529.
24. Tyagi M, da Fonsec MMR, de Carvalho CCCR (2011) Bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies to improve the effectiveness of bioremediation processes. Biodegradation 22: 231-241.
25. van Veen JA, van Overbeek LS, Elsas JD (1997) Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 121.