Efficiency of using community organisations as catalysts for recruitment to continence promotion trials

Clinical Trials

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 151-159

  Agnew, Rona ^a   Van Den Heuvel, Eleanor ^b   Tannenbaum, Cara ^c  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; CONTINENCE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INCONTINENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SELF CARE; UNITED KINGDOM; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WORKSHOP;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84872871026     PISSN: 17407745     EISSN: 17407753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1740774512460144     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Thompson CL, et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the USA, the UK and Sweden: Results from the Epidemiology of LUTS (EpiLUTS) study. BJU Int. 2009 ; 104: 352-60
2. Buckley BS, Lapitan MCM. Prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence and nocturnal enuresis and attitudes to treatment and help-seeking amongst a community-based representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom. Int J Clin Pract. 2009 ; 63: 568-73
3. McGrother CW, Donaldson MMK, Shaw C, et al. Storage symptoms of the bladder: Prevalence, incidence and need for services in the UK. BJU Int. 2004 ; 93: 763-69
4. Shaw C. A review of the psychosocial predictors of help-seeking behavior and impact on quality of life in people with urinary incontinence. J Clin Nurs. 2001 ; 10: 15-24
5. Turner DA, Shaw C, McGrother CW, et al. The cost of clinically significant urinary storage symptoms for community dwelling adults in the UK. BJU Int. 2004 ; 93: 1246-52
6. O'Donnell M, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S, Hunskaar S. Help-seeking behaviour and associated factors among women with urinary incontinence in France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom. Eur Urol. 2005 ; 47: 385-92
7. Continence Worldwide. http://www.continenceworldwide.org/ (accessed 27 December 2011).
8. Kincade JE, Dougherty M, Carlson JR, Hunter GS, Busby-Whitehead J. Randomized clinical trial of efficacy of self-monitoring techniques to treat urinary incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007 ; 26: 507-11
9. Boyington A, Dougherty M, Phetrasuwan S. Effectiveness of a computer based system to deliver a continence health promotion intervention. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005 ; 32: 246-54
10. Dougherty M, Dwyer J, Pendergast J, et al. A randomised trial of behavioural management of continence with older rural women. Res Nurs Health. 2002 ; 25: 3-13
11. Milne J. The impact of information on health behaviours of older adults with urinary incontinence. Clin Nurs Res. 2000 ; 9: 161-76
12. Diokno A, Sampselle C, Herzog R, et al. Prevention of urinary incontinence by a behavioural modification programme: A randomised controlled trial among older women in the community. J Urol. 2004 ; 171: 1165-71
13. McFall SL, Yerkes AM, Cowan LD. Outcomes of a small group educational intervention for urinary incontinence: Episodes of incontinence and other urinary symptoms. JAging Health. 2000 ; 12: 250-67
14. Tannenbaum C, Drali R, Holroyd-Leduc J, Richard L. Lessons learned: Impact of a continence promotion activity for older community dwelling women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 ; 29: 540-44
15. Holroyd-Leduc J, Straus S, Thorpe K, et al. Translation of evidence into a self-management tool for use by women with urinary incontinence. Age Ageing. 2011 ; 40: 227-33
16. Franzén K, Johansson JE, Andersson G, Pettersson N, Nilsson K. Urinary incontinence: Evaluation of an information campaign directed towards the general public. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008 ; 42: 534-38
17. Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 ; 14 (4). MR000013
18. McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006 ; 7: 9
19. Watson JM, Torgerson DJ. Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: A review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 ; 6: 34
20. Brubaker L, Moalli P, Richter HE, et al. Challenges in designing a pragmatic clinical trial: The mixed incontinence - Medical or surgical approach (MIMOSA) trial experience. Clin Trials. 2009 ; 6: 355-64
21. Caldwell PHY, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC. Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Systematic review. PLoS Med. 2010 ; 7 (11). e1000368
22. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003 ; 289: 1278-87
23. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002 ; 21: 167-78
24. Lennox N, Taylor M, Rey-Conde T, et al. Beating the barriers: Recruitment of people with intellectual disability to participate in research. J Intellectual Disabil Res. 2005 ; 49: 296-305