Structure of the Sgt2/Get5 complex provides insights into GET-mediated targeting of tail-anchored membrane proteins

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1327-1332

  Simon, Aline C ^a   Simpson, Peter J ^a   Goldstone, Rachael M ^a   Krysztofinska, Ewelina M ^a   Murray, James W ^a   High, Stephen ^b   Isaacson, Rivka L ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL MEMBRANE PROTEIN; GET5 PROTEIN; SGT2 PROTEIN; TAIL ANCHORED MEMBRANE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GUIDED ENTRY OF TAIL ANCHORED MEMBRANE PROTEIN; ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; STOICHIOMETRY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; CARRIER PROTEINS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITINS;

EID: 84872853351     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1207518110     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Borgese N, Righi M (2010) Remote origins of tail-anchored proteins. Traffic 11(7): 877-885.
2. Borgese N, Fasana E (2011) Targeting pathways of C-tail-anchored proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1808(3):937-946.
3. Simpson PJ, Schwappach B, Dohlman HG, Isaacson RL (2010) Structures of Get3, Get4, and Get5 provide new models for TA membrane protein targeting. Structure 18(8): 897-902.
4. Chartron JW, Clemons WM, Jr., Suloway CJ (2012) The complex process of GETting tail-anchored membrane proteins to the ER. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22(2):217-224.
5. Liou ST, Cheng MY, Wang C (2007) SGT2 and MDY2 interact with molecular chaperone YDJ1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Stress Chaperones 12(1):59-70.
6. Kohl C, et al. (2011) Cooperative and independent activities of Sgt2 and Get5 in the targeting of tail-anchored proteins. Biol Chem 392(7):601-608.
7. Chang YW, et al. (2010) Crystal structure of Get4-Get5 complex and its interactions with Sgt2, Get3, and Ydj1. J Biol Chem 285(13):9962-9970.
8. Mariappan M, et al. (2011) The mechanism of membrane-associated steps in tail-anchored protein insertion. Nature 477(7362):61-66.
9. Stefer S, et al. (2011) Structural basis for tail-anchored membrane protein biogenesis by the Get3-receptor complex. Science 333(6043):758-762.
10. Dutta S, Tan YJ (2008) Structural and functional characterization of human SGT and its interaction with Vpu of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Biochemistry 47(38):10123-10131.
11. Chartron JW, Gonzalez GM, Clemons WM, Jr. (2011) A structural model of the Sgt2 protein and its interactions with chaperones and the Get4/Get5 complex. J Biol Chem 286(39):34325-34334.
12. Bozkurt G, et al. (2010) The structure of Get4 reveals an alpha-solenoid fold adapted for multiple interactions in tail-anchored protein biogenesis. FEBS Lett 584(8): 1509-1514.
13. Schantl JA, Roza M, De Jong AP, Strous GJ (2003) Small glutamine-rich tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein (SGT) interacts with the ubiquitin-dependent endocytosis (UbE) motif of the growth hormone receptor. Biochem J 373(Pt 3): 855-863.
14. Buchanan G, et al. (2007) Control of androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer by the cochaperone small glutamine rich tetratricopeptide repeat containing protein alpha. Cancer Res 67(20):10087-10096.
15. Leznicki P, Warwicker J, High S (2011) A biochemical analysis of the constraints of tailanchored protein biogenesis. Biochem J 436(3):719-727.
16. Wang F, Whynot A, Tung M, Denic V (2011) The mechanism of tail-anchored protein insertion into the ER membrane. Mol Cell 43(5):738-750.
17. Wang Q, et al. (2011) A ubiquitin ligase-associated chaperone holdase maintains polypeptides in soluble states for proteasome degradation. Mol Cell 42(6):758-770.
18. Simon AC, et al. (2012) 1H, 13C and 15N assignments of Sgt2 N-terminal dimerisation domain and its binding partner, Get5 Ubiquitin-like domain. Biomol NMR Assign, in press.
19. Krissinel E, Henrick K (2007) Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 372(3):774-797.
20. Hänzelmann P, Stingele J, Hofmann K, Schindelin H, Raasi S (2010) The yeast E4 ubiquitin ligase Ufd2 interacts with the ubiquitin-like domains of Rad23 and Dsk2 via a novel and distinct ubiquitin-like binding domain. J Biol Chem 285(26):20390-20398.
21. Winget JM, Mayor T (2010) The diversity of ubiquitin recognition: Hot spots and varied specificity. Mol Cell 38(5):627-635.
22. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM (2003) HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 125(7): 1731-1737.
23. Chartron JW, Suloway CJ, Zaslaver M, Clemons WM, Jr. (2010) Structural characterization of the Get4/Get5 complex and its interaction with Get3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(27):12127-12132.
24. Chartron JW, VanderVelde DG, Rao M, Clemons WM, Jr. (2012) Get5 carboxyl-terminal domain is a novel dimerization motif that tethers an extended Get4/Get5 complex. J Biol Chem 287(11):8310-8317.
25. Sattler M, Schleucher J, Griesinger C (1999) Heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments for the structure determination of proteins in solution employing pulsed field gradients. Prog Nucl Mag Res Sp 34(2):93-158.
26. Pervushin K, Riek R, Wider G, Wuthrich K (1998) Transverse relaxation-optimized spectroscopy (TROSY) for NMR studies of aromatic spin systems in C-13-labeled proteins. J Am Chem Soc 120(25):6394-6400.
27. Delaglio F, et al. (1995) NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6(3):277-293.
28. Jung YS, Zweckstetter M (2004) Mars - Robust automatic backbone assignment of proteins. J Biomol NMR 30(1):11-23.
29. Marchant J, Sawmynaden K, Saouros S, Simpson P, Matthews S (2008) Complete resonance assignment of the first and second apple domains of MIC4 from Toxoplasma gondii, using a new NMRView-based assignment aid. Biomol NMR Assign 2(2): 119-121.
30. Battye TGG, Kontogiannis L, Johnson O, Powell HR, Leslie AGW (2011) iMOSFLM: A new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 67(Pt 4):271-281.
31. Langer G, Cohen SX, Lamzin VS, Perrakis A (2008) Automated macromolecular model building for X-ray crystallography using ARP/wARP version 7. Nat Protoc 3(7): 1171-1179.
32. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66(Pt 4):486-501.
33. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 53(Pt 3): 240-255.