Diagnostic value of pelvic MRI for assessment of the depth of myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer: Comparison of new versus old FIGO staging

Iranian Journal of Radiology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 202-208

  Zamani, Fatemeh ^a   Goodarzi, Shirin ^a   Hallaji, Faride ^a   Zamiri, Azadeh ^a   Deilami, Tourisa ^a   Malek, Mahrooz ^b   Gilani, Mitra Modarress ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cancer Staging; Endometrial Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Myometrium; Uterus

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INFILTRATION; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EARLY CANCER; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOMETRIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIC MRI; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX;

EID: 84872850033     PISSN: 17351065     EISSN: 20082711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.5276     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277-300.
2. Lee EJ, Byun JY, Kim BS, Koong SE, Shinn KS. Staging of early endometrial carcinoma: assessment with T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiographics. 1999;19(4):937-45.
3. Mikuta JJ. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of endometrial cancer 1988. Cancer. 1993;71(4 Suppl):1460-3.
4. Alexiou VG, Ierodiakonou V, Peppas G, Falagas ME. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: an international survey. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010;11(4):343-8.
5. Creasman W. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):109.
6. Creasman WT, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Quinn MA, Beller U, Benedet JL, et al. Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95(Suppl 1):S105-43.
7. Ballester M, Koskas M, Coutant C, Chereau E, Seror J, Rouzier R, et al. Does the use of the 2009 FIGO classification of endometrial cancer impact on indications of the sentinel node biopsy? BMC Cancer. 2010;10:465.
8. Beddy P, O'Neill AC, Yamamoto AK, Addley HC, Reinhold C, Sala E. FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: added benefits of MR imaging. Radiographics. 2012;32(1):241-54.
9. Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu KK, Segal MR, Lu Y, Powell CB, et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology. 1999;212(3):711-8.
10. Barwick TD, Rockall AG, Barton DP, Sohaib SA. Imaging of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Clin Radiol. 2006;61(7):545-55.
11. Frei KA, Kinkel K. Staging endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(6):850-5.
12. Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F, Alberto Lissoni A, Signorelli M, Scambia G, et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(23):1707-16.
13. Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q, Amos C, Parmar MK. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet. 2009;373(9658):125-36.
14. Leitao MM, Jr., Chi DS. Fertility-sparing options for patients with gynecologic malignancies. Oncologist. 2005;10(8):613-22.
15. Hirano Y, Kubo K, Hirai Y, Okada S, Yamada K, Sawano S, et al. Preliminary experience with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for uterine neoplasms. Radiographics. 1992;12(2):243-56.
16. Hricak H, Rubinstein LV, Gherman GM, Karstaedt N. MR imaging evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results of an NCI cooperatIVe study. Radiology. 1991;179(3):829-32.
17. Lien HH, Blomlie V, Trope C, Kaern J, Abeler VM. Cancer of the endometrium: value of MR imaging in determining depth of invasion into the myometrium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(6):1221-3.
18. Rose PG. Endometrial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(9):640-9.
19. Creasman WT, Rock J, Jones HW. Operative gynecology. p. 919-59
20. Toki T, Oka K, Nakayama K, Oguchi O, Fujii S. A comparatIVe study of pre-operatIVe procedures to assess cervical invasion by endometrial carcinoma. BrJ Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(5):512-6.
21. Sanjuan A, Escaramis G, Ayuso JR, Roman SM, Torne A, Ordi J, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and cause of pitfalls in detecting myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(6):S35-9.
22. Vasconcelos C, Felix A, Cunha TM. PreoperatIVe assessment of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic evaluation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(1):65-70.
23. Ortashi O, Jain S, Emannuel O, Henry R, Wood A, Evans J. Evaluation of the sensitIVity, specificity, positIVe and negatIVe predictIVe values of preoperatIVe magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospectIVe study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137(2):232-5.
24. Sala E, Crawford R, Senior E, Shaw A, Simcock B, Vrotsou K, et al. Added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting advanced stage disease in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(1):141-6.
25. Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G, Margariti PA, Testa A, Zannoni GF, et al. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology. 2004;231(2):372-8.
26. Cunha TM, Felix A, Cabral I. PreoperatIVe assessment of deep myo-metrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and gross visual inspection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11(2):130-6.
27. Cabrita S, Rodrigues H, Abreu R, Martins M, Teixeira L, Marques C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperatIVe staging of endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(2):135-7.
28. Savelli L, Ceccarini M, Ludovisi M, Fruscella E, De Iaco PA, Salizzoni E, et al. Preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer: transvaginal sonography vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(5):560-6.
29. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet 2005;366(9484):491-505.
30. Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, Watari H, Takeda M, Sakuragi N. SurvIVal effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospectIVe cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9721):1165-72.
31. Rieck GC, Bulman J, Whitaker R, Leeson SC. A retrospectIVe review of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the extent of myome-trial infiltration for patients with endometrial carcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(8):765-8.
32. Sanjuan A, Cobo T, Pahisa J, Escaramis G, Ordi J, Ayuso JR, et al. PreoperatIVe and intraoperatIVe assessment of myometrial invasion and histologic grade in endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(1):385-90.
33. Sironi S, Colombo E, Villa G, Taccagni G, Belloni C, Garancini P, et al. Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment with plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 1992;185(1):207-12.