Practical guidance: The use of social media in oncology practice

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Dizon, Don S ^a   Graham, David ^a   Thompson, Michael A ^a   Johnson, Lisa J ^a   Johnston, Claire ^a   Fisch, Michael J ^a   Miller, Robert ^a  

^a not available

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ONCOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORK;

EID: 84872849857     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000610     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Society of Clinical Oncology: ASCO guidelines, methodology manual. expert panel version 4.0. www.asco.org/ascov2/Practice+&+Guidelines/ Guidelines/Development+Process
2. Madden M, Zickuhr K: Pew Internet and American Life Project: 65% of online adults use social networking sites. www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/ Social-Networking-Sites.aspx
3. McGowan B, Vartabedian B, Miller R, et al: The "meaningful use" of social media by physicians for learning. Presented at Medicine 2.0'11, 4th World Congress on Social Media and Web 2.0 in Health, Medicine, and Biomedical Research, September 17-18, 2011, Stanford, CA, www.medicine20congress.com/ ocs/index.php/med/med2011/paper/view/764
4. Chaudhry A, Glode LM, Gillman M, et al: Trends in Twitter usage by physicians at the ASCO annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. J Oncol Pract 8:173-178, 2012
5. Pelletier S: Top 10 questions about social media and CME. http://meetingsnet.com/medicalmeetings/news/top-10-questions-social-media-cme/
6. Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, et al: The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: Results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 26:1168-1174, 2011
7. Society for Participatory Medicine: http://participatorymedicine.org/
8. Ferguson T: E-patients: How they can help us heal health care. http://e-patients.net/e-Patients-White-Paper.pdf
9. Chretien KC, Azar J, Kind T: Physicians on Twitter. JAMA 305:566-568, 2011
10. Fox S: Cancer 2.0: A summary of recent research. http://pewinternet.org/ Reports/2010/30-Cancer-20/Report.aspx
11. Caldwell PH, Hamilton S, Tan A, et al: Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomized controlled trials: Systematic review. PLoS Med 7:e1000368, 2010
12. US Food and Drug Administration: CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 56, Institutional Review Boards, Subpart C, IRB functions and operations, §56.109, IRB review of research. www.accessdata.fda.gov/ scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/ cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=56.109
13. Department of Health and Human Services: Human subjects research protections: Enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. Federal Register 76(143). www.gpo.gov/ fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-07-26/html/2011-18792.htm
14. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). Guidance on institutional review board review of clinical trial websites. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/ clinicaltrials.html
15. Office of Inspector General: Clinical Trial Web Sites. A promising tool to foster informed consent. http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-97-00198.pdf