Practical and economic aspects of the Ex-Situ process: Implications for CO2 sequestration

Energy and Fuels

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 401-413

  Zendehboudi, Sohrab ^a   Bahadori, Alireza ^b   Lohi, Ali ^c   Elkamel, Ali ^a   Chatzis, Ioannis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRINE PHASE; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; DISSOLUTION RATES; DROPLET SIZES; ECONOMIC ASPECTS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; EX SITU; GEOCHEMICAL REACTION; MASS TRANSFER MODELING; PRESSURE BUILD UP; PRESSURE CHANGE; SALINE AQUIFERS; SECURE IMPLEMENTATION; TECHNICAL CHALLENGES; TECHNOLOGY-BASED;

AQUIFERS; CARBON CAPTURE; DISSOLUTION; DROPS; HYDROGEOLOGY; MASS TRANSFER; WELL SPACING;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84872826660     PISSN: 08870624     EISSN: 15205029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ef301278c     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. 2 problem Climate Change 1977, 1 (1) 59-68
2. Halmann, M. M.; Steinberg, M. Greenhouse Gas Carbon Dioxide Mitigation; Lewis: Boca Raton, 1999.
3. Herzog, H. J. What future for carbon capture and sequestration Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35 (7) 148A-153A
4. 2 through surface dissolution: Implementation costs and technical challenges SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 2009, 12 (3) 399-407
5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2007.
6. 2 storage in saline aquifers Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 1962-1969
7. 2 modeling in a deep saline aquifer: A predictive uncertainty analysis using design of experiment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 3504-3510
8. Benson, S. M.; Myer, L. Monitoring to ensure safe and effective geologic storage of carbon dioxide. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Workshop on Carbon Sequestration, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, Nov., 2002.
9. 2 in brines. 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, IEA Greenhouse Gas Program, Cheltenham, U.K., 2004.
10. Dentz, M.; Tartakovsky, D. M. Abrupt-interface solution for carbon dioxide injection into porous media Trans. Porous Media 2009, 79, 15-27
11. 2 stored in aquifers Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 2742-2747
12. 2 plume evolution during injection Trans. Porous Media 2002, 58, 339-360
13. 2 geo-sequestration on overlying freshwater aquifers Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 9225-9232
14. 2 storage in saline aquifers Adv. Water Res. 2010, 33 (4) 443-455
15. 2 in deep saline aquifers Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36 (11) 240A-245A
16. Hassanzadeh, H.; Pooladi-Darvish, M.; Keith, D. W. Stability of a fluid in a horizontal saturated porous layer: Effect of nonlinear concentration profile, initial, and boundary conditions Trans. Porous Media 2006, 65, 193-211
17. Adams, J. J.; Bachu, S. Equations of state for basin geofluids: Algorithm review and intercomparison for brines Geofluids 2002, 2 (4) 257-271
18. Riaz, A.; Hesse, M.; Tchelepi, H. A.; Orr, F. M. Onset of convection in a gravitationally unstable diffusive boundary layer in porous media J. Fluid Mech. 2006, 548, 87-111
19. 2 sequestration: A framework for integrated monitoring design Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 845-859
20. 2 sequestration Energy Fuels 2011, 25 (7) 3323-3333
21. 2 injection and storage in brine aquifers. M.Sc Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, 2008.
22. Garson, G. D. Interpreting neural-network connection weights Artificial Intelligence Expert 1991, 6, 47-51
23. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Determination of maximum injection pressure for class I wells. United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 5-Underground Injection Control Section Regional Guidance #7; U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, 1994.
24. 2O system and preliminary mineralisation model and experiments. CATO Work Package 188, WP 4.1; Shell International E&P: Houston, TX, 2005.
25. 2 solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000 bar Chem. Geol. 2003, 193, 257-271
26. 2. I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100 C and up to 600 bar Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67 (16) 3015-3031
27. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
28. 2 leakage along wellbores. E&P Environmental and Safety Conference, Galveston, TX, March 5-7, 2007; SPE 106817.
29. 2 sequestration, ECBM, EOR demos Oil Gas J. 2008, 106 (37) 60-63
30. 2 EOR) injection well technology API Special Rep. 2008, 62
31. 2 environment: A laboratory comparison. 4th Meeting of the Well Bore Integrity Network, Paris, France, March 18-19, 2008.
32. 2 storage in saline formations: Implications for pressure management, capacity, and risk mitigation Energy Proc. 2011, 4, 4283-4290
33. 2 droplets shrinkage in ex situ dissolution approach with application to geological sequestration: Analytical solutions and feasibility study Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 197, 448-458
34. Ranz, W. E.; Marshall, W. R. Evaporation from drops Chem. Eng. Prog. 1952, 48 (3) 141-146
35. Kress, T. S.; Keyes, J. J. Liquid phase controlled mass transfer to bubbles in co-current turbulent pipeline flow Chem. Eng. Sci. 1973, 28, 1809-1823
36. Levich, V. G. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962.
37. Clift, R.; Grace, J. R.; Weber, M. E. Bubbles, Drops, and Particles; Academic Press: New York, 1978.
38. Nigmatulin, R. I. Dynamics of Multiphase Media; Hemisphere Publication Corporation: New York, 1991.
39. Hinze, J. O. Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting in dispersion processes AIChE J. 1955, 13, 289-295
40. Sleicher, C. A. Maximum stable drop size in turbulent flow AIChE J. 1962, 8 (4) 471-477
41. Carbon Capture: Beyond 2020; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Gaithersburg, MD, 2010.
42. 2 with application to carbon capture and storage Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2 (2) 219-229
43. 2 transport by pipeline and storage in saline aquifers and oil reservoirs. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 2008.
44. McCoy, S.; Rubin, E. Variability and uncertainty in the cost of saline formation storage Energy Proc. 2009, 1 (1) 4151-4158
45. Benson, S. M. From a geological perspective. Third Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration; VA Monitor Exchange Publications: Alexandria, VA, 2004.
46. 2 Capture Project, Vol. 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and Verification; Benson, S.M., Ed.; Elsevier: London, 2005; pp 1133-1141.
47. Benson, S. M. Monitoring geological storage of carbon dioxide. In Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Integrating Technology, Monitoring, and Regulation; Wilson, E.; Gerard, D., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, 2007.
48. 2 Storage and Sink Options, DOE Research Report DE-FC26-00NT40937; Department of Energy: Washington, DC, 2003.
49. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Special Report on Renewable Energy and Climate Change Mitigation, IPCC: Abu Dhabi, U.A.E., 2011.
50. Chemical Resistance Chart; Omega Engineering Co.; Stamford, CT, 2012; http://www.omega.com/pdf/tubing/technical-section/chemical-chart-1.asp (accessed Oct. 25, 2012).
51. ASTM Standards for Price Indexes. http://www.worldsteelprices.com (accessed Oct. 25, 2012).
52. API Standards for Price Indexes. http://www.alibaba.com (accessed Oct. 25, 2012).
53. 2 Storage Reservoirs; IEAGHG: Cheltenham, Glos., U.K., Sept. 11 2007.
54. Ontario Power Generation (OPG) Greenhouse Gas Action Plan 2000; submitted to Canada's Climate Change Voluntary Challenge and Registry, Inc.; Ontario Power Generation: Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Oct. 2001. Available online: www.ghgregistries.ca/registry/out/C0022-OPG2001-PDF.PDF (accessed Oct. 25, 2012).
55. 2 sequestration in Ontario, Canada. Part I: Storage evaluation of potential reservoirs Energy Convers. Manage. 2004, 45, 2645-2659
56. 2 sequestration in Ontario, Canada. Part II: Cost estimation Energy Convers. Manage. 2004, 45, 3207-3217