|
Volumn 309, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 347-348
|
Time to get serious about pay for performance
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT;
BEHAVIOR CHANGE;
CENTER FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICE;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
HEALTH CARE CONCEPTS;
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH PROGRAM;
HEALTH SERVICE;
HOSPITAL CARE;
HOSPITAL FINANCE;
HUMAN;
INCENTIVE SIZE;
INCENTIVE STRUCTURE;
INFECTION RATE;
INVESTMENT;
METRIC CHOICE;
MORTALITY;
MOTIVATION;
PAY FOR PERFORMANCE;
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SHORT SURVEY;
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;
ARTICLE;
ECONOMICS;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HOSPITAL;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
PURCHASING;
REIMBURSEMENT;
STANDARD;
STATISTICS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
DATA COLLECTION;
DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE;
HOSPITALS;
OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE;
UNITED STATES;
VALUE-BASED PURCHASING;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 84872793567
PISSN: 00987484
EISSN: 15383598
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.196646 Document Type: Short Survey |
Times cited : (67)
|
References (5)
|