Confirmation Bias in Studies of Nestmate Recognition: A Cautionary Note for Research into the Behaviour of Animals

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  van Wilgenburg, Ellen ^a   Elgar, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CONFIRMATION BIAS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECT SIZE; INSECT SOCIETY; NESTING; NESTMATE RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM COLONY; PSYCHOLOGY; RECOGNITION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; ANTS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; NESTING BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALIA; FORMICIDAE;

EID: 84872776846     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053548     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1969) Artifacts in behavioral research: Academic Press.
2. Rosenthal R (1976) Experimenter effects in behavioural research. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
3. Nickerson (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev gen phychol 2: 175-220.
4. MacCoun RJ, (1998) Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Ann Rev Psychol 49: 259-287.
5. Kaptchuk TJ, (2003) Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence. Brit Med J 326: 1453-1455.
6. Foster GG, Ysseldyke JE, Reese JH, (1975) I wouldn't have seen it if I hadn't believed it. Except Children 41: 469-473.
7. Balph DF, Balph MH, (1983) On the psychology of watching birds- the problem of observer-expectancy bias. Auk 100: 755-757.
8. Popper KR (2002) The logic of scientific discovery: Routledge.
9. Popper KR (2002) Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge: Routledge.
10. Fanelli D, (2010) Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLoS ONE 5.
11. Salvia JA, Meisel CJ, (1980) Observer bias- A methodological consideration in special-education research. J Spec Educ 14: 261-270.
12. Glass DJ (2007) Experimental design for biologists: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
13. Tillberg CV, Breed MD, Hinners SJ (2007) Field and Laboratory Exercises in Animal Behavior. London: Elsevier.
14. Krauth J (2000) Experimental design: a handbook and dictionary for medical and behavioral research: Elsevier.
15. Sani F, Todman J, Todman JB (2006) Experimental design and statistics for psychology: a first course: Blackwell Pub.
16. Bernard C, Greene HC, Henderson LJ (1957) An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine: Dover Publications.
17. Romesburg HC (2009) Best Research Practices: Lulu.com.
18. Gamboa GJ, Reeve HK, Holmes WG, (1991) Conceptual issues and methodology in kin recognition research, A critical discussion. Ethology 88: 109-127.
19. Rosenthal R, Fode KL, (1963) The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino-rat. Behav Sc 8: 183-189.
20. Marsh DM, Hanlon TJ, (2007) Seeing what we want to see: Confirmation bias in animal behavior research. Ethology 113: 1089-1098.
21. Cordaro L, Ison JR, (1963) Psychology of the schientist. 10. Observer bias in classical-conditioning of the planarian. Psychol Rep 13: 787-789.
22. van Wilgenburg E, Ryan D, Morrison P, Marriott PJ, Elgar MA, (2006) Nest- and colony-mate recognition in polydomous colonies of meat ants (Iridomyrmex purpureus). Naturwissenschaften 93: 309-314.
23. van Zweden JSv, Dreier S, d'Ettorre P, (2009) Disentangling environmental and heritable nestmate recognition cues in a carpenter ant. J Insect Physiol 55: 158-163.
24. Foitzik S, Sturm H, Pusch K, D'Ettorre P, Heinze J, (2007) Nestmate recognition and intraspecific chemical and genetic variation in Temnothorax ants. Anim Behav 73: 999-1007.
25. Menzel F, Schmitt T, Bluthgen N, (2009) Intraspecific nestmate recognition in two parabiotic ant species: acquired recognition cues and low inter-colony discrimination. Insect Soc 56: 251-260.
26. Sunamura E, Hatsumi S, Karino S, Nishisue K, Terayama M, et al. (2009) Four mutually incompatible Argentine ant supercolonies in Japan: inferring invasion history of introduced Argentine ants from their social structure. Biol Invasions 11: 2329-2339.
27. van Zweden JS, d'Ettorre P (2010) Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbons. In: Blomquist GJ, Bagnéres A-G, editors. Insect Hydrocarbons: Biology, Biochemistry, and Chemical Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Vander Meer RK, Morel L (1998) Nestmate recognition in ants. In: Vander Meer RK, Breed M, Winston M, Espelie KE, editors. Pheromone communication in social insects. Boulder, CO. 368 p.: Westview Press. pp. 79-103.
29. d'Ettorre P, Lenoir A (2009) Nestmate and kin recognition. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K, editors. Ant Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Roulston TH, Buczkowski G, Silverman J, (2003) Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insect Soc 50: 151-159.
31. Breed MD, (2003) Nestmate Recognition Assays As a Tool for Population and Ecological Studies in Eusocial Insects: A Review. J Kansas Entomol Soc 76: 539-550.
32. Gurevitch J, Morrow LL, Wallace A, Walsh JS, (1992) A Meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. Am Nat 140: 539-572.
33. Thomas ML, Payne-Makrisa CM, Suarez AV, Holway DA, (2006) When supercolonies collide: territorial aggression in an invasive and unicolonial social insect. Mol ecol 15: 4303-4315.
34. Vasquez GM, Silverman J, (2008) Intraspecific aggression and colony fusion in the Argentine ant. Anim Behav 75: 583-593.
35. Thomas ML, Parry LJ, Allan RA, Elgar MA, (1999) Geographic affinity, cuticular hydrocarbons and colony recognition in the Australian meat ant Iridomyrmex purpureus. Naturwissenschaften 86: 87-92.
36. van Wilgenburg E, Clemencet J, Tsutsui ND (2009) Experience influences aggressive behaviour in the Argentine ant. Biol letters.
37. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J (1999) MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-analysis. 2 ed. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer associates.
38. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV (2001) Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Raudenbush SW (1994) Analyzing effect sizes: Random effects models. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The Handbook of Research Synthesis New York: Russell Sage Foundation. pp. 302-332.
40. van Wilgenburg E, Dang S, Forti AL, Koumoundouros TJ, Ly A, et al. (2007) An absence of aggression between non-nestmates in the bull ant Myrmecia nigriceps. Naturwissenschaften 94: 787-790.
41. Hsu YY, Wolf LL, (1999) The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav 57: 903-910.
42. Hsu YY, Wolf LL, (2001) The winner and loser effect: What fighting behaviours are influenced? Anim Behav 61: 777-786.
43. Elgar MA, (1989) Predator vigilance and group-size in mammals and birds- A critical-review of the emperical-evidence. Biol Rev 64: 13-33.
44. Zuk M (2003) Sexual selections: what we can and can't learn about sex from animals: University of California Press.
45. Hergovich A, Schott R, Burger C, (2010) Biased Evaluation of Abstracts Depending on Topic and Conclusion: Further Evidence of a Confirmation Bias Within Scientific Psychology. Curr Psychol 29: 188-209.
46. Breed MD, Stiller TM, Fewell JH, Harrison JM, (1991) Intercolonial interactions and nestmate discrimination in the giant tropical ant, Paraponera clavata. Biotropica 23: 301-306.
47. Jaffe K, Marcuse M, (1983) Nestmate recognition and territorial behaviour in the ant Odontomachus bauri Emery (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Insect Soc 30: 466-481.
48. Lucas C, Pho DB, Fresneau D, Jallon JM, (2005) Role of cuticular hydrocarbons in the chemical recognition between ant species in the Pachycondyla villosa species complex. J Insect Physiol 51: 1148-1157.
49. Mintzer A, (1982) Nestmate recognition and incompatibility between colonies of the acacia-ant Pseudomyrmex ferruginea [sic]. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10: 165-168.
50. Starks PT, Watson RE, Matthew MJ, Dipaola CP, (1998) The effect of queen number on nestmate discrimination in the facultatively polygynous ant Pseudomyrmex pallidus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 104: 573-584.
51. van Wilgenburg E, (2007) The influence of relatedness, neighbourhood and overall distance on colony mate recognition in a polydomous ant. Ethology 113: 1185-1191.
52. van Wilgenburg E, van Lieshout E, Elgar MA, (2005) Conflict resolution strategies in meat ants (Iridomyrmex purpureus): ritualised displays versus lethal fighting. Behaviour 142: 701-716.
53. van Wilgenburg E, Ryan D, Morrison P, Marriott PJ, Elgar MA, (2006) Nest- and colony-mate recognition in polydomous colonies of meat ants (Iridomyrmex purpureus). Naturwissenschaften 93: 309-314.
54. Caldera EJ, Holway DA, (2004) Evidence that queens do not influence nestmate recognition in Argentine ants. Insect Soc 51: 109-112.
55. Bjorkman-Chiswell BT, van Wilgenburg E, Thomas ML, Swearer SE, Elgar MA, (2008) Absence of aggression but not nestmate recognition in an Australian population of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile. Insect Soc 55: 207-212.
56. Sunamura E, Hatsumi S, Karino S, Nishisue K, Terayama M, et al. (2009) Four mutually incompatible Argentine ant supercolonies in Japan: inferring invasion history of introduced Argentine ants from their social structure. Biol Invasions 11: 2329-2339.
57. Thomas ML, Payne-Makrisâ CM, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA, (2006) When supercolonies collide: territorial aggression in an invasive and unicolonial social insect. Mol Ecol 15: 4303-4315.
58. Vásquez GM, Silverman J, (2008) Queen acceptance and the complexity of nestmate discrimination in the Argentine ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62: 537-548.
59. Breed MD, Abel P, Bleuze TJ, Denton SE, (1990) Thievery, home ranges, and nestmate recognition in Ectatomma ruidum. Oecologia 84: 117-121.
60. Breed MD, Snyder LE, Lynn TL, Morhart JA, (1992) Acquired chemical camouflage in a tropical ant. Anim Behav 44: 519-523.
61. Zinck L, Hora RR, Châline N, Jaisson P, (2008) Low intraspecific aggression level in the polydomous and facultative polygynous ant Ectatomma tuberculatum. Entomol Exp Appl 126: 211-216.
62. Drescher J, Blüthgen N, Feldhaar H, (2007) Population structure and intraspecific aggression in the invasive ant species Anoplolepis gracilipes in Malaysian Borneo. Mol Ecol 16: 1453-1465.
63. Bos N, Guerrieri FJ, d'Ettorre P, (2010) Significance of chemical recognition cues is context dependent in ants. Anim Behav 80: 839-844.
64. Stroeymeyt N, Guerrieri FJ, van Zweden JS, d'Ettorre P, (2010) Rapid Decision-Making with Side-Specific Perceptual Discrimination in Ants. PLoS ONE 5.
65. van Zweden JS, Dreier S, d'Ettorre P, (2009) Disentangling environmental and heritable nestmate recognition cues in a carpenter ant. J Insect Physiol 55: 158-163.
66. Vicente Hernandez J, Rodriguez D, Tarano Z, Drijfhout FP, Sainz-Borgo C, (2010) Are Postpharyngeal or Mandibular Gland Secretions the Source for Nestmate Recognition in Camponotus atriceps (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)? Sociobiol 56: 775-793.
67. Boulay R, Cerdá X, Simon T, Roldan M, Hefetz A, (2007) Intraspecific competition in the ant Camponotus cruentatus: should we expect the 'dear enemy' effect? Anim Behav 74: 985-993.
68. Boulay R, Lenoir A, (2001) Social isolation of mature workers affects nestmate recognition in the ant Camponotus fellah. Behav Process 55: 67-73.
69. Katzav-Gozansky T, Boulay R, Vander Meer R, Hefetz A, (2004) In-nest environment modulates nestmate recognition in the ant Camponotus fellah. Naturwissenschaften 91: 186-190.
70. Katzav-Gozansky T, Boulay R, Ionescu-Hirsh A, Hefetz A, (2008) Nest volatiles as modulators of nestmate recognition in the ant Camponotus fellah. J Insect Physiol 54: 378-385.
71. Moore D, Liebig J, (2010) Mixed messages: fertility signaling interferes with nestmate recognition in the monogynous ant Camponotus floridanus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64: 1011-1018.
72. Morel L, Vander Meer RK, Lavine BK, (1988) Ontogeny of nestmate recognition cues in the red carpenter ant (Camponotus floridanus)-behavioral and chemical evidence for the role of age and social experience. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22: 175-183.
73. Liu Z, Yamane S, Wang Q, Yamamoto H, (1998) Nestmate recognition and temporal modulation in the patterns of cuticular hydrocarbons in natural colonies of Japanese carpenter ant Camponotus japonicus Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Ethol 16: 57-65.
74. Jaffe K, Sanchez C, (1984) On the nestmate-recognition system and territorial marking behaviour in the ant Camponotus rufipes. Insect Soc 31: 302-315.
75. Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Clément JL, Lange C, (1987) Nestmate recognition: the role of cuticular hydrocarbons in the ant Camponotus vagus Scop. J Entomol Sci 22: 1-10.
76. Satoh T, Hirota T, (2005) Factors affecting internest variation in the aggressiveness of a polygynous ant, Camponotus yamaokai. Entomol Sci 8: 277-281.
77. Nowbahari M, Lenoir A, (1989) Age related changes in aggression in ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Influence on intercolonial relationships. Behav Process 18: 173-181.
78. Nowbahari E, Lenoir A, Clément JL, Lange C, Bagneres AG, et al. (1990) Individual, geographical and experimental variation of cuticular hydrocarbons of the ant Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): their use in nest and subspecies recognition. Biochem Syst Ecol 18: 63-74.
79. Dahbi A, Lenoir A, (1998) Nest separation and the dynamics of the Gestalt odor in the polydomous ant Cataglyphis iberica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42: 349-355.
80. Lahav S, Soroker V, Hefetz A, Vander Meer RK, (1999) Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as ant recognition discriminators. Naturwissenschaften 86: 246-249.
81. Katzerke A, Neumann P, Pirk CWW, Bliss P, Moritz RFA, (2006) Seasonal nestmate recognition in the ant Formica exsecta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61: 143-150.
82. Martin SJ, Vitikainen E, Helantera H, Drijfhout FP, (2008) Chemical basis of nest-mate discrimination in the ant Formica exsecta. Proc Roy Soc B 275: 1271-1278.
83. Martin SJ, Helantera H, Kiss K, Lee YR, Drijfhout FP, (2009) Polygyny reduces rather than increases nestmate discrimination cue diversity in Formica exsecta ants. Insect Soc 56: 375-383.
84. Akino T, Yamamura K, Wakamura S, Yamaoka R, (2004) Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as nestmate recognition cues in Formica japonica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Appl Entomol Zool 39: 381-387.
85. Henderson G, Andersen JF, Phillips JK, Jeanne RL, (1990) Internest aggression and identification of possible nestmate discrimination pheromones in polygynous ant Formica montana. J Chem Ecol 16: 2217-2228.
86. Beye M, Neumann P, Chapuisat M, Pamilo P, Moritz RFA, (1998) Nestmate recognition and the genetic relatedness of nests in the ant Formica pratensis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43: 67-72.
87. Pirk CWW, Neumann P, Moritz RFA, Pamilo P, (2001) Intranest relatedness and nestmate recognition in the meadow ant Formica pratensis (R.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49: 366-374.
88. van Zweden JS, Brask JB, Christensen JH, Boomsma JJ, Linksvayer TA, et al. (2010) Blending of heritable recognition cues among ant nestmates creates distinct colony gestalt odours but prevents within-colony nepotism. J Evol Biol 23: 1498-1508.
89. Rosset H, Schwander T, Chapuiset M, (2007) Nestmate recognition and levels of aggression are not altered by changes in genetic diversity in a socially polymorphic ant. Anim Behav 74: 951-956.
90. Ugelvig LV, Drijfhout FP, Kronauer DJC, Boomsma JJ, Pedersen JS, et al. (2008) The introduction history of invasive garden ants in Europe: integrating genetic, chemical and behavioural approaches. BMC Biol 6:11: 20.
91. Newey PS, Robson SKA, Crozier RH, (2008) Near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool in behavioural ecology: a case study of the weaver ant, Oecophylla smaragdina. Anim Behav 76: 1727-1733.
92. Thurin N, Aron S, (2008) Seasonal nestmate recognition in the polydomous ant Plagiolepis pygmaea. Anim Behav 75: 1023-1030.
93. Dimarco RD, Farji-Brener AG, Premoli AC, (2010) Dear enemy phenomenon in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: behavioral and genetic evidence. Behav Ecol 21: 304-310.
94. Richard FJ, Hefetz A, Christides JP, Errard C, (2004) Food influence on colonial recognition and chemical signature between nestmates in the fungus-growing ant Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus. Chemoecology 14: 9-16.
95. Ichinose K, Cerda X, Jean-Philippe C, Lenoir A, (2005) Detecting nestmate recognition patterns in the fission-performing ant Aphaenogaster senilis: A comparison of different indices. J Insect Behav 18: 633-650.
96. Lenoir A, Cuisset D, Hefetz A, (2001) Effects of social isolation on hydrocarbon pattern and nestmate recognition in the ant Aphaenogaster senilis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 48: 101-109.
97. Singer TL, Espelie KE, (1998) Nest and nestmate recognition by a fungus-growing ant, Apterostigma collare Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 104: 929-939.
98. Debout G, Provost E, Renucci M, Tirard A, Schatz B, et al. (2003) Colony structure in a plant-ant: behavioural, chemical and genetic study of polydomy in Cataulacus mckeyi (Myrmicinae). Oecologia 137: 195-204.
99. Stuart RJ, (1991) Nestmate recognition in leptothoracine ants: testing for effects of queen number, colony size and species of intruder. Anim Behav 42: 277-284.
100. Stuart RJ, (1992) Nestmate recognition and the ontogeny of acceptability in the ant, Leptothorax curvispinosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30: 403-408.
101. Stuart RJ, Herbers JM, (2000) Nestmate recognition in ants with complex colonies: Within- and between-population variation. Behav Ecol 11: 676-685.
102. Stuart RJ, (1993) Differences in aggression among sympatric, faculatitively polygynous Leptothorax ant species. Anim Behav 46: 809-812.
103. Schmidt AM, d'Ettorre P, Pedersen JS, (2010) Low levels of nestmate discrimination despite high genetic differentiation in the invasive pharaoh ant. Front Zool 7:20: 14.
104. Furst M, Durey M, Nash DR, (2011) Testing the adjustable threshold model for intruder recognition on Myrmica ants in the context of a social parasite. Proc Roy Soc B Online early.
105. Garnas JR, Drummond FA, Groden E, (2007) Intercolony aggression within and among local populations of the invasive ant, Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in coastal Maine. Environ Entomol 36: 105-113.
106. Fournier D, De Biseau JC, Aron S, (2009) Genetics, behaviour and chemical recognition of the invading ant Pheidole megacephala. Mol Ecol 18: 186-199.
107. Fadamiro HY, He X, Chen L, (2009) Aggression in imported fire ants: an explanation for shifts in their spatial distributions in Southern United States? Ecol Entomol 34: 427-436.
108. Balas MT, Adams ES, (1996) Nestmate discrimination and competition in incipient colonies of fire ants. Anim Behav 51: 49-59.
109. Morel L, Vander Meer RK, Lofgren CS, (1990) Comparison of nestmate recognition between monogyne and polygyne populations of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83: 642-647.
110. Obin MS, (1986) Nestmate recognition cues in laboratory and field colonies of Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Effect of environment and the role of cuticular hydrocarbons. J Chem Ecol 12: 1965-1975.
111. Obin MS, Morel L, Vander Meer RK, (1993) Unexpected, well-developed nestmate recognition in laboratory colonies of polygyne imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Insect Behav 6: 579-589.
112. Foitzik S, Sturm H, Pusch K, D'Ettorre P, Heinze J, (2007) Nestmate recognition and intraspecific chemical and genetic variation in Temnothorax ants. Anim Behav 73: 999-1007.
113. Astruc C, Malosse C, Errard C, (2001) Lack of intraspecific aggression in the ant Tetramorium bicarinatum: a chemical hypothesis. J Chem Ecol 27: 1229-1248.