Corrigendum to “Modulation of somatosensory processing by action” [Elsevier, 70 (2013) 356-362](S1053811912012293)(10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.043);Modulation of somatosensory processing by action

NeuroImage

Volumn 70, Issue , 2013, Pages 356-362

  Shergill, Sukhwinder S ^a   White, Thomas P ^a   Joyce, Daniel W ^a   Bays, Paul M ^b   Wolpert, Daniel M ^c   Frith, Chris D ^d  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN REGION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSATION; SENSORY SYSTEM; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM;

EID: 84872774295     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.057     Document Type: Erratum

References (45)

1. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.H. Predictive attenuation in the perception of touch. Sensorimotor Foundations of Higher Cognition: Attention and Performance XXII 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford. P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, M. Kawato (Eds.).
2. Bays P.M., Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:1125-1128.
3. Bays P.M., Flanagan J.R., Wolpert D.M. Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e28.
4. Blakemore S.J., Sirigu A. Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 153:239-245.
5. Blakemore S.J., Goodbody S.J., Wolpert D.M. Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor context estimation. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18:7511-7518.
6. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M., Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nat. Neurosci. 1998, 1:635-640.
7. Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D., Frith C. Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport 2000, 11:R11-R16.
8. Blakemore S.J., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. Neuroreport 2001, 12:1879-1884.
9. Burton H. Cerebral cortex regions devoted to the somatosensory system: results from brain imaging studies in humans. The Somatosensory System: Deciphering the Brain's Own Body Image 2001, 27-72. CRC Press, New York. R.J. Nelson (Ed.).
10. Cerminara N.L., Apps R., Marple-Horvat D.E. An internal model of a moving visual target in the lateral cerebellum. J. Physiol. 2009, 587:429-442.
11. Crapse T.B., Sommer M.A. Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:587-600.
12. Dai T.H., Liu J.Z., Sahgal V., Brown R.W., Yue G.H. Relationship between muscle output and functional MRI-measured brain activation. Exp. Brain Res. 2001, 140:290-300.
13. Doehrmann O., Weigelt S., Altmann C.F., Kaiser J., Naumer M.J. Audiovisual functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation reveals multisensory integration effects in object-related sensory cortices. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:3370-3379.
14. Ehrsson H.H., Fagergren A., Jonsson T., Westling G., Johansson R.S., Forssberg H. Cortical activity in precision - versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study. J. Neurophysiol. 2000, 83:528-536.
15. Feinberg I. Efference copy and corollary discharge: implications for thinking and its disorders. Schizophr. Bull. 1978, 4:636-640.
16. Ford J.M., Mathalon D.H., Heinks T., Kalba S., Faustman W.O., Roth W.T. Neurophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 2001, 158:2069-2071.
17. Francis S.T., Kelly E.F., Bowtell R., Dunseath W.J., Folger S.E., McGlone F. fMRI of the responses to vibratory stimulation of digit tips. Neuroimage 2000, 11:188-202.
18. Frith C.D., Done D.J. Towards a neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychiatry 1988, 153:437-443.
19. Georgopoulos A.P., Ashe J., Smyrnis N., Taira M. The motor cortex and the coding of force. Science 1992, 256:1692-1695.
20. Hesse M.D., Nishitani N., Fink G.R., Jousmaki V., Hari R. Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:425-432.
21. Jackson S.R., Parkinson A., Pears S.L., Nam S.H. Effects of motor intention on the perception of somatosensory events: a behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove) 2011, 64:839-854.
22. Johansson R.S., Westling G. Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp. Brain Res. 1988, 71:72-86.
23. Jones S.J., Halonen J.P., Shawkat F. Centrifugal and centripetal mechanisms involved in the 'gating' of cortical SEPs during movement. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1989, 74:36-45.
24. Kuhtz-Buschbeck J.P., Gilster R., Wolff S., Ulmer S., Siebner H., Jansen O. Brain activity is similar during precision and power gripping with light force: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2008, 40:1469-1481.
25. Matyas F., Sreenivasan V., Marbach F., Wacongne C., Barsy B., Mateo C., Aronoff R., Petersen C.C. Motor control by sensory cortex. Science 2010, 330:1240-1243.
26. Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:483-506.
27. Nelson R.J. Interactions between motor commands and somatic perception in sensorimotor cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1996, 6:801-810.
28. Parkinson A., Plukaard S., Pears S.L., Newport R., Dijkerman C., Jackson S.R. Modulation of somatosensory perception by motor intention. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 2:47-56.
29. Rushton D.N., Rothwell J.C., Craggs M.D. Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. Brain 1981, 104:465-491.
30. Shergill S.S., Bays P.M., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation. Science 2003, 301:187.
31. Shergill S.S., Samson G., Bays P.M., Frith C.D., Wolpert D.M. Evidence for sensory prediction deficits in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 2005, 162:2384-2386.
32. Sherman S.M. Thalamic relays and cortical functioning. Prog. Brain Res. 2005, 149:107-126.
33. Simons C.J., Tracy D.K., Sanghera K.K., O'Daly O., Gilleen J., Dominguez M.D., Krabbendam L., Shergill S.S. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of inner speech in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 2010, 67:232-237.
34. Sperry R.W. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1950, 43:482-489.
35. Steffener J., Tabert M., Reuben A., Stern Y. Investigating hemodynamic response variability at the group level using basis functions. Neuroimage 2010, 49:2113-2122.
36. Valenza N., Ptak R., Zimine I., Badan M., Lazeyras F., Schnider A. Dissociated active and passive tactile shape recognition: a case study of pure tactile apraxia. Brain 2001, 124:2287-2298.
37. von Holst E., Mittelstaedt H. Das Reafferenzprincip. Naturwissenschaft 1950, 37(37):464-476.
38. Voss M., Ingram J.N., Haggard P., Wolpert D.M. Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:26-27.
39. Weiskrantz L., Elliott J., Darlington C. Preliminary observations on tickling oneself. Nature 1971, 230:598-599.
40. White T.P., Francis S.T., Joseph V., O'Regan E., Head K.E., Liddle P.F. Evidence for reduced somatosensory lateralisation and focalisation in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2009, 174:24-31.
41. Wild C.J., Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Human auditory cortex is sensitive to the perceived clarity of speech. Neuroimage 2012, 60:1490-1502.
42. Witt S.T., Laird A.R., Meyerand M.E. Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: an ALE meta-analysis. Neuroimage 2008, 42:343-356.
43. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1997, 1:209-216.
44. Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11:R729-R732.
45. Wolpert D.M., Miall R.C. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 1996, 9:1265-1279.