|
Volumn 309, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 349-350
|
Tension between quality measurement, public quality reporting, and pay for performance
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BILLING AND CLAIMS;
DOCUMENTATION;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HEALTH CARE PLANNING;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM;
HOSPITAL;
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
MEDICARE;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PAY FOR PERFORMANCE;
PHYSICIAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PUBLIC QUALITY REPORTING;
REIMBURSEMENT;
SHORT SURVEY;
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;
ARTICLE;
ECONOMICS;
INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
STANDARD;
STATISTICS;
UNITED STATES;
DATA COLLECTION;
DISCLOSURE;
HEALTH POLICY;
INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES;
MEDICARE;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;
QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE;
REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
UNITED STATES;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 84872763158
PISSN: 00987484
EISSN: 15383598
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.191276 Document Type: Short Survey |
Times cited : (44)
|
References (8)
|