Wireless substitution: State-level estimates from the national health interview survey, January 2007-June 2010

National Health Statistics Reports

Volumn , Issue 39, 2011, Pages

  Blumberg, Stephen J ^a   Luke, Julian V ^a   Ganesh, Nadarajasundaram ^b   Davern, Michael E ^b   Boudreaux, Michel H ^c   Soderberg, Karen ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell phones; Noncoverage; Small domain estimation; Telephone surveys

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE PHONE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CELLULAR PHONE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS (U.S.); UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872761472     PISSN: 21648344     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates based on data from the National Health Interview Survey, January-June 2010. National Center for Health Statistics. December 2010. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ nchs/nhis.htm.
2. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Coverage bias in traditional telephone surveys of low-income and young adults. Public Opin Q 71(5):734-49. 2007.
3. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML. Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys. Am J Public Health 99(10):1806-10. 2009.
4. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML, Frankel MR. Recent trends in household telephone coverage in the United States. In: Lepkowski JM, Tucker C, Brick JM, et al., eds. Advances in telephone survey methodology: 56-86. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2007.
5. AAPOR Cell Phone Task Force. New considerations for survey researchers when planning and conducting RDD telephone surveys in the U.S. with respondents reached via cell phone numbers [online]. American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2010. Available from: http://aapor.org/cell_phone_ task_force.htm.
6. Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Davidson G, et al. Wireless substitution: State-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January-December 2007. National health statistics reports; no 14. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2009. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/ nhsr014.pdf.
7. CDC. National Immunization Survey: A user's guide for the 2008 public-use data file. 2009. Available from: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/ Health_Statistics/NCHS/ Dataset_Documentation/NIS/ NISPUF08_DUG.pdf.
8. Jiang J, Lahiri P. Mixed model prediction and small area estimation (with discussion). Test 15(1):1-96. 2006.
9. Rao JNK. Small area estimation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2003.
10. Rao JNK, Yu M. Small area estimation by combining time-series and cross-section data. Can J Stat 22(4):511-28. 1994.
11. Petitions of Qwest Corporation for forbearance pursuant to 47 U.S.C. §160(c) in the Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Phoenix, and Seattle metropolitan statistical areas. WC Docket No. 07-97, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08-174. Federal Communications Commission. July 25, 2008. Available from: http://hraunfoss. fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/ FCC-08-174A1.pdf.
12. Arbitron, Inc. Cell-phone-only household penetration in Arbitron radio metro areas. 2009. Available from: http://www.arbitron.com/ downloads/cell_phone_penetration _map.pdf.
13. Jiang J, Lahiri P, Wan S-M, Wu C-H. Jackknifing in the Fay-Herriot model with an example. In: Statistical policy working paper 33: Proceedings of the Seminar on Funding Opportunity in Survey Research; 98-104. Washington, DC: Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, Office of Management and Budget. 2001.
14. 2 measures based on Wald and likelihood ratio joint significance tests. Am Stat 44(3):250-3. 1990.