One welfare: A call to develop a broader framework of thought and action

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Volumn 242, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 309-310

  Colonius, Tristan J ^a   Earley, Rosemary W ^a  

^a AAAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872724133     PISSN: 00031488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/javma.242.3.309     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Schoen J W, Miller SD. New strategies for bear conservation: collaboration between resource agencies and environmental organizations. Ursus 2002;13:361-367.
2. Westley F, Vredenburg H. Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. J Org Sci 1997;8:381-403
3. Fraser D. Animal welfare, values, and mandated science. In: Fraser D, ed. Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural con- text. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008;260-274.
4. Mellor DJ, Bayvel ACD. New Zealand's inclusive science-based system for setting animal welfare standards. J Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;113:313-329.
5. Johnston BR. Human rights and the environment. J Hum Ecol 1995;23:110-123.
6. Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE Jr. Using psychology to save biodi- versity and human well-being. Conserv Biol 2006;20:702-705.
7. Dawkins MS. Evolution and animal welfare. Q Rev Biol 1998;73:305-327.
8. Boettke PJ. Controversy: is economics a moral science? A re- sponse to Richard F Crespo. J Markets Morality 1998;1:212-219.
9. Lusk JL, Norwood FB. Animal welfare economics. J Appl Econ Pers Policy 2011;22:1-21.
10. Tonsor GT, Wolf CA. Drivers of resident support for animal care oriented ballot initiatives. J Agric Appl Econ 2010;42:3.
11. O'Riordan T. Environmental science, sustainability, and politics. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2004;29:234-247.
12. Adam S, Kriesi H. The network approach. In: Sabatier PA, ed. Theories of the policy process. Cambridge, England: Westview Press, 2007;129-154.
13. Coleman WD, Skogstad GD, Atkinson MM. Paradigms shifts and policy networks: cumulative change in agriculture. J Public Policy 1996;16:273-301.
14. World Health Organization Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. WHOQOL: measuring quality of life. Available at: www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf. Accessed Aug 28, 2012.
15. Power M, Bullinger M, Harper A. The World Health Organi- zation WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. J Health Psychol 1999;18:495-505.
16. Broom DM. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci 1991;69:4167-4175.
17. Dennett D. On failures of freedom & the fear of science. Daeda- lus 2003;132:126-130.
18. Larkin M. Pioneering a profession: the birth of veterinary education in the Age of Enlightenment. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011;238:8-11.
19. AVMA. Veterinarian's oath. Available at: www.avma.org/about_ avma/whoweare/oath.asp. Accessed Jul 1, 2012.
20. National Research Council. Workforce needs in veterinary medi- cine. Washington, DC: National Academies of Science, 2012.
21. Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The advocacy coalition framework: inno- vations and clarifications. In: Sabatier PA, ed. Theories of the policy process. Cambridge, England: Westview Press, 2007;189-220.
22. Bayvel ACD, Cross N. Animal welfare: a complex domestic and international public-policy issue-who are the key players? J Vet Med Educ 2010;37:3-12.
23. Maccready P. An ambivalent luddite at a technological feast. 1999. Available at: www.designfax.net/archives/0899/899trl_2. asp. Accessed Aug 28, 2012.