Dry anaerobic digestion of food waste under mesophilic conditions: Performance and methanogenic community analysis

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 131, Issue , 2013, Pages 210-217

  Cho, Si Kyung ^a   Im, Wan Taek ^a   Kim, Dong Hoon ^b   Kim, Moon Hwan ^c   Shin, Hang Sik ^a   Oh, Sae Eun ^c  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER)   (South Korea)

^c Hanbat National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dry anaerobic digestion; Food waste; Methanosarcina; Microbial community; Pyrosequencing

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

454-PYROSEQUENCING; ANAEROBIC DIGESTER; DRY CONDITION; FOOD WASTE; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MESOPHILIC CONDITION; METHANOGENIC COMMUNITY; METHANOSARCINA; METHANOSARCINA THERMOPHILA; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; PRODUCTION RATES; PYROSEQUENCING; REDUCTION RATE; SEED SLUDGES; VOLATILE SOLID;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOOD; GAS PRODUCTION; METHANE; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REACTION RATE; REDUCTION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; VOLATILE SUBSTANCE; WASTE TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; HYDRAULIC PERMEABILITY; MESOPHILE; METHANOCULLEUS BOURGENSIS; METHANOSARCINA THERMOPHILA; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROSEQUENCING; SLUDGE; SOLID WASTE; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 84872720376     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.100     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abbassi-Guendouz A., Brockmann D., Trably E., Dumas C., Delgenès J.P., Steyer J.P., Escudié R. Total solids content drives high solid anaerobic digestion via mass transfer limitation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111:55-61.
2. Ahn J.H., Do T.T., Kim S.D., Hwang S.H. The effects of calcium on the anaerobic digestion treating swine wastewater. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 30:33-38.
3. APHA, AWWA and WEF, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed., American Public Health Association, Baltimore, pp. 257-259.
4. Behera S.K., Kim D.H., Shin H.S., Cho S.K., Yoon S.P., Park H.S. Enhanced methane recovery by food waste leachate injection into a landfill in Korea. Waste Manage. 2011, 31:2126-2132.
5. Bolzonella D., Innocenti L., Pavan P., Traverso P., Cecchi F. Semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: focusing on the start-up phase. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 86:123-129.
6. Calli B., Mertoglu B., Inanc B., Yenigun O. Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performance of anaerobic bioreactors. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:1285-1292.
7. Chu C.F., Ebie Y., Xu K.Q., Li Y.Y., Inamori Y. Characterization of microbial community in the two-stage process for hydrogen and methane production from food waste. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:8253-8261.
8. Conklin A., Stensel H.D., Ferguson J. Growth kinetics and competition between Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta in mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Water Environ. Res. 2006, 78(5):486-496.
9. DeLong E.F. Archaea in coastal marine environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89:5685-5689.
10. Forster-Carneiro T., Perez M., Romero L.I. Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes: dry thermophilic performance. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:8180-8184.
11. Fernandez Rodriguez J., Perez M., Romero L.I. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: optimisation of the semicontinuous process. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 193-194:10-15.
12. Forster T., Fdéz-Güelfo L.A., Pérez M., Romero L.I., álvarez C.J. Optimization of SEBAC start-up phase of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2004, 18(4):429-439.
13. 2-producing reactor using organic wastes as a feedstock. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37(10):8330-8337.
14. Kaparaju P., Buendia I., Ellegaard L., Angelidakia I. Effects of mixing on methane production during thermophilic anaerobic digestion of manure: lab-scale and pilot-scale studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:4919-4928.
15. Kelleher M. Anaerobic digestion outlook for MSW streams. Biocycle 2007, 48(8):51-55.
16. Kim D.H., Kim S.H., Shin H.S. Sodium inhibition of fermentative hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:3295-3304.
17. Kim D.H., Oh S.E. Continuous high-solids anaerobic co-digestion of organic solid wastes under mesophilic conditions. Waste Manage. 2011, 31:1943-1948.
18. Koster I.W., Lettinga G. The influence of ammonium-nitrogen on the specific activity of palletized methanogenic sludge. Agric. Wastes 1984, 9:205-216.
19. Kugleman I.J., Chin K.K. Toxicity, synergism, and antagonism in anaerobic waste treatment processes. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1971, 105:55-90.
20. Lettinga, G., 1981. Anaerobic digestion of energy saving and production. In: Palz, W., Chartier, P. (Eds.), Energy from Biomass, First E.C. Conference. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London.
21. Li W., Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1658-1659.
22. Luning L., Van Zundert E.H.M., Brinkmann A.J.K. Comparison of dry and wet digestion for solid waste. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48(4):15-20.
23. Mata-Alvarez J., Mace S., Llabres P. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74(1):3-16.
24. Ministry of Environment, 2009. The state of waste generation and treatment in 2008. Seoul, Korea (Report, In Korean).
25. Montero B., Garcia-Morales J.L., Sales D., Solera R. Evolution of microorganisms in thermophilic-dry anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(8):3233-3243.
26. Murray P.A., Zinder Z.H. Nutritional requirements of Methanosarcina sp. strain TM-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 50:49-56.
27. Overas L., Forney L., Daae F.L., Torsvik V. Distribution of bacterioplankton in meromictic Lake Saelenvannet, as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified gene fragments coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63:3367-3373.
28. Schloss P.D., Westcott S.L., Ryabin T., Hall J.R., Hartmann M., Hollister E.B. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:7537-7541.
29. Shin S.G., Han G.S., Lim J.T., Lee C.S., Hwang S.H. A comprehensive microbial insight into two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste-recycling wastewater. Water Res. 2010, 44:4838-4849.
30. Supaphol S., Jenkins S.N., Intomo P., Waite I.S., Donnell A.G. Microbial community dynamics in mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of mixed waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:4021-4027.
31. Vrieze J.D., Hennebel T., Boon N., Verstraete W. Methanosarcina: the rediscovered methanogen for heavy duty biomethanation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 112:1-9.
32. Vyrides I., Santos H., Mingote A., Ray M.J., Stuckey D.C. Are compatible solutes compatible with biological treatment of saline wastewater? Batch and continuous studies using submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (sambrs). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44(19):7437-7442.
33. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones D.L. Optimization of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(17):7928-7940.
34. Zhang L., Jahng D.J. Enhanced anaerobic digestion of piggery wastewater by ammonia stripping: effects of alkali types. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182:536-543.