Facilitating enrollment in a cancer registry through modified consen t procedures: A pilot study

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 71-75

  Mazanec, Susan ^a   Daly, Barbara ^a   Meropol, Neal J ^a   Step, Mary ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Informed consent; Registry

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPREHENSION; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NURSE; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT STUDY; POSTAL MAIL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLICATION; REGISTER;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPREHENSION; CONSENT FORMS; DATA COLLECTION; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; NURSES; OFFICE VISITS; PAMPHLETS; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTAL SERVICE; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84872691287     PISSN: 15562646     EISSN: 15562654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.71     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AHMED, S., BERZON, R. A., REVICKI, D. A., LENDERKING, W. R., MOINPOUR, C. M., BASCH, E. ET AL. (2012). The use of patientreported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care, 50(12), 1060-1070.
2. ARMSTRONG, D., KLINE-ROGERS, E., JANI, S. M., GOLDMAN, E. B., FANG, J., MUKHERJEE, D. ET AL. (2005). Potential impact of the HIPAA privacy rule on data collection in a registry of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(10), 1125-1129. (Pubitemid 40720736)
3. BUCCINI, L. D., IVERSON, D., CAPUTI, P., JONES, C., & GHO, S. (2009). Assessing clinical trial informed consent comprehension in non-cognitively impaired adults: A systematic review. Research Ethics Review, 5(1), 3-8.
4. CELLA, D., RILEY, W., STONE, A., ROTHROCK, N., REEVE, B., YOUNT, S. ET AL. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179-1194.
5. Centers for Disease Control. (n. d.). National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). Retrieved from http://cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/.
6. CLEELAND, C. S. & SLOAN, J. A. for the ASCPRO Organizing Group. (2010). Assessing the symptoms of cancer using patient-reported outcomes (ASCPRO): Searching for standards. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39(6), 1077-1085.
7. CLEELAND, C. S., SLOAN, J. A., CELLA, D., CHEN, C., DUECK, A. C., JANJAN, N. A. ET AL. (2012). Recommendations for including multiple symptoms as endpoints in cancer clinical trials. Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27744
8. COYNE, C. A., XU, R., RAICH, P., PLOMER, K., DIGNAN, M., WENZEL, L. B. ET AL. (2003). Randomized, controlled trial of an easy-toread informed consent statement for clinical trial participation: A study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(5), 836-842. (Pubitemid 46606443)
9. DAVIS, T. C., BERKEL, H. J., HOLCOMBE, R. F., PRAMANIK, S., & DIVERS, S. G. (1998). Informed consent for clinical trials: A comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90(9), 668-674. (Pubitemid 28222140)
10. DENZEN, E. M., BURTON SANTIBÁÑEZ, M. E., MOORE, H., FOLEY, A., GERSTEN, I. D. ET AL. (2012). Easy-to-read informed consent forms for hematopoietic cell transplantation clinical trials. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 18(2), 183-189.
11. GLIKLICH, R. E. & DRYER, N. A. (Eds.). (2010). Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ books/NBK49444/.
12. JOFFE, S., COOK, E. F., CLEARY, P. D., CLARK, J. W., & WEEKS, J. C. (2001). Quality of informed consent: A new measure of understanding among research subjects. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 93(2), 139-147. (Pubitemid 32111992)
13. LITTENBERG, B. & MACLEAN, C. D. (2006). Passive consent for clinical research in the age of HIPAA. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(3), 207-211.
14. National Cancer Institute. (n. d.[a]). Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results. Retrieved from http://seer.cancer.gov/.
15. National Cancer Institute. (n. d.[b]). Simplification of informed consent documents. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/patientsafety/ simplification-of-informedconsent-docs.
16. OSOBA, D. (2011). Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 3(2), 57-71.
17. RUBINSTEIN, Y. R., GROFT, S. C., CHANDROS, S. H., KANESHIRO, J., KARP, B., LOCKHART, N. C. ET AL. (2012). Informed consent process for patient participation in rare disease registries linked to biorepositories. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 33(1), 5-11.
18. TU, J. V., WILLISON, D. J., SILVER, F. L., FANG, J., RICHARDS, J. A., LAUPACIS, A., & KAPRAL, M. K. (2004). Investigators in the registry of the Canadian Stroke Network: Impracticability of informed consent in the registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(14), 1414-1421. (Pubitemid 38419995)
19. United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Code of Federal Regulations. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/ guidance/45cfr46.html/.
20. United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). ANPRM for revisions to Common Rule. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/ anprm2011page.html.
21. WALTERS, S. R. (2012). Demonstrating value: Registries and beyond. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 22(1), 135-145.
22. YUVAL, R., HALON, D. A., MERDLER, A., KHADER, N., KARKABI, B., UZIEL, K., & LEWIS, B. S. (2000). Patient comprehension and reaction to participating in a double-blind randomized clinical trial (ISIS-4) in acute myocardial infarction. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160(8), 1142-1146. (Pubitemid 30227024)