A mathematical model for the inhibitory effects of lignin in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 130, Issue , 2013, Pages 757-762

  Newman, Roger H ^a   Vaidya, Alankar A ^a   Campion, Sylke H ^a  

^a SCION   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Enzymatic hydrolysis; Enzyme deactivation; Softwood; Steam explosion

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOFTWOODS;

ADJUSTABLE PARAMETERS; ENZYME DEACTIVATION; ENZYME LOADING; FIRST ORDER KINETICS; INCUBATION TEMPERATURES; INCUBATION TIME; INHIBITORY EFFECT; LIGNO-CELLULOSICS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; PINE WOODS; PURE CELLULOSE; STEAM EXPLOSION; TIME DEPENDENCE;

LOADING;

LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

BIOMASS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; NUMERICAL MODEL; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; WOOD;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DRUG EFFECT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; INCUBATION TEMPERATURE; INCUBATION TIME; INHIBITION KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; WOOD;

CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; ENZYMOLYSIS; EXPLOSION; LOADING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOFTWOODS; STEAM;

EID: 84872671219     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.122     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker J.O., Tatsumoto K., Grohmann K., Woodward J., Wichert J.M., Shoemaker S.P., Himmel M.E. Thermal denaturation of Trichoderma reesei cellulases studied by differential scanning calorimetry and tryptophan fluorescence. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1992, 34(35):217-231.
2. Basu S.N., Pal P.N. An unfavourable effect of shaking on fungal cellulases. Nature 1956, 178:312-313.
3. Börjesson J., Peterson R., Tjerneld F. Enhanced enzymatic conversion of softwood lignocellulose by poly(ethylene glycol) addition. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 40:754-762.
4. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
5. Cullis I.F., Mansfield S.D. Optimized delignification of wood-derived lignocellulosics for improving enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 106:884-893.
6. Eklund R., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Optimization of temperature and enzyme concentration in the enzymatic saccharification of steam-pretreated willow. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1990, 12:225-228.
7. Esteghlalian A., Bilodeau M., Mansfield S.D., Saddler J.N. Do enzymatic hydrolyzability and Simon's stain reflect the changes in the accessibility of lignocellulosic substrates to cellulase enzymes?. Biotechnol. Prog. 2001, 17:1047-1054.
8. Ghose T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59:257-268.
9. Gusakov A.V., Sinitsyn A.P., Manakova J.A., Protas O.V. Enzymatic saccharification of industrial and agricultural lignocellulosic wastes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1992, 34(35):625-637.
10. Hansen M.A.T., Kristensen J.B., Felby C., Jorgensen H. Pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw (Triticum aetivum L.) - the impact of lignin relocation and plant tissues on enzymatic accessibility. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:2804-2811.
11. Hong J., Ladisch M.R., Gong C.S., Wankat P.C., Tsao G.T. Combined product and substrate inhibition equation for cellobiase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23:2779-2788.
12. Inoue H., Yano S., Endo T., Sakaki T., Sawayama S. Combining hot-compresed water and ball milling pretreatments to improve the efficiency of the enzymatic hydrolysis of eucalyptus. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2008, 1:2.
13. Kim M.H., Lee S.B., Ryu D.D.Y., Reese E.T. Surface deactivation of cellulase and its prevention. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1982, 4:99-103.
14. Kumar R., Wyman C. Does change in accessibility with conversion depend on both the substrate and pretreatment technology?. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:4193-4202.
15. Kumar L., Chandra S., Chung P.A., Saddler J. Can the same steam pretreatment conditions be used for most softwoods to achieve good, enzymatic hydrolysis and sugar yields?. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7827-7833.
16. Lu Y., Yang B., Gregg D., Saddler J.N., Mansfield S.D. Cellulase adsorption and an evaluation of enzyme recycle during hydrolysis of steam-exploded softwood residues. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2002, 98-200:641-654.
17. Luo X., Zhu J.Y. Effects of drying-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2011, 48:92-99.
18. Mabee W., Gregg D., Arato C., Berlin A., Bura R., Gilkes N., Mirochnik O., Pan X., Pye E., Saddler J. Updates on softwood-to-ethanol process development. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2006, 129:55-70.
19. Mansfield S.D., Mooney C., Saddler J.N. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Prog. 1999, 15:804-816.
20. Pan X. Role of functional groups in lignin inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose. J. Biobased Mat. Bioeng. 2008, 2:25-32.
21. Pettersen R.C., Schwandt V.H. Wood sugar analysis by anion chromatography. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 1991, 11:495-501.
22. Sattler W., Esterbauer H., Glatter O., Steiner W. The effect of enzyme concentration on the rate of the hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1989, 33:1221-1234.
23. Sewalt V.J.H., Glasser W.G., Fontenot J.P., Allen V.G. Lignin impact on fibre degradation: 1 - Quinone methide intermediates formed from lignin during in vivo fermentation of corn stover. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1996, 71:195-203.
24. Shen J., Agblevor F.A. Kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded cotton gin waste. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2008, 195:1107-1121.
25. Sinitsyn A.P., Clesceri L.S., Bungay H.R. Inhibition of cellulases by impurities in steam-exploded wood. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1982, 7:455-458.
26. Taneda D., Ueno Y., Ikeo M., Okino S. Characteristics of enzyme hydrolysis of cellulose under static condition. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 121:154-160.
27. Tengborg C., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Influence of enzyme loading and physical parameters on the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Biotechnol. Prog. 2001, 17:110-117.
28. Wang Z., Feng H. Fractal kinetic analysis of the enzymatic saccharification of cellulose under different conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7995-8000.
29. Ximenes E., Kim Y., Mosier N., Dien B., Ladisch M. Inhibition of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2010, 46:170-176.
30. Ximenes E., Kim Y., Mosier N., Dien B., Ladisch M. Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2011, 48:54-60.
31. Ye Z., Berson R.E. Kinetic modeling of cellulose hydrolysis with first order inactivation of adsorbed cellulase. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:11194-11199.
32. Zhang Y.-H.P., Lynd L.R. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88:797-824.
33. Zhang Y.-H.P., Himmel M.E., Mielenz J.R. Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24:452-481.
34. Zhang Y., Xu J.-L., Xu H.-J., Yuan Z.-H., Guo Y. Cellulase deactivation based kinetic modeling of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8261-8266.
35. Zhou W., Schuttler H.-B., Hao Z., Xu Y. Cellulose hydrolysis in evolving substrate morphologies I: a general modeling formalism. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 104:261-274.