Taxonomic revision of Ustilago, Sporisorium and Macalpinomyces

Persoonia: Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi

Volumn 29, Issue , 2012, Pages 116-132

  McTaggart, A R ^a,b,c,e   Shivas, R G ^a,b   Geering, A D W ^a,b,e   Vanky K ^d   Scharaschkin, T ^a,c  

^a Australia Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES   (Australia)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^d Herbarium Ustilaginales Vánky ^*  (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Smut fungi; Systematics; Taxonomy; Ustilaginaceae; Ustilaginomycotina

Indexed keywords

FUNGI; MACALPINOMYCES; SPORISORIUM; USTILAGINACEAE; USTILAGO;

EID: 84872648352     PISSN: 00315850     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3767/003158512X661462     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brefeld O. 1912. Die Brandpilze und die Brandkrankheiten. V. Untersuchungen aus dem Gesammtgebiete der Mykologie. XV. Commissions-Verlag von Heinrich Schoningh, Munster.
2. Cunnington JH, Vánky K, Shivas RG. 2005. Lundquistia is a synonym of Sporisorium (Ustilaginomycetes). Mycologia Balcanica 2: 95-100.
3. Langdon RFN. 1962. A study of some smuts of Sorghum spp. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 87: 45-50.
4. Langdon RFN, Fullerton RA. 1975. Sorus ontogeny and sporogenesis in some smut fungi. Australian Journal of Botany 23: 915-930.
5. Langdon RFN, Fullerton RA. 1978. The genus Sphacelotheca (Ustilaginales): criteria for its delimination and the consequences thereof. Mycotaxon 6: 421-456.
6. Link HF. 1825. Cryptogamia. Gymnomycetes. Species Plantarum exhibentes Plantas Rite Cognitas ad Genera Relatas. Linne Ca. 2: 1-128.
7. McAlpine D. 1910. The smuts of Australia. Their structure, life history, treatment, and classification. Government Printer, Melbourne.
8. McTaggart AR, Shivas RG, Geering ADW, Callaghan B, Vánky K, Scharaschkin T. 2012a. Soral synapomorphies are significant for the systematics of Sporisorium. Persoonia 29: 63-77.
9. McTaggart AR, Shivas RG, Geering ADW, Vánky K, Scharaschkin T. 2012b. A review of the Ustilago-Sporisorium-Macalpinomyces complex. Persoonia 29: 55-62.
10. Piepenbring M. 2004. Comparative morphology of galls formed by smut fungi and discussion of generic concepts. In: Agerer R, Piepenbring M, Blanz P (eds), Fronteirs in Basidiomycote mycology: 117-164. IHW-Verlag, Eching, Germany.
11. Piepenbring M, Bauer R, Oberwinkler F. 1998. Teliospores of smut fungi - Teliospore connections, appendages, and germ pores studied by electron microscopy; phylogenetic discussion of characteristics of teliospores. Protoplasma 204: 202-218.
12. Shivas RG, Vánky K. 1997. New smuts (Ustilaginales) on grasses from Western Australia. Mycological Research 101: 835-840.
13. Shivas RG, Vánky K. 2001. The smut fungi on Cynodon, including Sporisorium normanensis sp. nov. from Australia. Fungal Diversity 8: 149-154.
14. Stevens PF. 2001. 'Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 9, June 2008.' Retrieved 18 September 2010, from http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.
15. Stoll M, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of Ustilago, Sporisorium, and related taxa based on combined analyses of rDNA sequences. Mycological Research 109: 342-356.
16. Stoll M, Piepenbring M, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F. 2003. Molecular phylogeny of Ustilago and Sporisorium species (Basidiomycota, Ustilaginales) based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany 81: 976-984.
17. Vánky K. 1985. Carpathian Ustilaginales. Acta Univ. Upsal., Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 24: 1-309.
18. Vánky K. 1990. Taxonomical studies on Ustilaginales. VI. Mycotaxon 38: 267-278.
19. Vánky K. 1991. Spore morphology in the taxonomy of Ustilaginales. Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan 32: 381-400.
20. Vánky K. 1994a. European smut fungi. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Jena, New York.
21. Vánky K. 1994b. Taxonomical studies on Ustilaginales. XI. Mycotaxon 51: 153-174.
22. Vánky K. 1995. Taxonomical studies on Ustilaginales. XIII. Mycotaxon 56: 197-216.
23. Vánky K. 1997. Taxonomical studies on Ustilaginales. XV. Mycotaxon 62: 127-150.
24. Vánky K. 1998. New Australasian Ustilaginales. Mycotaxon 68: 327-344.
25. Vánky K. 2000. Taxonomical studies on Ustilaginales. XX. Mycotaxon 74: 161-215.
26. Vánky K. 2001a. Lundquistia, a new genus of Ustilaginomycetes. Mycotaxon 77: 371-374.
27. Vánky K. 2001b. The new classification of the smut fungi, exemplified by Australasian taxa. Australian Systematic Botany 14: 385-394.
28. Vánky K. 2002. Illustrated genera of smut fungi. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
29. Vánky K. 2003a. The smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes) of Hyparrhenia (Poaceae). Fungal Diversity 12: 179-205.
30. Vánky K. 2003b. Taxonomical studies on Ustilaginales. XXIII. Mycotaxon 85: 1-65.
31. Vánky K. 2004. New smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes) from Mexico, and the genus Lundquistia. Fungal Diversity 17: 159-190.
32. Vánky K. 2005. Taxonomic studies on Ustilaginomycetes. 25. Mycotaxon 91: 217-272.
33. Vánky K, Shivas RG. 2003. Further new smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes) from Australia. Fungal Diversity 14: 243-264.