The Scotch broom, Cytisus scoparius (Fabaceae), a paradox in Denmark - an invasive plant or endangered native species?

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 171, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 429-440

  Rosenmeier, Lars ^a   Kjær, Erik D ^a   Nielsen, Lene R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Morphology; Native; Nuclear microsatellites; Plastid microsatellites

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC MARKER; INVASIVE SPECIES; INVASIVENESS; LEGUME; NATIVE SPECIES; PLASTID; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TAXONOMY;

DENMARK;

CYTISUS; CYTISUS SCOPARIUS; FABACEAE;

EID: 84872611445     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01319.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aguinagalde I, Hampe A, Mohanty A, Martín JP, Duminil J, Petit RJ. 2005. Effects of life-history traits and species distribution on genetic structure at maternally inherited markers in European trees and shrubs. Journal of Biogeography 32: 329-339.
2. Böcher TW, Larsen K. 1958. Secondary polyploidy and ecotypical differentiation in Sarothamnus scoparius. New Phytologist 57: 311-317.
3. Buchwald E. 2008. Gyvel - dansk, italiensk eller invasiv. Urt 32: 88-95. [in Danish].
4. Citharel J, Citharel L. 1986. Comparative studies on the sub-unit composition of the albumins, vicilins and legumins of isolated protein bodies from cotyledons of dry seeds of two members of the Leguminosae: Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link and C. scoparius ssp. maritimus (Rouy) Heywood. New Phytologist 102: 65-72.
5. Daehler CC, Strong DR. 1997. Hybridization between introduced smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora, Poaceae) and native California cordgrass (Spartina foliosa) in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. American Journal of Botany 85: 607-611.
6. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611-2620.
7. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47-50.
8. Gaertner M, Breeyen AD, Hui C, Richardson DM. 2009. Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Progress in Physical Geography 33: 319-338.
9. Gladieux P, Guérin F, Giraud T, Caffier V, Lemaire C, Parisi L, Didelot F, Le Cam B. 2011. Emergence of novel fungal pathogens by ecological speciation: importance of the reduced viability of immigrants. Molecular Ecology 20: 4521-4532.
10. Graudal L, Kjær ED, Canger S. 1995. A systematic approach to the conservation of genetic resources of trees and shrubs in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management 73: 117-134.
11. Isaac NJB, Mallet J, Mace GM. 2004. Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 464-469.
12. Kalinowski ST. 2005. HP-Rare: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic diversity. Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 187-189.
13. Kang M, Buckley YM, Lowe AJ. 2007a. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci for the invasive plant Cytisus scoparius. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 100-102.
14. Kang M, Lowe AJ, Buckley YM. 2007b. Testing the role of genetic factors across multiple independent invasions of the shrub Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius). Molecular Ecology 16: 4662-4672.
15. Magda D, Chambon-Dubreuil E, Agreil D, Gleizes B, Jarry M. 2009. Demographic analysis of a dominant shrub (Cytisus scoparius): prospects for encroachment control. Basic and Applied Ecology 10: 631-639.
16. Malo JE. 2004. Potential ballistic dispersal of Cytisus scoparius (Fabaceae) seeds. Australian Journal of Botany 52: 653-658.
17. May RM. 1988. How many species are there on Earth? Science 241: 1441-1449.
18. Meyerson LA, Mooney HA. 2007. Invasive alien species in an era of globalization. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 199-208.
19. Mooney HA, Cleland EE. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 98: 5446-5451.
20. Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Parker IM. 1997. Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology 78: 1457-1470.
22. Parker IM. 2000. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach. Ecological Applications 10: 726-743.
23. Pauchard A, Shea K. 2006. Integrating the study of non-native plant invasions across spatial scales. Biological Invasions 8: 399-413.
24. Paulli S. 1648. Flora danica, det er dansk urtebog. Copenhagen: Melchiore Marzan [in Danish].
25. Pautasso M, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Holdenrieder O, Pietravalle S, Salama N, Jeger MJ, Lange E, Hehl-Lange S. 2010. Plant health and global change - some implications for landscape management. Biological Reviews 85: 729 -755.
26. Paynter Q, Fowler SV, Memmott J, Sheppard AW. 1998. Factors affecting the establishment of Cytisus scoparius in southern France: implications for managing both native and exotic populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 582-595.
27. Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288-295.
28. Peterson DJ, Prasad R. 1998. The biology of Canadian weeds. 109. Cytisus scoparius L (Link.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78: 497-504.
29. Petit RJ, Duminil J, Fineschi S, Hampe A, Salvini D, Vendramin GG. 2005. Comparative organization of chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear diversity in plant populations. Molecular Ecology 14: 689-701.
30. Potter KJB, Kriticos DJ, Watt MS, Leriche A. 2009. The current and future potential distribution of Cytisus scoparius: a weed of pastoral systems, natural ecosystems and plantation forestry. Weed Research 49: 271-282.
31. Powell KI, Chase JM, Knight TM. 2011. A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. American Journal of Botany 98: 539-548.
32. Prentis P, White EM, Lowe AJ, Clarke AR. 2007. Can hybridization cause local extinction: a case for demographic swamping of the Australian native Senecio pinnatifolius by the invasive Senecio madagascariensis? New Phytologist 176: 902-912.
33. Prevosto B, Dambrine E, Coquillard P, Robert A. 2006. Broom (Cytisus scoparius) colonization after grazing abandonment in the French Massif Central: impact on vegetation composition and resource availability. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology 30: 258-268.
34. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
35. Rees M, Paynter Q. 1997. Biological control of Scotch broom: modelling the determinants of abundance and the potential impact of introduced insect herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 1203-1221.
36. Rice WR. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
37. Rousseau S, Loiseau P. 1982. Structure and development of the populations of Cytisus scoparius L in the Chaine des Puys (France). Acta Oecologica-Oecologia Applicata 3: 155-168.
38. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 406-425.
39. SAS. 2008. SAS software, version 9.2. Cari, NC: SAS Institute, Inc..
40. Skov- og Naturstyrelsen. 2008. UDKAST til Handlingsplan for invasive arter. Available at: http://www.mim.dk/NR/rdonlyres/64817DD7-FFF2-449A-B718-C2E7944E6817/0/InvasivHplan.pdf [in Danish].
41. Skov- og Naturstyrelsen. 2009. Handlingsplan for invasive arter. Available at: http://www.skovognatur.dk/NR/rdonlyres/DB812145-4733-4D7F-95AA-9EB940A61D1E/0/Handlingsplanforinvasivearter2.pdf [in Danish].
42. Suetsugu K, Takeuchi Y, Futai K, Kato M. 2012. Host selectivity, haustorial anatomy and impact of the invasive parasite Parentucellia viscosa on floodplain vegetative communities in Japan. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 170: 69-78.
43. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 28: 2731-2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121.
44. Turner JH. 1933. The viability of seeds. Kew Bulletin 1933: 257-269.
45. Vilà M, Weber E, D'Antonio CM. 2000. Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biological Invasions 2: 207-217.
46. Wahlund S. 1928. Zusammensetzung von Populationen und Korrelationserscheinungen vom Standpunkt der Vererbungslehre aus betrachtetz. Hereditas 11: 65-106.
47. Weir BS. 1990. Genetic data analysis. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
48. Weising K, Gardner RC. 1999. A set of conserved PCR primers for the analysis of simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in chloroplast genomes of dicotyledonous angiosperms. Genome 42: 9-19.