Poised to prosper? A cross-system comparison of climate change effects on native and non-native species performance

Ecology Letters

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 261-270

  Sorte, Cascade J B ^a   Ibáñez, Ines ^b   Blumenthal, Dana M ^c   Molinari, Nicole A ^d   Miller, Luke P ^e   Grosholz, Edwin D ^f   Diez, Jeffrey M ^g   D'Antonio, Carla M ^d   Olden, Julian D ^h   Jones, Sierra J ⁱ   Dukes, Jeffrey S ^j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^j PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Climate change; CO2; Effect size; Forecasting; Global warming; Invasive species; Meta analysis; Performance; Precipitation; Resource utilisation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE EFFECT; DATABASE; FORECASTING METHOD; GLOBAL WARMING; INVASIVE SPECIES; META-ANALYSIS; NATIVE SPECIES; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); RESOURCE USE; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEM;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; INTRODUCED SPECIES; META ANALYSIS; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPERATURE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; TEMPERATURE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84872606181     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12017     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. 2. New Phytol., 165, 351-372.
2. 2] depends on differential responses of dominant invasive species and is mediated by soil water availability. New Phytol., 161, 827-835.
3. Blumenthal, D. (2006). Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion. Ecol. Lett., 9, 887-895.
4. Blumenthal, D., Chimner, R.A., Welker, J.M. & Morgan, J.A. (2008). Increased snow facilitates plant invasion in mixed grass prairie. New Phytol., 179, 440-448.
5. Bradley, B., Wilcove, D. & Oppenheimer, M. (2010). Climate change increases risk of plant invasion in the Eastern United States. Biol. Invasions, 12, 1855-1872.
6. Bradley, B.A., Blumenthal, D.M., Early, R., Grosholz, E.D., Lawler, J.J., Miller, L.P. et al. (2012). Global change, global trade, and the next wave of plant invasions. Front. Ecol. Environ., 10, 20-28.
7. Byers, J.E. (2002). Impact of non-indigenous species on natives enhanced by anthropogenic alteration of selection regimes. Oikos, 97, 449-458.
8. Clark, J.S. & Gelfand, A.E. (2006). A future for models and data in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 375-380.
9. Crooks, J.A. (1998). Habitat alteration and community-level effects of an exotic mussel. Musculista senhousia Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser., 162, 137-152.
10. Daehler, C.C. (2003). Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 34, 183-211.
11. D'Antonio, C.M. & Vitousek, P.M. (1992). Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 23, 63-87.
12. Davidson, A.M., Jennions, M. & Nicotra, A.B. (2011). Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett., 14, 419-431.
13. Davis, M.A., Grime, J.P. & Thompson, K. (2000). Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol., 88, 528-534.
14. Deutsch, C.A., Tewksbury, J.J., Huey, R.B., Sheldon, K.S., Ghalambor, C.K., Haak, D.C. et al. (2008). Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 6668-6672.
15. Diez, J.M., D'Antonio, C.M., Dukes, J.S., Grosholz, E.D., Olden, J.D., Sorte, C.J.B. et al. (2012). Will extreme climatic events facilitate biological invasions? Front. Ecol. Environ., 10, 249-257.
16. Dukes, J.S. & Mooney, H.A. (1999). Does global change increase the success of biological invaders?. Trends Ecol. Evol., 14, 135-139.
17. Dukes, J.S., Chiariello, N.R., Loarie, S.R. & Field, C.B. (2011). Strong response of an invasive plant species (Centaurea solstitialis L.) to global environmental changes. Ecol. Appl., 21, 1887-1894.
18. Gelman, A. & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using Regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
19. González, A.L., Kominoski, J.S., Danger, M., Ishida, S., Iwai, N. & Rubach, A. (2010). Can ecological stoichiometry help explain patterns of biological invasions? Oikos, 119, 779-790.
20. Grotkopp, E., Erskine-Ogden, J. & Rejmánek, M. (2010). Assessing potential invasiveness of woody horticultural plant species using seedling growth rate traits. J. Appl. Ecol., 47, 1320-1328.
21. Harsch, M.A., Hulme, P.E., McGlone, M.S. & Duncan, R.P. (2009). Are treelines advancing? A global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecol. Lett., 12, 1040-1049.
22. Hellmann, J.J., Byers, J.E., Bierwagen, B.G. & Dukes, J.S. (2008). Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv. Biol., 22, 534-543.
23. Hoeppner, S.S. & Dukes, J.S. (2012). Interactive responses of old-field plant growth and composition to warming and precipitation. Glob. Change Biol., 18, 1754-1768.
24. Huang, D., Haack, R.A. & Zhang, R. (2011). Does global warming increase establishment rates of invasive alien species? A centurial time series analysis. PLoS ONE, 6, e24733.
25. van Kleunen, M., Manning, J.C., Pasqualetto, V. & Johnson, S.D. (2008). Phylogenetically independent associations between autonomous self-fertilization & plant invasiveness. Am. Nat., 171, 195-201.
26. van Kleunen, M., Weber, E. & Fischer, M. (2010). A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett., 13, 235-245.
27. Lockwood, B.L. & Somero, G.N. (2011). Invasive and native blue mussels (genus Mytilus) on the California coast: the role of physiology in a biological invasion. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 400, 167-174.
28. Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A. & Best, N. (2009). The BUGS project: Evolution, critique, and future directions. Stat. Med., 28, 3049-3067.
29. Luo, Y., Su, B., Currie, W.S., Dukes, J.S., Finzi, A.C., Hartwig, U. et al. (2004). Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Bioscience, 54, 731-739.
30. Mila, A.L. & Ngugi, H.K. (2011). A Bayesian Approach to Meta-Analysis of Plant Pathology Studies. Phytopathology, 101, 42-51.
31. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A. (2007). Global change and marine communities: Alien species and climate change. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 55, 342-352.
32. Orr, J.C., Fabry, V.J., Aumont, O., Bopp, L., Doney, S.C., Feely, R.A. et al. (2005). Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature, 437, 681-686.
33. Osenberg, C.W., Sarnelle, O. & Cooper, S.D. (1997). Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis. Am. Nat., 150, 798-812.
34. Osenberg, C.W., Sarnelle, O., Cooper, S.D. & Holt, R.D. (1999). Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: Goals, metrics, and models. Ecology, 80, 1105-1117.
35. Parker, I.M., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Goodell, K., Wonham, M., Kareiva, P.M. et al. (1999). Impact: Toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol. Invasions, 1, 3-19.
36. Parmesan, C. (2006). Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 37, 637-669.
37. Pörtner, H.O. & Knust, R. (2007). Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance. Science, 315, 95-97.
38. Pullin, A.S. & Knight, T.M. (2009). Doing more good than harm- Building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biol. Conserv., 142, 931-934.
39. Pullin, A.S. & Stewart, G.B. (2006). Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv. Biol., 20, 1647-1656.
40. Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Pergl, J., Jarosík, V., Sixtová, Z. & Weber, E. (2008). Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 237-244.
41. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.
42. Rahel, F.J. & Olden, J.D. (2008). Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conserv. Biol., 22, 521-533.
43. Rasband, W.S. (2009). ImageJ. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda. Available at: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/. Accessed 22 April 2011.
44. Rejmánek, M. & Richardson, D.M. (1996). What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology, 77, 1655-1661.
45. Richardson, D.M., Pyŝek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D. & West, C.J. (2000). Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib., 6, 93-107.
46. Root, T.L., Price, J.T., Hall, K.R., Schneider, S.H., Rosenzweig, C. & Pounds, J.A. (2003). Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature, 421, 57-60.
47. Sala, O.E., Chapin, F.S. III, Armesto, J.J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R. et al. (2000). Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770-1774.
48. SAS Institute. (2008). SAS Version 9.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
49. Seager, R. & Vecchi, G.A. (2010). Greenhouse warming and the 21st century hydroclimate of southwestern North America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 21277-21282.
50. 2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature, 408, 79-81.
51. Somero, G.N. (2012). The physiology of global change: linking patterns to mechanisms. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., 4, 39-61.
52. Sorte, C.J.B., Williams, S.L. & Zerebecki, R.A. (2010a). Ocean warming increases threat of invasive species in a marine fouling community. Ecology, 91, 2198-2204.
53. Sorte, C.J.B., Williams, S.L. & Carlton, J.T. (2010b). Marine range shifts and species introductions: comparative spread rates and community impacts. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 19, 303-316.
54. Spiegelhalter, D.J., Best, N., Carlin, B.P. & Linde, A.V.D. (2000). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. Royal Stat. Soc. B, 64, 583-639.
55. Stachowicz, J.J., Terwin, J.R., Whitlatch, R.B. & Osman, R.W. (2002). Linking climate change and biological invasions: Ocean warming facilitates nonindigenous species invasions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 15497-15500.
56. Stewart, G. (2010). Meta-analysis in applied ecology. Biol. Lett., 6, 78-81.
57. Sturtz, S., Ligges, U. & Gelman, A. (2005). R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R. J. Stat. Softw., 12, 1-16.
58. Sweeting, M.J., Sutton, A.J. & Lambert, P.C. (2004). What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Stat. Med., 23, 1351-1375.
59. Terrestrial Carbon (TerraC) Information System. (2011). University of Florida, Gainesville. Available at: http://TerraC.ifas.ufl.edu. Last accessed 14 October 2011.
60. Theoharides, K.A. & Dukes, J.S. (2007). Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol., 176, 256-273.
61. Thomas, A., O'Hara, B., Ligges, U. & Sturtz, S. (2006). Making BUGS open. RNews, 6, 12-17. .
62. Thuiller, W., Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Midgley, G.F., Hughes, G.O. & Rouget, M. (2005). Niche-based modeling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob. Change Biol., 11, 2234-2250.
63. Thuiller, W., Richardson, D.M. & Midgley, G. (2007). Will climate change promote alien plant invasions? In Biological Invasions. (ed. Nentwig, W.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 197-211.
64. Vilà, M., Corbin, J.D., Dukes, J.S., Pino, J. & Smith, S.D. (2007). Linking plant invasions to global environmental change. In Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World. (eds Canadell, J., Pataki, D. Pitelka, L.). Springer, New York, pp. 93-102.
65. Walther, G.R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T.J.C. et al. (2002). Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389-395.
66. Walther, G.R., Roques, A., Hulme, P.E., Sykes, M.T., Pyšek, P., Kuhn, I. et al. (2009). Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol., 24, 686-693.
67. Webber, B.L. & Scott, J.K. (2012). Rapid global change: implications for defining natives and aliens. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr., 21, 305-311.
68. Williams, S.L. & Smith, J.E. (2007). A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 38, 327-359.
69. Willis, C.G., Ruhfel, B.R., Primack, R.B., Miller-Rushing, A.J., Losos, J.B. & Davis, C.C. (2010). Favorable climate change response explains non-native species' success in Thoreau's woods. PLoS ONE, 5, e8878.
70. Witte, S., Buschbaum, C., van Beusekom, J.E.E. & Reise, K. (2010). Does climatic warming explain why an introduced barnacle finally takes over after a lag of more than 50 years? Biol. Invasions, 12, 3579-3589.
71. Wu, Z., Dijkstra, P., Koch, G.W., Peñuelas, J. & Hungate, B.A. (2011). Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: a meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Glob. Change Biol., 17, 927-942.
72. Zerebecki, R.A. & Sorte, C.J.B. (2011). Temperature tolerance and stress proteins as mechanisms of invasive species success. PLoS ONE, 6, e14806.