Individual mating decisions and hybridization

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 252-255

  Rosenthal, G G ^a,b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Centro de Investigaciones Científicas de Las Huastecas 'Aguazarca'   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; HYBRIDIZATION; NOTE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84872579113     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12004     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J.W., Baird, S.J.E., Bierne, N. et al. 2013. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 229-246.
2. Anderson, E. 1948. Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 2: 1-9.
3. Brooks, R. 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406: 67-70.
4. Culumber, Z.W., Fisher, H.S., Tobler, M., Mateos, M., Barber, P.H., Sorenson, M.D. et al. 2011. Replicated hybrid zones of Xiphophorus swordtails along an elevational gradient. Mol. Ecol. 20: 342-356.
5. Doherty, J.A. & Gerhardt, H.C. 1983. Hybrid tree frogs: vocalizations of males and selective phonotaxis of females. Science 220: 1078-1080.
6. Fisher, H.S., Mascuch, S. & Rosenthal, G.G. 2009. Multivariate male traits misalign with multivariate female preferences in the swordtail fish, Xiphophorus birchmanni. Anim. Behav. 78: 265-269.
7. Gröning, J. & Hochkirch, A. 2008. Reproductive interference between animal species. Q. Rev. Biol. 83: 257-282.
8. Hankison, S.J. & Morris, M.R. 2003. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behav. Ecol. 14: 282-287.
9. Hoy, R., Hahn, J. & Paul, R. 1977. Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science 195: 82-84.
10. Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283-327.
11. Kirkpatrick, M. & Hall, D.W. 2004. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58: 683-691.
12. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
13. Pfennig, K.S. 2007. Facultative mate choice drives adaptive hybridization. Science 318: 965-967.
14. Presgraves, D.C. 2008. Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 24: 336-343.
15. Ritchie, M.G. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 79-102.
16. Rosenthal, G.G. & Ryan, M.J. 2011. Conflicting preferences within females: sexual selection versus species recognition. Biol. Lett. 7: 525-527.
17. Rosenthal, G.G. & Stuart-Fox, D. 2012. Environmental disturbance and animal communication. In: Behavioural Responses to a Changing World: Mechanisms and Consequences, (B.B.M. Wong & U. Candolin, eds), pp. 16-31. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
18. Ryan, M.J. & Keddy-Hector, A. 1992. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139: S4-S35.
19. Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647-657.
20. Schlupp, I., Marler, C. & Ryan, M.J. 1994. Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. Science 263: 373-374.
21. Shaw, K.L. & Lesnick, S.C. 2009. Genomic linkage of male song and female acoustic preference QTL underlying a rapid species radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 9737-9742.
22. Stein, A.C. & Uy, J.A.C. 2006. Unidirectional introgression of a sexually selected trait across an avian hybrid zone: a role for female choice? Evolution 60: 1476-1485.
23. Van Homrigh, A., Higgie, M., McGuigan, K. & Blows, M.W. 2007. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection. Curr. Biol. 17: 528-532.
24. Verzijden, M.N., ten Cate, C., Servedio, M.R., Kozak, G.M., Boughman, J.W. & Svensson, E.I. 2012. The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27: 511-519.
25. Wiley, R.H. 2006. Signal detection and animal communication. Adv. Stud. Behav. 36: 217-247.
26. Willis, P.M., Ryan, M.J. & Rosenthal, G.G. 2011. Encounter rates with conspecific males influence female mate choice in a naturally hybridizing fish. Behav. Ecol. 22: 1234-1240.
27. Willis, P.M., Rosenthal, G.G. & Ryan, M.J. 2012. An indirect cue of predation risk counteracts female preference for conspecifics in a naturally hybridizing fish Xiphophorus birchmanni. PLoS ONE 7: e34802.
28. Wirtz, P. 1999. Mother species-father species: unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Anim. Behav. 58: 1-12.