Sustainable surface water management and green infrastructure in UK urban catchment planning

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 24-41

  Ellis, J B ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biofiltration sustainable drainage systems; development planning; green infrastructure; impermeable surface cover; leaf out inventory; urban surface water

Indexed keywords

BIOFILTRATION; CATCHMENT; DRAINAGE; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; SURFACE WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING; WATER MANAGEMENT;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84872574753     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2011.648752     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Asadian, Y. and Weiler, M. 2009. A new approach in measuring rainfall interception by urban trees in coastal British Columbia. Water quality research journal of Canada, 44(1): 16-25.
2. Ashley, R. 2010. "Potential source control and SUDS options: landuse and retrofit options. Appendix E". In In: Needs report. London Tideway Tunnel, Report PNC-00000-900008, London: Thames Water. [online] Available from: http://www.thamestunnel consultation.co.uk/doclib/needs-report-appendix-e [Accessed 21 January 2012]
3. Bath, D. N., Hartley, D. and Jackson, R. 2002. Forest cover, impervious surface area and the mitigation of stormwater impacts. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38(3): 835-845.
4. Brabec, E., Schulte, S. and Richards, P. 2002. Impervious surfaces and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of planning literature, 16: 499-514.
5. CABE. 2010. Urban green nation; building the evidence base, London: Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment.
6. Cappiella, K., Wright, T. and Schueler, T. 2005. Urban watershed forestry manual Vols 1-3, NA-TF-04-05. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
7. Cappiella, K. New approaches to 'greening' stormwater. Proceedings of Water Environment Federation, Sustainability 2008. pp.658-674. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Virginia, US
8. Chocat, B. Urban drainage: out-of-sight-out-of-mind?. Proceedings of the 5th international conference NOVATECH04. Sustainable techniques and strategies in urban water management. July, GRAIE, Lyon, France, 1659-1690
9. Cianfrani, C. M., Hession, W. C. and Rizzo, D. M. 2006. Watershed imperviousness impacts on stream channel condition in SE Pennsylvania. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(4): 941-956.
10. CLG. 2002. Planning for open space, sport and recreation (PPS17), London: Communities and Local Government.
11. CLG. 2006. Development and flood risk. Planning Policy Statement 25 (PPS25), London: Communities and Local Government.
12. CPRE. 2011. Draft national policy framework. A response to the consultation, October. London: Council for the Preservation of Rural England (CPRE). [online] Available from: http://www.cpre.org.uk/resources/housing-and-planning [Accessed November 2011]
13. CWP. 2003. Impacts of impervious cover on aquatic ecosystems Watershed Protection Techniques, Monograph 1. Ellicott City, MD: Center for Watershed Protection
14. Dietz, M. E. and Clausen, J. C. 2005. A field evaluation of raingarden flows and pollutant treatment. Water, air and soil pollution, 167(1/4): 123-138.
15. DTI. 2006. Sustainable drainage systems: a mission for the USA, Global Watch Mission Report. London: Department of Trade & Industry (DTI).
16. ECOTEC. 2008. The economic benefits of green infrastructure: developing key tests for evaluating the benefits of green infrastructure, Warrington: Natural Economy, NorthWest Regional Development Agency (NWDA).
17. Ellis, J. B. 2009a. "Managing urban runoff". In Handbook of catchment management, Edited by: Ferrier, R. and Jenkins, A. 155-182. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
18. Ellis, J. B. Third generation urban surface water drainage: from rooftop to the receiving water sub-catchment. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on urban drainage (ICUD). 31 August-5 September. Edinburgh
19. Ellis, J. B. and Revitt, D. M. 2008. Quantifying diffuse pollution sources and loads for environmental quality standards in urban catchments. Water, air and soil pollution, 8(5/6): 577-585.
20. Ellis, J. B. 2004. Sustainable approaches for urban development and drainage in the 21st century. Journal of the Institute of Civil Engineers; Municipal engineer, 157(ME4): 245-250.
21. Forest Research. 2010. Benefits of green infrastructure, Report WC0807. London: Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA).
22. Gill, S. E. 2007. Adapting cities for climate change: the role of green infrastructure. Built environment, 33: 115-133.
23. Government Office for Science. 2010. Foresight land use futures, Final report. London: Government Office for Science.
24. Hamel, P. Quantifying the restoration of evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge by vegetated infiltration systems. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on urban drainage (ICUD12). September11-16, Porto Alegre, Brazil. London: International Water Association (IWA).
25. Horner, R. R., Lim, H. and Burges, S. J. 2002. Hydrological monitoring of the Seattle ultra-urban stormwater management projects, Technical Report 170, Water Resources Series. University of Washington, Seattle: Department of Civil & Environ Engineering.
26. Horner, R. R. Structural and non-structural BMPs for protecting streams. Linking stormwater BMP designs and performance to receiving water impact mitigation. Proceedings of the Engineering Research Foundation conference, Snowmass, CO. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 60-77. Edited by: Urbonas, B.
27. Hunt, W. F. and Lord, W. G. 2006. Bioretention performance, design, construction and maintenance, AGW-588-05. NC: Urban Waterways, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, State University.
28. Johnson, C. and Penning-Rowsell, E. 2010. What really determines policy? An evaluation of outcome measures for prioritising flood and coastal risk management investment in England. Journal of flood risk management, 3(1): 25-32.
29. Marsalek, J. and Schreir, H. 2009. Innovative approaches to stormwater management in Canada. Water quality research journal of Canada, 44(1): 1-110
30. Pitt, M. 2008. The Pitt Review: lessons learned from the 2007 summer floods, London: Cabinet Office.
31. Pitt, R. Soil structure effects associated with urbanisation and the benefits of soil amendments. Proceedings of the world water & environmental resources conference. Anchorage, Alaska. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
32. Schluter, W. and Jefferies, C. The real issues with in-ground SUDS in Scotland. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on urban drainage (ICUD). August, Copenhagen, Denmark. Edited by: Mikkelson, P. S. London: IWA.
33. Schueler, T. 2004. An integrated framework to restore small urban watersheds Small Watershed Restoration Series, Manual 1. Ellicott City, MD: Centre for Watershed Protection
34. Schueler, T. and Holland, H. K. 2000. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed protection techniques, 1(3): 100-111.
35. Schueler, T. 2007. Urban stormwater retrofit practices, Urban Watershed Restoration Manual No. 3. Ellicott City, MD: Center for Watershed Protection.
36. Skeen, M. Waitakere city vehicle testing station raingarden: stormwater quality monitoring and performance. Proceedings of the world environment & water resource congress; challenges of change. 7th urban watershed management symposium. pp.3154-3164. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
37. TCPA. 2008. The essential role of green infrastructure: green towns green infrastructure worksheet, London: Town & Country Planning Association.
38. Viavattene, C. A GIS based decision support system for the implementation of stormwater best management practices. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on urban drainage (ICUD). August, Edinburgh. CD-ROM.
39. Walker, L. Are UK professionals predisposed to retrofit more sustainable surface water management measures?. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on urban drainage (ICUD12). September11-16, Porto, Alegre, Brazil. London: International Water Association (IWA).
40. Walsh, C. J., Fletcher, T. D. and Ladson, A. R. 2005. Stream restoration in urban catchments through re-designing stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the street. Journal of the North American benthological society, 24(3): 690-705.
41. Wang, L. 2001. Impacts of urbanisation on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales. Environmental management, 28: 255-266.
42. Wang, J., Endreny, J. A. and Novak, D. J. 2008. Mechanistic simulation of tree effects on the urban water balance model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44(1): 75-85.
43. White, I. 2008. The absorbent city: urban form and flood risk management. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Urban design & planning, 161: 151-161.
44. Woods-Ballard, B. 2007. The SUDS manual, London: Construction Industry Research & Information Association (CIRIA). Report RP197