Accuracy of clinical data entry when using a computerized decision support system: A case study with OncoDoc2

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 180, Issue , 2012, Pages 472-476

  Séroussi, Brigitte ^a,b,c,d   Blaszka Jaulerry, Brigitte ^e   Zelek, Laurent ^c,f   Lefranc, Jean Pierre ^a,g   Conforti, Rosa ^g   Spano, Jean Philippe ^a,g   Rousseau, Alexandra ^h   Bouaud, Jacques ^i,j  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

^d APREC   (France)

^e Service de Radiothérapie Oncologie   (France)

^f AVICENNE HOSPITAL   (France)

^g PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^h HÔPITAL SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

ⁱ ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

^j CENTRE DE RECHERCHE DES CORDELIERS   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Clinical decision quality; Computer decision support systems; Evaluation; Patient data accuracy; Unintented consequences

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MEDICAL COMPUTING; NAVIGATION;

CLINICAL DECISION; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; COMPUTERIZED DECISION; EVALUATION; HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (HIT); PATIENT DATA; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; UNINTENTED CONSEQUENCES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FRANCE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FRANCE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84872548552     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-101-4-472     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Love J, Wright A, Simon S, Jenter C, Soran C, Volk L, et al. Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 dec 23.
2. Campbell E, Sittig D, Ash J, Guappone K, and Dykstra R. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc Sep-Oct 2006;13(5):547-56.
3. Weiner J, Kfuri T, Chan K, and Fowles J. "E-iatrogenesis": the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and other HIT. J Am Med Inform Assoc May-Jun 2009;14(3):387-8.
4. Sittig D and Singh H. Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human. Arch Intern Med 2011;171(14):1281-4.
5. Séroussi B, Bouaud J, and Antoine EC. OncoDoc, a successful experiment of computer-supported guideline development and implementation in the treatment of breast cancer. Artif Intell Med 2001;22(1):43-64.
6. Brice J, Friend K, and Delbridge T. Accuracy of EMS-recorded patient demographic data. Prehosp Emerg Care 1998;12(2):187-91.
7. Séroussi B, Falcoff H, Sauquet D, Julien J, and Bouaud J. Role of physicians' reactance in eiatrogenesis: a case study with ASTI guiding mode on the management of hypertension. In: Proc AMIA 2010, Washington, DC. AMIA, November 2010:737-41.
8. Coiera E, Aarts J, and Kulikowski C. The dangerous decade. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19(1):2-5.