The journey to electronic performance measurement

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 158, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 131-132

  Burstin, Helen ^a  

^a NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PNEUMOCOCCUS VACCINE;

ACCURACY; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; EDITORIAL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARDIZATION; WORKFLOW; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY;

EID: 84872516108     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-2-201301150-00009     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. Kern LM, Malhotra S, Barrón Y, Quaresimo J, Dhopeshwarkar R, Pichardo M, et al. Accuracy of electronically reported "meaningful use" clinical quality measures. A cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:77-83.
2. National Quality Forum. Guidance for Measure Testing and Evaluating Scientific Acceptability of Measure Properties. January 2011. Accessed at www.qualityforum.org/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=59116 on 5 December 2012.