Is dispersal limitation more prevalent in the ocean?

Oikos

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 298-300

  Srivastava, Diane S ^a   Kratina, Pavel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISPERSAL; MARINE ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 84872504296     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.21042.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bode M. et al. 2006. Larval dispersal reveals regional sources and sinks in the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 308: 17-25.
2. Carr M. H. et al. 2003. Comparing marine and terrestrial ecosystems: implications for the design of coastal marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 13: S90-S107.
3. Cornell H. V. and Harrison S. P. 2013. Regional effects as important determinants of local diversity in both marine and terrestrial systems. Oikos 122: 288-297.
4. Cottenie K. 2005. Integrating environmental and spatial process in ecological community dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 8: 1175-1182.
5. Fattorini S. 2010. The influence of geographical and ecological factors on island beta diversity patterns. J. Biogeogr. 37: 1061-1070.
6. Hubbell S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203: 1299-1309.
7. Hubbell S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. - Princeton Univ. Press.
8. Hutchinson G. E. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat. 95: 137-145.
9. Kinlan B. P. and Gaines S. D. 2003. Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: a community perspective. Ecology 84: 2007-2020.
10. Lee S. C. and Bruno J. F. 2009. Propagule supply controls grazer community structure and primary production in a benthic marine ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106: 7052-7057.
11. Marshall D. J. et al. 2010. Phenotype-environment mismatch reduces connectivity in the sea. Ecol. Lett. 13: 128-140.
12. Moore R. P. et al. 2008. Experimental evidence for extreme dispersal limitation in tropical forest birds. Ecol. Lett. 11: 960-968.
13. Morgan S. G. et al. 2009. Nearshore larval retention in a region of strong upwelling and recruitment limitation. Ecology 90: 3489-3502.
14. Munguia M. et al. 2008. Dispersal limitation and geographic distributions of mammal species. J. Biogeogr. 35: 1879-1887.
15. Qian H. 2009. Global comparisons of beta diversity among mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians across spatial scales and taxonomic ranks. J. Syst. Evol. 47: 509-514.
16. Shanks A. L. and Eckert G. L. 2005. Population persistence of California Current fishes and benthic crustaceans: a marine drift paradox. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 505-524.
17. Shurin J. B. et al. 2009. Spatial autocorrelation and dispersal limitation in freshwater organisms. Oecologia 159: 151-159.
18. Soininen J. et al. 2007. A multivariate analysis of beta diversity across organisms and environments. Ecology 88: 2830-2838.
19. Svenning J.-C. and Skov F. 2007. Could the tree diversity pattern in Europe be generated by postglacial dispersal limitation? Ecol. Lett. 10: 453-460.
20. Tuomisto H. et al. 2003. Dispersal, environment and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299: 241-244.
21. Vanschoenwinkel B. et al. 2008. Any way the wind blows - frequent wind dispersal drives species sorting in ephemeral aquatic communities. Oikos 117: 125-134.