CO2 capture in natural gas combined cycle with SEWGS. Part A: Thermodynamic performances

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 12, Issue , 2013, Pages 493-501

  Gazzani, Matteo ^a   Macchi, Ennio ^a   Manzolini, Giampaolo ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

CAESAR; CCS efficiency; CCS penalty; SEWGS

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; NATURAL GAS; NATURAL GASOLINE PLANTS; SORBENTS; SORPTION; WATER GAS SHIFT;

CAESAR; CCS PENALTY; NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLES; NET ELECTRICAL EFFICIENCY; PRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION; SEWGS; SORPTION ENHANCED WATER GAS SHIFT; THERMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY USE; EUROPEAN UNION; NATURAL GAS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84872500663     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abbott, et al. Process for the production of hydrocarbons. US 7,087,652 B2 United States, August 8, 2006.
2. Abbott, et al. Production of hydrocarbons by steam reforming and Fisher-Tropsch reaction. US 7,323,497 B2 USA, January 29, 2008.
3. 2 Capture Project 2005, Elsevier, Oxford. D. Thomas, S. Benson (Eds.).
4. Cachet FP6 Project. /(online) (cited: January 8, 2010).
5. Caesar FP7 Project. (online) 2008 (cited: January 8, 2010). http://caesar.ecn.nl/.
6. 2 capture from combined cycles integrated with molten carbonate fuel cells. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4(3):441-451.
7. Carbon Capture Project. (online) (cited: January 7, 2010). http://www.co2captureproject.org/ccp2_capture.html.
8. Chiesa P., Macchi E. A thermodynamic analysis of different options to break 60% electric efficiency in combined cycle power plants. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 2004, 126:770-785. 10.1115/1.1771684.
9. Chiesa, P., Campanari, S., Manzolini, G., 2011. CO2 cryogenic separation from combined cycle integrated with molten carbonate fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, in press, doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.068.
10. Consonni, S., Lozza, G., Macchi, E., Chiesa, P., Bombarda, P., 1991. Gas turbine-based cycles for power generation. Part A: calculation model.
11. Dean, Sheldon W. Estimating metal dusting attack on stainless steel alloys in syngas environments. Corrosion 2001 2001, 01384.
12. DOE Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap and Program Plan 2007, US Department of Energy.
13. Franco, F., Bolland, O., Manzolini, E., Macchi, E., Booth, N., Rezvani, S., Pfeffer, A., 2009. Common Framework Definition document. http://caesar.ecn.nl/fileadmin/caesar/user/documents/D4.6-Common_Framework-final.pdf.
14. Franco F., et al. Common framework and test cases for transparent and comparable techno-economic evaluations of CO2 capture technologies - the work of the European Benchmark task force. Proceedings of GHGT-10 International Conference 2010.
15. Politecnico di Milano Software presentation: GS (Gas-Steam Cycles). (online) 2009 (cited: January 8, 2010). http://www.gecos.polimi.it/software/gs.html.
16. 2 Capture and Storage - A Key Carbon Abatement Option 2008, ISBN: 978-92-64-041400.
17. Johnson Mattey. (online). Johnson Mattey (cited: January 2, 2010). http://www.jmcatalysts.com/ptd/site.asp%3Fsiteid=694%26pageid=705.
18. Lozza G. Bottoming Steam Cycles for Combined Gas-Steam Power Plants: A Theoretical Estimation of Steam Turbine Performance and Cycle Analysis 1990, ASME Cogen-Turbo, New Orleans, USA.
19. Manzolini, G., Dijkstra, J.W., Macchi, E., Jansen, D., 2006. Technical economic evaluation of a system for electricity production with CO2 capture using membrane reformer with permeate side combustion.
20. Manzolini G., Macchi E., Binotti M., Gazzani M. Integration of SEWGS for carbon capture in natural gas combined cycle. Part A: thermodynamic performances. International Journal of Green-house Gas Control 2011, 5(2):200-213.
21. Manzolini G., Macchi E., Binotti M., Gazzani M. Integration of SEWGS for carbon capture in natural gas combined cycle. Part B: reference case comparison. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5(2):214-225.
22. 2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Enviornmental Technology 2002, 36:4467-4475.
23. 2 capture from natural gas power plants, with ATR and MDEA processes. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control (Elsevier) 2010, 4:785-797. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.04.015.
24. Valenti G., Bonalumi D., Macchi E A parametric investigation of the chilled ammonia process from energy and economic perspectives. Fuel 2011, 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.06.035.
25. Van Selow, E., Cobden, P., Van den Brink, R., Hufton, J., Wright, A., 2009a. Performance of sorption-enhanced water-gas shift as a pre-combustion CO2 capture technology. 1.
26. Van Selow E.R., et al. Carbon capture by sorption-enhanced-water-gas-shift reaction process using hydrotalcite-based material. Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research 2009, 48(9):4184-4193.
27. van Selow E.R., Cobden P.D., Wright A.D., van Der Brink R.W., Jansen D. Improved sorbent for the sorption-enhanced water-gas shift process. Energy Porcedia 2011, 4:1090-1095.
28. 2 capture with chemical absorption: a state-of-the-art review. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2011, 89:1609-1624.
29. 2 capture through. Energy procedia 2009, 1. 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.093.