How should debriefing be undertaken in web-based studies? Findings from a randomized controlled trial

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  McCambridge, Jim ^a   Kypri, Kypros ^b   Wilson, Amanda ^b  

^a Department of Social and Environmental Health Research   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Debriefing; Deception; Ethics; Methodology; Online; Randomised controlled trial; Web based

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; ETHICS; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ELECTRONIC MAIL; ETHICS; INTERNET; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84872481781     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2186     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Whitehead L. Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: an integrated review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 2007 Aug;65(4):782-791. [doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.005] [Medline: 17512105]. (Pubitemid 47077550)
2. Barchard K, Williams J. Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists. Behav Res Methods 2008 Nov;40(4):1111-1128. [doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1111] [Medline: 19001403].
3. Sharkey S, Jones R, Smithson J, Hewis E, Emmens T, Ford T, et al. Ethical practice in internet research involving vulnerable people: lessons from a self-harm discussion forum study (SharpTalk). J Med Ethics 2011 Dec;37(12):752-758. [doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100080] [Medline: 21947802].
4. Thompson L, Black E, Duff W, Paradise Black N, Saliba H, Dawson K. Protected health information on social networking sites: ethical and legal considerations. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(1):e8 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1590] [Medline: 21247862].
5. Varnhagen C, Gushta M, Daniels J, Peters T, Parmar N, Law D, et al. How informed is online informed consent? Ethics Behav 2005;15(1):37-48. [doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1501-3] [Medline: 16127857]. (Pubitemid 40855344)
6. Festinger D, Marlowe D, Croft J, Dugosh K, Arabia P, Benasutti K. Monetary incentives improve recall of research consent information: it pays to remember. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2009 Apr;17(2):99-104 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1037/a0015421] [Medline: 19331486].
7. British Psychological Society. Report of the Working Party on Conducting Reseach on the Internet: Guidelines for ethical practice in psychological research online. 2007. URL: http://www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/ conducting-research-on-the-internet-guidelines-for-ethical-practice-in- psychological-research-online.pdf [accessed 2012-11-14] [WebCite Cache ID 6CAuDJq6I].
8. Higgins J, Altman D. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
9. Fisher B, Fyrberg D. Participant Partners: College Students Weigh the Costs and Benefits of Deceptive Research. American Psychologist 1994;49(5):417-427. (Pubitemid 24976699)
10. Wendler D, Miller F. Deception in the pursuit of science. Arch Intern Med 2004 Mar 22;164(6):597-600. [doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.597] [Medline: 15037487]. (Pubitemid 38392973)
11. British Psychological Society. Chapter 42: Ethical principles for conducting research with human participants. In: Eckstein S, editor. Manual for research ethics committees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003:269-273.
12. Miller F, Gluck J, Wendler D. Debriefing and accountability in deceptive research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2008 Sep;18(3):235-251. [Medline: 18935922].
13. Kypri K, McCambridge J, Wilson A, Attia J, Sheeran P, Bowe S, et al. Effects of Study Design and Allocation on participant behaviour-ESDA: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2011;12(1):42 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-42] [Medline: 21320316].
14. Group A Webpage. URL: http://www.behaviourscience.net/esda-debrief/esda- debrief.html?pid=2402&aid=2859 [accessed 2012-11-14] [WebCite Cache ID 6CAur5MWt].
15. Group B Webpage. URL: http://www.behaviourscience.net/esda-debrief/esda- debrief.html?pid=9917&aid=9925 [accessed 2012-11-14] [WebCite Cache ID 6CAut5pE7].
16. Miller F, Wendler D. The relevance of empirical research in bioethics. Schizophr Bull 2006 Jan;32(1):37-41 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/schbul/ sbj004] [Medline: 16192410]. (Pubitemid 43063817)