메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? - a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups

Author keywords

Co ordinating editors; Cochrane review groups; COMET; Core outcome set; ORBIT; Survey; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLICY; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

EID: 84872452017     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-21     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (152)

References (6)
  • 4
    • 37749001159 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews
    • 10.1186/1745-6215-8-39, 2169261, 18039365
    • Clarke M. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials 2007, 8:39. 10.1186/1745-6215-8-39, 2169261, 18039365.
    • (2007) Trials , vol.8 , pp. 39
    • Clarke, M.1
  • 6
    • 77952470511 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Summary of findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information
    • 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014, 20434024
    • Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Summary of findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63:620-626. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014, 20434024.
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 620-626
    • Rosenbaum, S.E.1    Glenton, C.2    Oxman, A.D.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.