From enterprise to empowerment: the evolution of an Anglo-American approach to strategic urban economic regeneration

Strategic Change

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 219-229

  Lavin, Marilyn ^a   Whysall, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^b Nottingham Business School   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872451098     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10991697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsc.681     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Butler S. 1981. Enterprise Zones: Greenlining the Inner Cities. Heinemann Education: London.
2. Butler S. 1991. The conceptual evolution of enterprise zones. In Enterprise Zones, Green RE (ed), Sage: Newbury Park, CA; 27–40.
3. Carley M. 2000. Urban partnerships, governance and the regeneration of Britain's cities. International Planning Studies 5(3): 273–297.
4. Cowden R. 1995. Power to the zones. Planning 61: 8–12.
5. Dawson J, Sparks L. 1982. Retailing developments and enterprise zones. Retail & Distribution Management Jan/Feb: 43–46.
6. Department of the Environment/PA Cambridge Economic Consultants. 1987. An Evaluation of the Enterprise Zone Experiment. HMSO: London.
7. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2001. Interim Assessment of the Empowerment Zones (EZs) and Enterprise Communities (ECs) Program [http://www.huduser.org/publications/econdev/ezec_rpt.html, 8 November 2003].
8. Ellin A. 2000. A Harlem power zone weakens some. New York Times, 4 January.
9. Esar E, Bentley N (eds). 1951. The Treasury of Humorous Quotations. Phoenix House: London.
10. Fiore N. 1996. From the tax adviser: empowerment zone employment credit. Journal of Accountancy 181: 38–39.
11. Fleishmann B. 2001. Employment-zone empowerment and renewal — community tax incentives. The Tax Adviser 32: 649–650.
12. Fox J. 1996. The little policy idea that could. Fortune, 11 November.
13. Glaeser E. 1999. Help poor people, not poor places. Wall Street Journal, 12 August.
14. Hall P. 1991. British enterprise zones. In Enterprise Zones, Green RE (ed.). Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
15. Hughes D. 2000. Wake Up and Smell the Dollars! Whose Inner City Is This Anyway! Amber Books: Los Angeles.
16. Lawless P, Gore T. 1999. Urban regeneration and transport investment: a case study of Sheffield 1992–96. Urban Studies 36(3): 527–545.
17. Levine D. 1999. Gilding the ghetto. Across the Board 36: 9–10.
18. Massey D. 1984. Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production. Macmillan: London.
19. McCoy F. 1994. Can Clinton's urban policies really work? Black Enterprise 24: 178.
20. McFarlane A. 1999. Race, space and place: the geography of economic development. San Diego Law Review 36: 295–354.
21. Morrison H. 1987. The Regeneration of Local Economies. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
22. Potter J, Moore B. 2000. UK enterprise zones and the attraction of inward investment. Urban Studies 37(8): 1279–1312.
23. Riposa G. 1996. From enterprise zones to empowerment zones. American Behavioral Scientist 39: 536–551.
24. Roger Tym and Partners. 1983. Monitoring Enterprise Zones, Year Two Report. HMSO: London.
25. Schakel L. 2001. Tax law developments: Washington update. Municipal Finance Journal 22: 53–64.
26. Shay-Byrne O, McLaughlin M. 2000. Tax law developments: Washington update — paving the road to redevelopment: the past, present, and future of the EZ bond program. Municipal Finance Journal 21: 108–117.
27. Study Finds. 2002. EZ/EC program results mixed. The American City & County 117(Apr): 42.
28. Thomas CJ, Bromley RDF. 1987. The growth and functioning of an unplanned retail park: the Swansea Enterprise Zone. Regional Studies 21(4): 287–300.