A mixed-methodological examination of investment model variables among abused and nonabused college women

Journal of American College Health

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 36-43

  Dardis, Christina M ^a   Kelley, Erika L ^a   Edwards, Katie M ^b   Gidycz, Christine A ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

abuse; dating violence; Investment Model; qualitative

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BATTERED WOMAN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SATISFACTION; SEXUAL CRIME; SEXUALITY; STUDENT; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; VIOLENCE;

BATTERED WOMEN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SEX OFFENSES; SEXUAL PARTNERS; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VIOLENCE;

EID: 84872450428     PISSN: 07448481     EISSN: 19403208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2012.750609     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Edwards KM, Desai AD, Gidycz CA, Van WynsbergheA. Women's aggression in dating relationships: the role ofchildhood and adolescent victimization. J Psychol Women Q.2009;33:255-265.
2. Lewis SF, Fremouw W. Dating violence: a critical review ofthe literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:105-127.
3. Edwards KM, Gidycz CA, Murphy MJ. College women'sstay/leave decisions in abusive dating relationships: a prospectiveanalysis of an expanded investment model. J Interpers Violence.2011;26:1446-1462.
4. Katz J, Kuffel SW, Brown FA. Leaving a sexually coercivedating partner: a prospective application of the investment model.Psychol Women Q. 2006;30:267-275. (Pubitemid 44181375)
5. Rusbult CE. Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations:a test of the investment model. J Exp Soc Psychol.1980;16:172-186.
6. Rusbult CE. A longitudinal test of the investment model: thedevelopment and deterioration of satisfaction and commitment inheterosexual involvements. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;45:101-117.
7. Rusbult CE, Martz JM. Remaining in an abusive relationship:an investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence.Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;21:558-571.
8. Rusbult CE, Martz JM, Agnew CR. The Investment ModelScale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality ofalternatives, and investment size. Pers Relationsh. 1998;5:357-391. (Pubitemid 128655499)
9. Rhatigan DL, Street AE. The impact of intimate partnerviolence on decisions to leave dating relationships: a test of theinvestment model. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20:1580-1597. (Pubitemid 41756089)
10. Rhatigan DL, Street AE, Axsom DK. A critical review oftheories to explain violent relationship termination: implications forresearch and intervention. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26:321-345.
11. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB.The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): development and preliminarypsychometric data. J Family Issues. 1996;17:283-316.
12. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to ItsMethodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 2004.
13. Hsieh H, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative contentanalysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277-1288.
14. Manning K. Authenticity in constructivist inquiry: methodologicalconsiderations without prescription. Qual Inquiry.1997;3:93-115.
15. Shorey RC, Cornelius TL, Bell KM. A critical review oftheoretical frameworks for dating violence: comparing the datingand marital fields. Aggress Violent Behav. 2008;13:185-194.
16. Edwards KM, Murphy MJ, Tansill EC, et al. A qualitativeanalysis of college women's leaving processes in abusive relationships.J Am Coll Health. 2011;60:2-7.
17. Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola M. The efficacy of motivationalinterviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71:843-861. (Pubitemid 37151548)
18. Hughes MJ, Rasmussen LA. The utility of motivational interviewingin domestic violence shelters: a qualitative exploration.J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2010;19:300-322.