To use or not to use - Practitioners' perceptions of an open web portal for young patients with diabetes

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Nordfeldt, Sam ^a   Ängarne Lindberg, Teresia ^a   Berterö, Carina ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Blog; Childhood chronic disease; Discussion forum; Health information; Health knowledge; Health professionals; Internet; Participation; Practice; Type 1 diabetes; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERNET; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SWEDEN;

CHILD; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMANS; INTERNET; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SWEDEN;

EID: 84872447926     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1987     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brink S, Miller M, Moltz K. Education and multidisciplinary team care concepts for pediatric and adolescent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2002;15(8):1113-1130. [Medline: 12387509]. (Pubitemid 35153650)
2. Thorne S, Paterson B. Health care professional support for self-care management in chronic illness: insights from diabetes research. Patient Educ Couns 2001 Jan;42(1):81-90. [Medline: 11080608].
3. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002 Nov 20;288(19):2469-2475. [Medline: 12435261]. (Pubitemid 35340544)
4. Celler B, Lovell N, Basilakis J. Using information technology to improve the management of chronic disease. Med J Aust 2003 Sep 1;179(5):242-246. [Medline: 12924970]. (Pubitemid 37098398)
5. Houston T, Sands D, Jenckes M, Ford D. Experiences of patients who were early adopters of electronic communication with their physician: satisfaction, benefits, and concerns. Am J Manag Care 2004 Sep;10(9):601-608 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15515992]. (Pubitemid 39287369)
6. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware J, Yano E, Frank H. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med 1988;3(5):448-457. [Medline: 3049968].
7. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz M. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision-making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med 1989;4(1):23-30. [Medline: 2644407]. (Pubitemid 19049501)
8. Levinson W, Roter D, Mullooly J, Dull V, Frankel R. Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA 1997 Feb 19;277(7):553-559. [Medline: 9032162]. (Pubitemid 27083985)
9. Roter D, Hall J. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. Westport, Conn: Praeger; 2006.
10. Taub S. The Internet's role in patient/physician interaction: bringing our understanding in line with online reality. Compr Ophthalmol Update 2006;7(1):25-30. [Medline: 16630413].
11. Swift P. Diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2009 Sep;10 Suppl 12:51-57. [doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2009.00570.x] [Medline: 19754618].
12. Nordqvist C, Hanberger L, Timpka T, Nordfeldt S. Health professionals' attitudes towards using a Web 2.0 portal for child and adolescent diabetes care: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(2):e12 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1152] [Medline: 19403464].
13. Richards H, King G, Reid M, Selvaraj S, McNicol I, Brebner E, et al. Remote working: survey of attitudes to eHealth of doctors and nurses in rural general practices in the United Kingdom. Fam Pract 2005 Feb;22(1):2-7 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh716] [Medline: 15642724]. (Pubitemid 40309598)
14. Hegney D, Buikstra E, Eley R, Fallon T, Gilmore V, Soar J. Nurses and information technology: final report. Canberra: Australian Nursing Federation; 2007. URL: http://anf.org.au/documents/reports/IT-Project.pdf [accessed 2012-10-26] [WebCite Cache ID 6BhJc7VaR].
15. Timmons S. Nurses resisting information technology. Nurs Inq 2003 Dec;10(4):257-269. [Medline: 14622372]. (Pubitemid 37524172)
16. Moody L. E-health web portals: delivering holistic healthcare and making home the point of care. Holist Nurs Pract 2005;19(4):156-160. [Medline: 16006829].
17. Liederman E, Lee J, Baquero V, Seites P. Patient-physician web messaging. The impact on message volume and satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med 2005 Jan;20(1):52-57. [doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40009.x] [Medline: 15693928]. (Pubitemid 40271039)
18. Hart A, Henwood F, Wyatt S. The role of the Internet in patient-practitioner relationships: findings from a qualitative research study. J Med Internet Res 2004 Sep 30;6(3):e36 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e36] [Medline: 15471762].
19. Booth R. Educating the future eHealth professional nurse. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2006;3:Article 13. [doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1187] [Medline: 16646940].
20. Ward R, Stevens C, Brentnall P, Briddon J. The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature. Health Info Libr J 2008 Jun;25(2):81-97. [doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842. 2008.00777.x] [Medline: 18494643]. (Pubitemid 351725016)
21. Nordfeldt S, Hanberger L, Berterö C. Patient and parent views on a Web 2.0 Diabetes Portal: the management tool, the generator, and the gatekeeper: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(2):e17 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1267] [Medline: 20511179].
22. Mayring, P. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. Qualitative Content Analysis URL: http://www.qualitative- research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385 [accessed 2011-05-10] [WebCite Cache ID 5yZxyH2gR].
23. Hsieh H, Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-1288. [doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687] [Medline: 16204405]. (Pubitemid 41645161)
24. Baker L, Wagner T, Singer S, Bundorf M. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 2003 May 14;289(18):2400-2406. [doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400] [Medline: 12746364]. (Pubitemid 37430173)
25. Björkander J, Berterö C. Does advoy.com help patients with primary immunodeficience diseases; experience that their life situation has improved? RECIIS 2010;4(2):3-8. [doi: 10.3395/reciis.v4i2.251en].
26. Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykänen P, Prokosch H, Rigby M, Talmon J, HIS-EVAL Workshop Participants. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform 2004 Jun 30;73(6):479-491. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.04.004] [Medline: 15171977]. (Pubitemid 38692647)
27. Suarez-Almazor M. Patient-physician communication. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2004 Mar;16(2):91-95. [Medline: 14770091]. (Pubitemid 38280941)
28. Travaline J, Ruchinskas R, D'Alonzo G. Patient-physician communication: why and how. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2005 Jan;105(1):13-18 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 15710660]. (Pubitemid 40543165)
29. Fox S, Raine L. Vital Decisions. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2002. How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2002/Vital- Decisions-A-Pew-Internet-Health-Report/Summary-of-Findings.aspx [accessed 2012-10-26] [WebCite Cache ID 631D4yMpH].
30. Fruhling A, Lee S. The influence of user interface usability on rural consumers' trust of e-health services. Int J Electron Healthc 2006;2(4):305-321. [Medline: 18048252]. (Pubitemid 44320159)
31. McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns 2006 Oct;63(1-2):24-28. [doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006] [Medline: 16406474]. (Pubitemid 44331549)
32. Weston W, Brown J, Stewart M. Patient-centred interviewing part I: understanding patients' experiences. Can Fam Physician 1989 Jan;35:147-151. [Medline: 21253278].
33. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008.