Equifinality in Project Management Exploring Causal Complexity in Projects

Systems Research and Behavioral Science

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 2-14

  Kapsali, Maria ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Equifinality; Project management; Research design; Systems thinking

Indexed keywords

EQUIFINALITY; INNOVATION PROJECTS; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; NATIONAL PROGRAMME; PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHOD; RESEARCH DESIGNS; SYSTEMS THINKING;

HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH; SYSTEM THEORY;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84872434471     PISSN: 10927026     EISSN: 10991743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sres.2128     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ackermann F, Eden C, Williams T. 1997. Modelling for litigation: mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches. Interfaces 27: 48-65.
2. Alderman N, Andersen ES, Winch GM. 2007. Papers presented at EURAM 2006. International Journal of Project Management 25: 325-327.
3. Amado G, Ambrose A (Eds.). 2001. The Transitional Approach to Change. Karnac Books: London.
4. Ashby WR. 1958. Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1: 83-99.
5. Atkinson R. 1999. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it is time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management 17: 337-342.
6. Bertalanffy L. 1968. General Systems Theory. Braziller: NY.
7. Bredillet C. 2007. Exploring research in project management-nine schools of project management research (part 1), Project Management Journal 38(2): 3-4.
8. Cano JL, Rebollar R, Saenz MJ. 1998. Application of usability techniques to the development of a project simulation game. Proceedings of the IV International Congress of Project Engineering; 203-213.
9. Cano JL, Saenz MJ. 2003. Project management simulation laboratory: experimental learning and knowledge acquisition. Production Planning and Control 14(2): 166-173.
10. Capra F. 1996. The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems, 1stedn. Anchor Books: New York.
11. Checkland P. 2000. Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17: S11-S58.
12. Checkland PB. 1999. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley and Sons Ltd.: Chichester.
13. Chow T, Cao DB. 2008. A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of Systems and Software 81(6): 961-971.
14. Cicmil S. 1997. Critical factors of project management. The TQM Magazine 96: 390-396.
15. Cicmil S. 2006. Understanding project management practice through interpretative and critical research perspectives. Project Management Journal 37(2): 27-37.
16. Crawford L, Pollack J, England D. 2006. Uncovering the trends in project management: journal emphases over the last 10 years. International Journal of Project Management 24: 175-185.
17. Crawford L, Pollack A. 2004. Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis. International Journal of Project Management 22: 645-653.
18. Davies A, Gann D, Douglas T. 2009. Innovation in megaprojects: systems integration at London Heathrow terminal 5. California Management Review 51(2): 101-122.
19. DeWeaver FM, Gillespie LC. 1997. Real World Project Management: New Approaches for Adapting to Change and Uncertainty. Library of Congress: USA.
20. Dunkan WR. 1996. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMI: UK.
21. Elloy DF, McCombs T. 1996. Application of open systems theory in a manufacturing plant. Team Performance Management 2(3): 15-22.
22. Emery FE, Trist EL. 1965. Causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18: 21-32.
23. Engwall M. 2003. No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. Research Policy 32(5): 789-808.
24. Fitzerald B. 1996. 10 Formalized systems development methodologies: a critical perspective. Information Systems Journal 6(1): 3-23.
25. Fitzgerald G, Siddiqui FA. 2002. Business process reengineering and flexibility: a case for unification. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 14: 73-86.
26. Gemünden HG, Salomo S, Krieger A. 2005. The influence of project autonomy on project success. International Journal of Project Management 23: 366-373.
27. Geraldi J, Turber JR, Maylor H, Söderholm A, Hobday M, Brady T. 2008. Innovation in project management: voices of researchers. International Journal of Project Management 26: 586-589.
28. Gresov C, Drazin R. 1997. Equifinality: functional equivalence in organization design. The Academy of Management Review 22: 403-428.
29. Heeks R, Mundy D. 2001. Information systems and public sector reform in the third world. In The Internationalization of Public Management, McCourt W, Minogue M (eds). Edward Elgar: UK; 196-219.
30. Hirzalla M, Cleland-Huang J, Arsanjani A. 2009. A metrics suite for evaluating flexibility and complexity in service oriented architectures. ICSOC 2008. LNCS 5472: 41-52.
31. Hodgson D. 2000. A critical analysis of the disciplinary effects of project management. Working Paper no 2003, UMIST.
32. Jackson MC. 1991. Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences. Springer: USA.
33. Jennings DF, Rajaratnam D, Lawrence FB. 2003. Strategy-performance relationships in service firms: a test for equifinality. Journal of Managerial Issues 15(2): 208-220.
34. Kapsali M. 2008. European Policy and Operational Change. Manchester Business School: UK.
35. Kapsali M. 2010a. Comparing the application of open and closed systems approaches in innovation project management, 32(1): 31-46.
36. Kapsali M. 2010b. Relating in project networks in innovation systems. DRUID: opening up innovation: strategy, organization and innovation. Available at: http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/wiewabstract.php?id=501897&cf=43.
37. Kapsali M. 2011a. Systems thinking in innovation project management: a match that works. International Journal of Project Management 29: 396-407.
38. Kapsali M. 2011b. How to implement innovation policies through projects successfully. Technovation 31: 615-626.
39. Kapsali M. 2011c. Improving patient safety: how to use service modularity in healthcare processes to manage systemic errors. POMS conference, Reno, Nevada, USA, 29 April-2 May.
40. Keil M, Cule P, Lyytinen K, Schmidt R. 1998. A framework for identifying software project risks. Communications of the ACM 41(11): 76-83.
41. Khan J 2005. The importance of local context in the planning of environmental projects: examples from two biogas cases. Local Environment 10(2): 125.
42. Koskela L, Howell G. 2002. The Underlying Theory of Project Management is Obsolete. Project management Institute: USA.
43. Kwak YH, Anbari FT. 2009. Analyzing project management research: perspectives from top management journals. International Journal of Project Management 27: 435-446.
44. Lamers M. 2000. Do you manage a project, or what? A reply to 'Do you manage work, deliverables or resources'. International Journal of Project Management 20: 325-329.
45. Lau RSM. 1999. Critical factors for achieving manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 19(3): 328-341.
46. Lenfle S. 2008. Exploration and project management. International Journal of Project Management 26: 469-478.
47. Lenfle S, Loch C. 2010. Lost roots: How project management came to emphasize control over flexibility and novelty. California Management Review 53(1): 32-55.
48. Lundin RA, Söderholm A. 1995. A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management 11: 437-455.
49. Lundin RA, Steinthorsson RS. 2003. Studying organizations as temporary. Scandinavian Journal of Management 19: 233-250.
50. Mantel S, Meredith J. 2000. Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley: US.
51. Melnyk SA, Hanson SA, Calantone RJ. 2010. Hitting the target... but missing the point: resolving the paradox of strategic transition. Long Range Planning 43: 555-574.
52. Morris PWG. 2002. Science, objective knowledge and the theory of project management. Proceedings of ICE, Civil Engineering 150 Paper 12641: 82-90.
53. Mulej M. 2007. Systems theory: a worldview and/or a methodology aimed at requisite holism/realism of humans' thinking decisions and action. Systems Research and Behavioural Science 24: 347-357.
54. Muller R. 2003. Determinants for external communications of IT project managers. International Journal of Project Management 21: 345-354.
55. Muller R, Turner JR. 2005. The impact of principal-agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager. International Journal of Project Management 23: 398-403.
56. Phelan SE. 1999. A note on the correspondence between complexity and systems theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research 12(3): 237-238.
57. Plsek P. 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century Redesigning Health Care with Insights from the Science of Complex Adaptive Systems. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. National Academies Press: Washington DC, USA; 309-322.
58. Pondy LR, Mitroff I. 1979. Beyond open systems models of organization. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1, Cummings L, Staw BM. (eds.). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT.
59. Ragin CC. 1999. Using qualitative comparative analysis to study causal complexity, HSK Health Services Research, 34(5): 1225-1239.
60. Saad M, Cicmil S, Greenwood M. 2002. Technology transfer projects in developing countries-furthering the project management perspectives. International Journal of Project Management 20: 617-662.
61. Sauer C, Reich BH. 2007. What do we want from a theory of project management? A response to Rodney Turner. International Journal of Project Management 25(1): 1-2.
62. Schmidt R. 2006. Flexibility in service processes. Proceedings of the Business Process Modelling, Development and Support Conference BPMDS '06, Luxemburg, June 5-9.
63. Shenhar A, Dvir D. 2007. Reinventing Project Management. The Diamon to Successful Growth and Innovation. Harvard Business School Press: USA.
64. Smeds R. 1998. Enterprise simulation laboratory for education, research and development. In Experimental Learning in Production Management, Smeds R, Riis JO. (eds.). Chapman and Hall: UK; 11-16.
65. Smyth HJ, Morris PWG. 2007. An epistemological evaluation of research into projects and their management: methodological issues. International Journal of Project Management 25(4): 423-436.
66. Söderlund J. 2004. Building theories of project management, past research, questions for the future. International Journal of Project Management 22: 183-191.
67. Staber U. 2004. Networking beyond organisational boundaries: the case of project organisations. Creativity and Innovation Management 13(1): 30-40.
68. Standish Group. 2009. CHAOS Report 2009-Surprising New Results Announced. The Standish Group International Inc.: Boston, MA.
69. Starr MK. 2010. Modular production-a 45 year old concept. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 30(1): 7-19.
70. Sydow RG, Staber U. 2002. The institutional embeddedness of project networks: the case of content production in German television. Regional Studies 36(3): 215-227.
71. Tan JH, Wen J, Beveen A. 2005. Healthcare and services delivery systems as complex adaptive systems. Communication of the ACM 48(5): 36-44.
72. Turner JR, Keegan A. 2001. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization. European Management Journal 19: 254-267.
73. Ulrich W. 1988. System thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: a program of research. Systems Practice 1(2): 137-163.
74. Verdu-Jover AJ, Llorens-Montes FJ, Garcia-Morales VJ. 2004. The concept of fit in services flexibility research an empirical approach. International Journal of Service Industry Management 15(5): 499-514.
75. Winter M, Smith C. 2006. EPSRC 2004-6. Rethinking project management. Final Report, May. Available at: http:/www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/project/research/management/rethinkpm/pdf/final_report.pdf.
76. Zajonc RB, Murphy ST, Inglehart M, 1989. Feeling and facial efference: implications of the vascular theory of emotion. Psychological Review 96(3): 16.