A knowledge based approach for automated signal generation in pharmacovigilance

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 626-630

  Henegar, Corneliu ^a   Bousquet, Cédric ^a,b   Agnes A ^b   Degoulet, Patrice ^a   Jaulent, Marie Christine ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

Author keywords

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Automatic Data Processing; Knowledge representation (Computer); ; Terminology

Indexed keywords

DATA DESCRIPTION; DATA HANDLING; DATA MINING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PHARMACODYNAMICS; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL GENERATORS; TERMINOLOGY; SIGNAL DETECTION;

ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; DRUG ADVERSE EVENTS; KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACH; PHARMACOVIGILANCE; REPORTING SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC INFORMATION; SIGNAL DETECTION TOOLS; ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION (COMPUTER); KNOWLEDGE-REPRESENTATION; PERFORMANCE; SIGNAL GENERATION;

SIGNAL DETECTION; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 84872403130     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-626     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Van Puijenbroek EP, Bate A, Leufkens HG, Lindquist M, Orre R, Egberts AC. A comparison of measures of dispro-portionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2002; 11(1):3-10
2. Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, Orre R. A data mining approach for signal detection and analysis. Drug Saf 2002; 25(6):393-7.
3. Bate A, Lindquist M, Orre R, Edwards IR, Meyboom RH. Data-mining analyses of pharmacovigilance signals in relation to relevant comparison drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 58(7):483-90.
4. Szarfman A, Machado SG, O'Neill RT. Use of screening algorithms and computer systems to efficiently signal higher-than-expected combinations of drugs and events in the US FDA's spontaneous reports database. Drug Saf 2002; 25(6):381-92.
5. Hauben M, Zhou X. Quantitative methods in pharmacovigilance: focus on signal detection. Drug Saf 2003;26(3): 159-86
6. Lindquist M, Stahl M, Bate A, Edwards IR, Meyboom RH. A retrospective evaluation of a data mining approach to aid finding new adverse drug reaction signals in the WHO international database. Drug Saf 2000; 23(6): 533-42.
7. Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S. The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf 1999; 20(2):109-17.
8. Brown EG. Effects of coding dictionary on signal generation: a consideration of use of MedDRA compared with WHO-ART. Drug Saf 2002; 25(6):445-52.
9. Yokotsuka M, Aoyama M, Kubota K. The use of a medical dictionary for regulatory activities terminology (MedDRA) in prescription-event monitoring in Japan (J-PEM). Int J Med Inf 2000; 57(2-3): 139-53
10. Brown EG. Methods and pitfalls in searching drug safety databases utilizing the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf 2003; 26(3): 145-58.
11. Lussier YA, Rothwell DJ, Cote RA. The SNOMED model: a knowledge source for the controlled terminology of the computerized patient record. Meth Inform Med 1998; 37:161-4.
12. Bechhofer S, Horrocks I, Goble C, Stevens R. OilEd: a Reason-able Ontology Editor for the Semantic Web. Proceedings of KI2001, Joint German/Austrian conference on Artificial Intelligence. LNAI: Springer-Verlag.
13. Horrocks I, Padgham L, Thompson L. Feasibility of Optimized Disjunctive Reasoning for Approximate Matching. Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
14. Haarslev V, Moller R. Description of the RACER System and its Applications. Proceedings International Workshop on Description Logics (DL-2001).
15. Begaud B, Evreux JC, Jouglard J, Lagier G. Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France. Therapie 1985; 40(2): 111-8.
16. Rector AL, Zanstra PE, Solomon WD et ah Reconciling users' needs and formal requirements: issues in developing a reusable ontology for medicine. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 1998; 2(4):229-42.
17. Hanley JA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1989; 29(3):307-35.