A mass-balanced pelagic ecosystem model with size-structured behaviourally adaptive zooplankton and fish

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 251, Issue , 2013, Pages 54-63

  Castellani, Marco ^a   Rosland, Rune ^a   Urtizberea, Agurtzane ^a   Fiksen, Øyvind ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b Uni Research   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Community structure; End to end ecosystem model; Fish; Optimal foraging; Trait based model

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE REPRESENTATIONS; AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; CLOSURE TERM; COMMUNITY STRUCTURES; DIFFERENT SIZES; ECOSYSTEM MODEL; ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE; FISH ABUNDANCE; FISH PREDATION; INTRA-GUILD PREDATION; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MARINE FOOD WEB; MESOZOOPLANKTON; MORTALITY RATE; OPTIMAL FORAGING; PELAGIC ECOSYSTEM; SIZE STRUCTURE; STRUCTURING EFFECTS; TOTAL BIOMASS; TROPHIC LEVEL; TWO-STATE;

BIODIVERSITY; FISH; PHYTOPLANKTON; PROFITABILITY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ADAPTATION; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE; FISH; FOOD WEB; GROWTH RATE; LIGHT EFFECT; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MORTALITY; OPTIMUM FORAGING THEORY; PELAGIC ECOSYSTEM; PREDATION; SIZE STRUCTURE; TROPHIC LEVEL; ZOOPLANKTON;

EID: 84872388903     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aksnes D.L. Evidence for visual constraints in large marine fish stocks. Limnology and Oceanography 2007, 52:198-203.
2. Aksnes D.L., Nejstgaard J., Sædberg E., Sørnes T. Optical control of fish and zooplankton populations. Limnology and Oceanography 2004, 49:233-238.
3. Anderson T.R., Gentleman W.C., Sinha B. Influence of grazing formulations on the emergent properties of a complex ecosystem model in a global ocean general circulation model. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 87:201-213.
4. Baird M.E., Suthers I.M. A size-resolved pelagic ecosystem model. Ecological Modelling 2007, 203:185-203.
5. Barton A.D., Dutkiewicz S., Flierl G., Bragg J., Follows M.J. Patterns of diversity in marine phytoplankton. Science 2010, 327:1509-1511.
6. Brooks J.L., Dodson S.I. Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science 1965, 150:28-35.
7. Carlotti F., Poggiale J.C. Towards methodological approaches to implement the zooplankton component in end to end food-web models. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 84:20-38.
8. Casini M., Lövgren J., Hjelm J., Cardinale M., Molinero J.-C., Kornilovs G. Multi-level trophic cascades in a heavily exploited open marine ecosystem. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2008, 275:1793-2180.
9. Clark J.R., Daines S.J., Lenton T.M., Watson A.J., Williams H.T.P. Individual-based modelling of adaptation in marine microbial populations using genetically defined physiological parameters. Ecological Modelling 2011, 222:3823-3837.
10. deYoung B., Heath M., Werner F., Chai F., Megrey B., Monfray P. Challenges of modeling ocean basin ecosystems. Science 2004, 304:1463-1466.
11. deYoung B., Werner F.E., Batchelder H.P., Carlotti F., Fiksen Ø., Hofmann E.E., Kim S., Kishi M.J., Yamazaki H. Dynamics of marine ecosystems: integration through models of physical-biological interactions. Marine Ecosystems and Global Change 2010, 89-128. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M. Barange, J.G. Field, R.P. Harris, E.E. Hofmann, R.I. Perry, F.E. Werner (Eds.).
12. Dupont N., Klevjer T.A., Kaartvedt S., Aksnes D.L. Diel vertical migration of the deep-water jellyfish Periphylla periphylla simulated as individual responses to absolute light intensity. Limnology and Oceanography 2009, 54:1765-1775.
13. Eiane K., Aksnes D.L., Bagoien E., Kaartvedt S. Fish or jellies - a question of visibility?. Limnology and Oceanography 1999, 44:1352-1357.
14. Fiksen Ø., Eliassen S., Titelman J. Multiple predators in the pelagic: modelling behavioural cascades. Journal of Animal Ecology 2005, 74:423-429.
15. Follows M.J., Dutkiewicz S. Modeling diverse communities of marine microbes. Annual Review of Marine Science 2011, 3:427-451.
16. Follows M.J., Dutkiewicz S., Grant S., Chisholm S.W. Emergent biogeography of microbial communities in a model ocean. Science 2007, 315:1843-1846.
17. Frank K.T., Petrie B., Fisher J.A.D., Leggett W.C. Transient dynamics of an altered large marine ecosystem. Nature 2011, 477. 86-U98.
18. Fuchs H.L., Franks P.J.S. Plankton community properties determined by nutrients and size-selective feeding. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2010, 413:1-15.
19. Fulton E.A. Approaches to end-to-end ecosystem models. Journal of Marine Systems 2010, 81:171-183.
20. Gentleman W., Leising A., Frost B., Strom S., Murray J. Functional responses for zooplankton feeding on multiple resources: a review of assumptions and biological dynamics. Deep Sea Research Part II 2003, 50:2847-2875.
21. Gentleman W.C., Neuheimer A.B. Functional responses and ecosystem dynamics: how clearance rates explain the influence of satiation, food-limitation and acclimation. Journal of Plankton Research 2008, 30:1215-1231.
22. Hansen P.J., Bjornsen P.K., Hansen B.W. Zooplankton grazing and growth: scaling within the 2-2,000-mu m body size range. Limnology and Oceanography 1997, 42:687-704.
23. Hansson L.A., Annadotter H., Bergman E., Hamrin S.F., Jeppesen E., Kairesalo T., Luokkanen E., Nilsson P.A., Sondergaard M., Strand J. Biomanipulation as an application of food-chain theory: constraints, synthesis, and recommendations for temperate lakes. Ecosystems 1998, 1:558-574.
24. Heckmann L., Drossel B., Brose U., Guill C. Interactive effects of body-size structure and adaptive foraging on food-web stability. Ecology Letters 2012, 15:243-250.
25. Hernandez-Leon S., Gomez M., Pagazaurtundua M., Portillo-Hahnefeld A., Montero I., Almeida C. Vertical distribution of zooplankton in Canary Island waters: implications for export flux. Deep Sea Research Part I 2001, 48:1071-1092.
26. Huse G., Fiksen Ø. Modelling encounter rates and distribution of mobile predators and prey. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 84:93-104.
27. Kiørboe T. How zooplankton feed: mechanisms, traits and trade-offs. Biological Reviews 2011, 86:311-339.
28. Mariani P., Visser A.W. Optimization and emergence in marine ecosystem models. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 84:89-92.
29. Megrey B.A., Rose K.A., Klumb R.A., Hay D.E., Werner F.E., Eslinger D.L., Smith S.L. A bioenergetics-based population dynamics model of Pacific herring (Clupea harengus pallasi) coupled to a lower trophic level nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton model: Description, calibration, and sensitivity analysis. Ecological Modelling 2007, 202:144-164.
30. Merico A., Bruggeman J., Wirtz K. A trait-based approach for downscaling complexity in plankton ecosystem models. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220:3001-3010.
31. Ohman M.D. The demographic benefits of diel vertical migration by zooplankton. Ecological Monographs 1990, 60:257-281.
32. Pace M.L., Cole J.J., Carpenter S.R., Kitchell J.F. Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1999, 14:483-488.
33. Pearre S. Eat and run? The hunger/satiation hypothesis in vertical migration: history, evidence and consequences. Biological Reviews 2003, 78:1-79.
34. Prowe A.E.F., Pahlow M., Dutkiewicz S., Follows M., Oschlies A. Top-down control of marine phytoplankton diversity in a global ecosystem model. Progress in Oceanography 2012, 101:1-13.
35. Prowe A.E.F., Pahlow M., Oschlies A. Controls on the diversity-productivity relationship in a marine ecosystem model. Ecological Modelling 2012, 225:167-176.
36. Romare P., Hansson L.A. A behavioral cascade: top-predator induced behavioral shifts in planktivorous fish and zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 2003, 48:1956-1964.
37. Rose K.A., Allen J.I., Artioli Y., Barange M., Blackford J., Carlotti F., Cropp R., Daewel U., Edwards K., Flynn K., Hill S.L., HilleRisLambers R., Huse G., Mackinson S., Megrey B., Moll A., Rivkin R., Salihoglu B., Schrum C., Shannon L., Shin Y.J., Smith S.L., Smith C., Solidoro C., St John M., Zhou M. End-to-end models for the analysis of marine ecosystems: challenges, issues, and next steps. Marine and Coastal Fisheries 2010, 2:115-130.
38. Schmitz O.J. Resolving Ecosystem Complexity 2010, Monographs in Population Biology 47,Princeton University Press, 176 pp.
39. Schmitz O.J., Grabowski J.H., Peckarsky B.L., Preisser E.L., Trussell G.C., Vonesh J.R. From individuals to ecosystem function: toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 2008, 89:2436-2445.
40. Schrum C., Alekseeva I., St John M. Development of a coupled physical-biological ecosystem model ECOSMO - Part I: model description and validation for the North Sea. Journal of Marine Systems 2006, 61:79-99.
41. Schrum C., St John M., Alekseeva I. ECOSMO, a coupled ecosystem model of the North Sea and Baltic Sea: Part II. Spatial-seasonal characteristics in the North Sea as revealed by EOF analysis. Journal of Marine Systems 2006, 61:100-113.
42. Shin Y.-J., Travers M., Maury O. Coupling low and high trophic levels models: towards a pathways-orientated approach for end-to-end models. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 84:105-112.
43. Shin Y.J., Cury P. Using an individual-based model of fish assemblages to study the response of size spectra to changes in fishing. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2004, 61:414-431.
44. Smith S.L., Pahlow M., Merico A., Wirtz K.W. Optimality-based modeling of planktonic organisms. Limnology and Oceanography 2011, 56:2080-2094.
45. St.John M.A., Ruiz J., Monfray P., Grigorov I., Hannah C.G. Introduction to the Cadiz Symposium on marine ecosystem model parameterisation: examining the state of our art. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 84:1-5.
46. Stock C.A., Powell T.M., Levin S.A. Bottom-up and top-down forcing in a simple size-structured plankton dynamics model. Journal of Marine Systems 2008, 74:134-152.
47. Thingstad T.F., Strand E., Larsen A. Stepwise building of plankton functional type (PFT) models: a feasible route to complex models?. Progress in Oceanography 2010, 84:6-15.
48. Utne K.R., Hjøllo S.S., Huse G., Skogen M. Estimating the consumption of Calanus finmarchicus by planktivorous fish in the Norwegian Sea using a fully coupled 3D model system. Marine Biology Research 2012, 8:527-547.
49. Vanni M.J., Layne C.D. Nutrient recycling and herbivory as mechanisms in the " top-down" effect of fish on algae in lakes. Ecology 1997, 78:21-40.
50. Verity P.G., Smetacek V. Organism life cycles, predation, and the structure of marine pelagic ecosystems. Marine Ecology Progress Series 1996, 130:277-293.
51. Verity P.G., Smetacek V., Smayda T.J. Status, trends and the future of the marine pelagic ecosystem. Environmental Conservation 2002, 29:207-237.
52. Visser, A.W., Fiksen, Ø. Optimal foraging in marine ecosystem models: selectivity, profitability and switching. Marine Ecology Progress Series, doi: 10.3354/meps10079, in press.
53. Ward B.A., Dutkiewicz S., Jahn O., Follows M.J. A size-structured food-web model for the global ocean. Limnology and Oceanography 2012, 57:1877-1891.
54. Werner F.E., Ito S.I., Megrey B.A., Kishi M.J. Synthesis of the NEMURO model studies and future directions of marine ecosystem modeling. Ecological Modelling 2007, 202:211-223.
55. Woods J.D. The Lagrangian ensemble metamodel for simulating plankton ecosystems. Progress in Oceanography 2005, 67:84-159.