Requirements of 3D cadastres for height systems

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 11-20

  Navratil, Gerhard ^a   Unger, Eva Maria ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cadastre; Height definition; Height system; Quality requirements

Indexed keywords

CADASTRE; GEOMETRICAL QUALITY; HEIGHT DEFINITION; HEIGHT SYSTEM; HUMAN INTERVENTION; IF THERE ARE; MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT; POTENTIAL CHANGE; QUALITY REQUIREMENTS; REFERENCE SYSTEMS;

ECOLOGY;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

CADASTRE; GEODESY; HEIGHT; HEIGHT DETERMINATION; STANDARD (REFERENCE);

EID: 84872383103     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agnew D.C. Earth tides. Treatise on geophysics 2007, 163-195. Elsevier, Oxford. G. Schubert, T. Herring (Eds.).
2. Amos M. New Zealand vertical datum 2009. New Zealand surveyor 2009, 300:5-16.
3. Austrian Federal Chancellery (2011). Administration on the net. The ABC guide of eGovernment in Austria. http://www.digitales.oesterreich.gv.at/publications.
4. Bretterbauer K., Weber R. A primer of geodesy. Geowissenschaftliche mitteilungen 2003, Vol. 64. Springer, Vienna, Austria, P. 50.
5. Briese C., Höggerl N., Imrek E., Otter J., Ruess D. Transformation von GNSS-Höhen in österreichische Gebrauchshöhen mittels einer Transformationsfläche (Höhen-Grid). österr. Zeitschr. F. Vermessung u. Geoinformation 2012, 99:267-281.
6. Buyong T., Frank A.U., Kuhn W. A conceptual model of measurements-based multipurpose cadastral systems. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) 1991, 3:35-49.
7. Frank A.U., Navratil G. Ignoring correlation leads to bone shaped confidence regions and other couter-intuitive aspects of spatial data quality. 7th International symposium on spatial data quality 2011, 95-100. INESC Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. C.C. Fonte, L. Goncalves, G. Goncalves (Eds.).
8. Grgić I., Lučić M., Repanić M., Bjelotomić O., Liker M., Markovinović D., et al. Preliminary works on creation of the new croatian geoid model HRG2009. EUREF Symposium 2009, International Association of Geodesy, Firenca, Italy.
9. Hackl, M. (2007). Dreidimensionaler Kataster - Möglichkeit, Notwendigkeit und Fortschritt der Einführung in verschiedenen Ländern (engl. 3D Cadastre - Possibility, Necessity, and Progress of Implementation in Different Countries). Unpublished Diploma Thesis, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna.
10. Hofmann-Wellenhof B., Moritz H. Practical geodesy 2005, Springer, Vienna.
11. Höggerl, N. (2012). Das Europäische Vertikale Referenzsystem (EVRS) und dessen Bezug zu den Höhen des MGI-Systems in österreich (engl. The European Vertical Datum (EVRS) and ist relation to the heights of the system MGI in Austria). Presentation at the " Impulsveranstaltung: Neue Referenzsysteme" Accessed 19.10.12. http://www.bev.gv.at/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/BEV_PORTAL_CONTENT_ALLGEMEIN/0100_NEWS/NEWS-PDF/HOEGGERL_KOORDINATENSYSTEME2012-10-10_EVRS07.PDF.
12. Ihde J., Sánchez L. A unified global height reference system as a basis for IGGOS. Journal of Geodynamics 2005, 40:400-413.
13. Imrek, E. (2012). Das europäische Referenzsystem ETRS89 und dessen Bezug zum österreichischen System der Landesvermessung MGI (engl. The European Reference System ETRS89 and its relation to the Austrian system of land administration MGI). Presentation at the " Impulsveranstaltung: Neue Referenzsysteme" Accessed 19.10.12. http://www.bev.gv.at/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/BEV_PORTAL_CONTENT_ALLGEMEIN/0100_NEWS/NEWS-PDF/IMREK_KOORDINATENSYSTEME2012-10-10_ETRS89.PDF.
14. ISO (2005). Geographic information - Spatial schema. EN ISO 19107:2005 (p. 174).
15. Jacob T., Wahr J., Gross R., Swenson S., Geruao A. Estimating geoid height change in North America: Past, present and future. Journal of Geodesy 2012, 86:337-358.
16. Kaufmann J., Steudler D. Cadastre 2014 1998, FIG.
17. Kraus K., Pfeifer N. Advanced DTM generation from LIDAR data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2001, XXXIV:23-30.
18. Lan P.H. Building a unified height system with various initial points for the ASEAN countries. 7th FIG regional conference. Spatial data serving people 2009, FIG, Hanoi, Vietnam, p. 9.
19. Land Registration Act 2002 (2002). An act to make provision about land registration; and for connected purposes. 26.02.2. http://www.legislation.gov.uk.
20. Lidberg M., Johansson J.M., Scherneck H.-G., Davis J.L. An improved and extended GPS-derived 3D velocity field of the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) in Fennoscandia. Journal of Geodesy 2007, 81:213-230.
21. Meier E., Geiger A., Ingensand H., Licht H., Limpach P., Steiger A., et al. Hydrostatic leveling systems: Measuring at the system limits. FIG congress 2011, Springer, Sydney, Australia, (p. 15).
22. Navratil G. Legal and technical aspects of decisions on property boundaries - The case of Austria. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 2008, 5:7-23.
23. Neunzert G.M. Subdividing the land - Metes and bounds and rectangular survey systems 2011, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
24. Stoter J., van Oosterom P. 3D Cadastre in an international context 2006, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.
25. Twaroch C. Richter kennen keine Toleranz (engl. Judges do not use Imprecision). Int Geodätische Woche 2005, 154-159. Wichmann, Obergurgl. G. Chesi, T. Weinold (Eds.).
26. van Oosterom P.J.M., Stoter J.E., Lemmen J.E. Modelling of 3D cadastral systems. 28th Cadastral seminar 2005, 594-606. Korea Cadastral Survey Corp., Busan. K. Kyu-Tae (Ed.).
27. VwGH (1983). Erkenntnis des Verwaltungsgerichtshofes (engl. Finding of the Austrian Highest Administrative Court). 83/06/0088.
28. Waalenwijn I.A. Hydrostatic levelling in the Netherlands. Survey Review 1964, 17(212-221):267-276.
29. Wolf A. Tidal force observation. Geophysics 1940, 5:317-320.
30. Wolf P.R., Brinker R.C. Elementary Surveying 1989, Harper & Row, New York. 8th ed.