A compressible lagrangian framework for modeling the fluid-structure interaction in the underwater implosion of an aluminum cylinder

Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 339-367

  Kamran, Kazem ^a   Rossi, Riccardo ^a   Oñate, Eugenio ^a   Idelsohn, Sergio Rodolfo ^a,b  

^a INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING CIMNE   (Spain)

^b INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Fluid structure; Implosion; Lagrangian shock hydrodynamics; Monolithic; Nonlinear; PFEM

Indexed keywords

FLUID-STRUCTURES; IMPLOSION; LAGRANGIAN; MONOLITHIC; NONLINEAR; PFEM;

ALUMINUM; ALUMINUM CONTAINERS; EXPLOSIONS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS;

CYLINDERS (SHAPES);

EID: 84872380791     PISSN: 02182025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S021820251340006X     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. J. F. M. Manual, Quality Maintenance, Submarine Maintenance Engineering (US Navy, 2006), Vol. 5, Part III
2. L. Rayleigh, On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity, Phil. Mag. 34 (1917), 94-98.
3. S. Hilgenfeldt, M. P. Brenner, S. Grossmann and D. Lohse, Analysis of Rayleigh- Plesset dynamics for sonoluminescing bubbles, J. Fluid Mech. 365 (1998) 171-204. (Pubitemid 128506298)
4. S. Nagrath et al., Hydrodynamic simulation of air bubble implosion using a level set approach, J. Comput. Phys. 215 (2006) 98-132. (Pubitemid 43695593)
5. M. Orr and M. Schoenberg, Acoustic signatures from deep water implosions of spherical cavities, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 59 (1976) 1155.
6. B. E. McDonald and C. Holland, Decay of large underwater bubble oscillations, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 107 (2000) 3084.
7. M. S. Plesset and A. Prosperetti, Bubble dynamics and cavitation, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 9 (1977) 145-185.
8. A. Prosperetti and A. Lezzi, Bubble dynamics in a compressible liquid, Part 1: Firstorder theory, J. Fluid Mech. 168 (1986) 457-478. (Pubitemid 16633300)
9. V. A. Bogoyavlenskiy, Single-bubble sonoluminescence: Shape stability analysis of collapse dynamics in a semianalytical approach, Phys. Rev. E 62 (2000) 2158.
10. C. E. Brennan, Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics (Oxford Univ. Press, 1995).
11. S. E. Turner, Underwater implosion of glass spheres, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 121 (2007) 844.
12. G. J. Heard, M. McDonald, N. R. Chapman and L. Jaschke, Underwater light bulb implosions: A useful acoustic source, in OCEANS'97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2 (IEEE, 1997), pp. 755-762.
13. J. J. Cor and T. F. Miller, Theoretical analysis of hydrostatic implodable volumes with solid inner structures, J. Fluids Struct. 25 (2009) 284-303.
14. U. S. Navy, The navy unmanned undersea vehicle (UUV) master plan, US Navy, November 9, 2004.
15. G. L. Chahine, K. M. Kalumuck and R. Duraiswami, Fluid-structure interaction simulation of bubble dynamics by coupling fluid bem and structural fem codes, ASME Fluids Engrg. Div. 176 (1993) 39-50.
16. Z. Zong, A hydroplastic analysis of a free-free beam floating on water subjected to an underwater bubble, J. Fluids Struct. 20 (2005) 359-372.
17. E. Klaseboer, B. C. Khoo and K. C. Hung, Dynamics of an oscillating bubble near a floating structure, J. Fluids Struct. 21 (2005) 395-412. (Pubitemid 41700344)
18. S. Iakovlev, Submerged fluid-filled cylindrical shell subjected to a shock wave: Fluid- structure interaction effects, J. Fluids Struct. 23 (2007) 117-142. (Pubitemid 44849130)
19. C. Farhat, A. Rallu and S. Shankaran, A higher-order generalized ghost fluid method for the poor for the three-dimensional two-phase flow computation of underwater implosions, J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2008) 7674-7700.
20. C. Farhat, A. Rallu, K. Wang and T. Belytschko, Robust and provably second-order explicit-explicit and implicit-explicit staggered time-integrators for highly nonlinear compressible fluid-structure interaction problems, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 84 (2010) 73-107.
21. S. R. Idelsohn, E. Oñate and F. D. Pin, The particle finite element method: A powerful tool to solve incompressible flows with free-surfaces and breaking waves, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 61 (2004) 964-989. (Pubitemid 39403765)
22. E. Oñate, S. R. Idelsohn, F. Del Pin and R. Aubry, The particle finite element method. An overview, Int. J. Comput. Methods 1 (2004) 267-307.
23. K. Kamran, R. Rossi, E. Oñate and S. R. Idelsohn, A compressible Lagrangian framework for the simulation of the underwater implosion of large air bubbles, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., submitted, 2012.
24. G. Scovazzi, J. N. Shadid, E. Love and W. J. Rider, A conservative nodal variational multiscale method for Lagrangian shock hydrodynamics, Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 199 (2010) 3059-3100.
25. E. Oñate and F. Zarate, Rotation-free triangular plate and shell elements, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 47 (2000) 557-603. (Pubitemid 30527733)
26. S. R. Idelsohn, M. Mier-Torrecilla and E. Oñate, Multi-fluid flows with the particle finite element method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 198 (2009) 2750-2767.
27. K. Kamran, R. Rossi and E. Oñate, A contact algorithm for shell problems via the particle finite element method (PFEM), Comput. Mech., Submitted.
28. J. Oliver, S. Hartmann, J. C. Cante, R. Weyler and J. A. Herńandez, A contact domain method for large deformation frictional contact problems. Part 1: Theoretical basis, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 198 (2009) 2591-2606.
29. T. J. R. Hughes, Multiscale phenomena: Green's functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles and the origins of stabilized methods, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 127 (1995) 387-401.
30. Toro, E. F. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction (Springer, 2009).
31. T. J. R. Hughes, G. R. Feij́oo, L. Mazzei and J. B. Quincy, The variational multiscale method - A paradigm for computational mechanics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 166 (1998) 3-24.
32. K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Multiscale space-time fluid-structure interaction techniques, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 247-267.
33. K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Space-time fluid-structure interaction methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 22 (2012) 1230001.
34. K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, T. E. Tezduyar, M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, Stabilized space-time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 333-344.
35. K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, D. Montes, T. E. Tezduyar, M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, Numerical-performance studies for the stabilized space-time computation of windturbine rotor aerodynamics, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 647-657.
36. K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, A. Puntel, T. Spielman and T. E. Tezduyar, Space-time computational techniques for the aerodynamics of flapping wings, J. Appl. Mech. 79 (2012) 010903.
37. T. J. R. Hughes and T. E. Tezduyar, Finite element methods for first-order hyperbolic systems with particular emphasis on the compressible euler equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 45 (1984) 217-284. (Pubitemid 14640721)
38. G. J. Le Beau, S. E. Ray, S. K. Aliabadi and T. E. Tezduyar, SUPG finite element computation of compressible flows with the entropy and conservation variables formulations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 104 (1993) 397-422.
39. T. E. Tezduyar and M. Senga, Stabilization and shock-capturing parameters in SUPG formulation of compressible flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195 (2006) 1621-1632. (Pubitemid 43116267)
40. T. E. Tezduyar and M. Senga, SUPG finite element computation of inviscid supersonic flows with yzβ shock-capturing, Computers Fluids 36 (2007) 147-159. (Pubitemid 44615425)
41. M. Senga, T. E. Tezduyar and D. Vicker, Computation of inviscid supersonic flows around cylinders and spheres with the SUPG formulation and yzβ shock-capturing, Comput. Mech. 38 (2006) 469-481. (Pubitemid 43967454)
42. R. Codina, Finite element approximation of the hyperbolic wave equation in mixed form, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 (2008) 1305-1322.
43. F. G. Flores and E. Oñate, Improvements in the membrane behaviour of the three node rotation-free BST shell triangle using an assumed strain approach, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 194 (2005) 907-932. (Pubitemid 39660451)
44. E. Oñate and F. G. Flores, Advances in the formulation of the rotation-free basic shell triangle, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 194 (2005) 2406-2443. (Pubitemid 40465029)
45. K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Computational methods for parachute fluid- structure interactions, Arch. Comput. Methods Engrg. 19 (2012) 125-169.
46. T. E. Tezduyar and S. Sathe, Modelling of fluid-structure interactions with the space- time finite elements: Solution techniques, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 54 (2007) 855-900. (Pubitemid 47009683)
47. S. Sathe and T. E. Tezduyar, Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space- time finite elements: Contact problems, Comput. Mech. 43 (2008) 51-60.
48. K. Takizawa, T. Spielman and T. E. Tezduyar, Space-time FSI modeling and dynamical analysis of spacecraft parachutes and parachute clusters, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 345-364.
49. R. Rossi and E. Oñate, Analysis of some partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure interaction, Engineering Comput.: Int. J. Computer-Aided Engrg. 27 (2010) 20-56.
50. P. B. Ryzhakov, R. Rossi, S. R. Idelsohn and E. Oñate, A monolithic Lagrangian approach for fluid-structure interaction problems, Comput. Mech. 46 (2010) 883-899.
51. S. R. Idelsohn, F. Del Pin, R. Rossi and E. Oñate, Fluid-structure interaction problems with strong added-mass effect, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 80 (2009) 1261-1294.
52. T. E. Tezduyar, S. Sathe, R. Keedy and K. Stein, Space-time finite element techniques for computation of fluid-structure interactions, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 195 (2006) 2002-2027. (Pubitemid 43193531)
53. R. Menikoff and B. J. Plohr, The Riemann problem for fluid flow of real materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 75.
54. T. J. R. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Vol. 65 (Dover Publications, 2000).
55. K. E. Jansen, C. H. Whiting and G. M. Hulbert, A generalized α method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190 (2000) 305-319.
56. A. N. Brook and T. J. R. Hughes, Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 32 (1982) 199-259.
57. A. J. Barlow, A compatible finite element multi-material ale hydrodynamics algorithm, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 56 (2008) 953-964. (Pubitemid 351385432)
58. J. C. Campbell and M. J. Shashkov, A compatible Lagrangian hydrodynamics algorithm for unstructured grids, 2000.
59. V. A. Dobrev, T. E. Ellis, T. V. Kolev and R. N. Rieben, Curvilinear finite elements for Lagrangian hydrodynamics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 65 (2011) 1295-1310.
60. S. R. Idelsohn, M. Mier-Torrecilla, N. Nigro and E. Oñate, On the analysis of heterogeneous fluids with jumps in the viscosity using a discontinuous pressure field, Comput. Mech. 46 (2010) 115-124.
61. T. Tezduyar, S. Aliabadi, M. Behr, A. Johnson and S. Mittal, Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows, Computer 26 (1993) 27-36.
62. A. A. Johnson and T. E. Tezduyar, Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 119 (1994) 73-94. (Pubitemid 289971)
63. K. Stein, T. Tezduyar and R. Benney, Mesh moving techniques for fluid-structure interactions with large displacements, J. Appl. Mech. 70 (2003) 58-63.
64. K. Stein, T. E. Tezduyar and R. Benney, Automatic mesh update with the solidextension mesh moving technique, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193 (2004) 2019-2032. (Pubitemid 38463395)
65. H. Si and A. TetGen, A Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator and Three-Dimensional Delaunay Triangulator (Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastic, Berlin, Germany, 2006).
66. A. A. Johnson and T. E. Tezduyar, 3D simulation of fluid-particle interactions with the number of particles reaching 100, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 145 (1997) 301-321.