Replicating the Impact of a Supplemental Beginning Reading Intervention: The Role of Instructional Context

Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-23

  Coyne, Michael D ^a   Little, Mary ^c   Rawlinson, D'Ann ^c   Simmons, Deborah ^b   Kwok, Oi Man ^b   Kim, Minjun ^b   Simmons, Leslie ^b   Hagan Burke, Shanna ^b   Civetelli, Christina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Beginning reading; experimental research; kindergarten students; replication study; supplemental intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872368291     PISSN: 19345747     EISSN: 19345739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2012.706694     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Educational Sciences Reform Act of 2002. Pub. L. 107-279, 116 Stat. 1939 (2002)
2. Beck, I. L., Farr, R. C. and Strickland, D. S. 2007. Harcourt trophies, Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
3. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57: 289-300.
4. Cordray, D. S. and Pion, G. M. 2006. "Treatment strength and integrity: Models and methods". In Strengthening research methodology: Psychological measurement and evaluation, Edited by: Bootzin, R. R. and McKnight, P. E. 103-124. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11384-006
5. Dane, A. V. and Schneider, B. H. 1998. Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control?. Clinical Psychology Review, 18: 23-45.
6. Dunn, L. M. and Dunn, L. M. 1997. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Third Edition (PPVT-III), Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
7. Florida Center for Reading Research. 2005. Kindergarten and first grade student center activities, Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education.
8. Fritz, J. M. and Cleland, J. A. 2003. Effectiveness versus efficacy: More than a debate over language. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 3: 163-165.
9. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L.McMaster, K. 2001. Peer Assisted Learning Strategies: Kindergarten reading, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
10. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L, Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N., Braun, M. and O'Connor, R. 2001. Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93: 251-267.
11. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C. and Innocenti, M. S. 2005. Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71: 149-164.
12. Good, R. H. and Kaminski, R. A. 2002. Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.), Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
13. Gresham, F. M., MacMillan, D. L., Beebe-Frankenberger, M. E. and Bocian, K. M. 2000. Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented?. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15: 198-205.
14. Hedges, L. V. 2007. Effect sizes in cluster-randomized designs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32: 341-370. doi:10.3102/1076998606298043
15. Hox, J. 2002. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Just Read, Florida. 2005. K-12 comprehensive research-based reading plan state board rule. Retrieved from http://www.justreadflorida.com/docs/6A-6-053.pdf
17. Lemons, C. J., Fuchs, D. and Fuchs, L. S. Evidence of kindergarten children's improved reading performance across 9 years in an urban school district: Implications for intervention research and educational policy. Poster presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, Coronado, CA,
18. McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Saenz, L., Lemons, C. J., Kearns, D., Yen, L. and Fuchs, L. S. 2010. Scaling up PALS: Importance of implementing evidence-based practice with fidelity and flexibility. New Times for DLD: Division for Learning Disabilities, 28: 1-4.
19. National Early Literacy Panel. 2008. Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel, Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
20. National Reading Panel. 2000. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Retrieved from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/
21. National Research Council. 2002. Scientific research in education, Edited by: Shavelson, R. and Towne, L. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. and Congdon, R. 2004. HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling, Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
23. Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D. and Foorman, B. R. 2004. Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96: 265-282. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265
24. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for general causal inference, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Simmons, D. C., Coyne, M. D., Hagan-Burke, S., Kwok, O., Simmons, L., Johnson, C. and Crevecoeur, Y. 2011. Effects of supplemental reading interventions in anthertic contexts: A comparison of kindergartners' response. Exceptional Children, 77: 207-228. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265
26. Van IJzendoorn, M. H. 1994. A process model of replication studies: On the relation between different types of replication, Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Library.
27. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. and Rashotte, C. A. 1999. Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing, Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
28. What Works Clearinghouse. 2008. Procedures and standards handbook, version 2.0 [Electronic version] Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_procedures_v2_standards_handbook.pdf
29. Woodcock, R. W. 1987. Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised/Normative update, Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments. 1998