4D imaging reveals a shift in chromosome segregation dynamics during mouse pre-implantation development

Cell Cycle

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 157-165

  Yamagata, Kazuo ^a   FitzHarris, Greg ^b  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaphase; Chromosome segregation; Embryo; Metaphase; Spindle

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; EMBRYO; FLUORESCENCE; FOUR DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; INTERPHASE; METAPHASE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; TELOPHASE;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84872357747     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.23052     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Fragouli E, Wells D. Aneuploidy in the human blastocyst. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011; 133:149-59; PMID:21252488; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000323500.
2. Harper JC, Pergament E, Delhanty JD. Genetics of gametes and embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115(Suppl 1):S80-4; PMID:15196722; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.018.
3. Maiato H, Lince-Faria M. The perpetual movements of anaphase. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010; 67:2251-69; PMID:20306325; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010- 0327-5.
4. Ris H. The anaphase movement of chromosomes in the spermatocytes of the grasshopper. Biol Bull 1949; 96:90-106; PMID:18108895; http://dx.doi.org/10. 2307/1538001.
5. Compton DA. Spindle assembly in animal cells. Annu Rev Biochem 2000; 69:95-114; PMID:10966454; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.95.
6. Walczak CE, Cai S, Khodjakov A. Mechanisms of chromosome behaviour during mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:91-102; PMID:20068571.
7. Greenan G, Brangwynne CP, Jaensch S, Gharakhani J, Jülicher F, Hyman AA. Centrosome size sets mitotic spindle length in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Curr Biol 2010; 20:353-8; PMID:20137951; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2009.12.050.
8. Wühr M, Chen Y, Dumont S, Groen AC, Needleman DJ, Salic A, et al. Evidence for an upper limit to mitotic spindle length. Curr Biol 2008; 18:1256-61; PMID:18718761; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.092.
9. Hara Y, Kimura A. Cell-size-dependent spindle elongation in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo. Curr Biol 2009; 19:1549-54; PMID:19682904; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.050.
10. Courtois A, Schuh M, Ellenberg J, Hiiragi T. The transition from meiotic to mitotic spindle assembly is gradual during early mammalian development. J Cell Biol 2012; 198:357-70; PMID:22851319; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb. 201202135.
11. Schuh M, Ellenberg J. Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during acentrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. Cell 2007; 130:484-98; PMID:17693257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.025.
12. Breuer M, Kolano A, Kwon M, Li CC, Tsai TF, Pellman D, et al. HURP permits MTOC sorting for robust meiotic spindle bipolarity, similar to extra centrosome clustering in cancer cells. J Cell Biol 2010; 191:1251-60; PMID:21173113; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201005065.
13. Dumont J, Petri S, Pellegrin F, Terret ME, Bohnsack MT, Rassinier P, et al. A centriole- and RanGTP-independent spindle assembly pathway in meiosis I of vertebrate oocytes. J Cell Biol 2007; 176:295-305; PMID:17261848; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200605199.
14. Kitajima TS, Ohsugi M, Ellenberg J. Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes. Cell 2011; 146:568-81; PMID:21854982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.031.
15. Fitzharris G. A shift from kinesin 5-dependent metaphase spindle function during pre-implantation development in mouse. Development 2009; 136:2111-9; PMID:19465601; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.035089.
16. FitzHarris G. Anaphase B precedes anaphase A in the mouse egg. Curr Biol 2012; 22:437-44; PMID:22342753; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.041.
17. Lane SI, Yun Y, Jones KT. Timing of anaphase-promoting complex activation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension. Development 2012; 139:1947-55; PMID:22513370; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.077040.
18. Lister LM, Kouznetsova A, Hyslop LA, Kalleas D, Pace SL, Barel JC, et al. Age-related meiotic segregation errors in mammalian oocytes are preceded by depletion of cohesin and Sgo2. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1511-21; PMID:20817533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.023.
19. Chiang T, Duncan FE, Schindler K, Schultz RM, Lampson MA. Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1522-8; PMID:20817534; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2010.06.069.
20. Yamagata K, Suetsugu R, Wakayama T. Long-term, six-dimensional live-cell imaging for the mouse pre-implantation embryo that does not affect full-term development. J Reprod Dev 2009; 55:343-50; PMID:19305125; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1262/jrd.20166.
21. Kubiak JZ, Chesnel F, Richard-Parpaillon L, Bazile F, Pascal A, Polanski Z, et al. Temporal regulation of the first mitosis in Xenopus and mouse embryos. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2008; 282:63-9; PMID:18178304; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. mce.2007.11.023.
22. Sikora-Polaczek M, Hupalowska A, Polanski Z, Kubiak JZ, Ciemerych MA. The first mitosis of the mouse embryo is prolonged by transitional metaphase arrest. Biol Reprod 2006; 74:734-43; PMID:16382027; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/ biolreprod.105.047092.
23. Hara Y, Kimura A. Cell-size-dependent control of organelle sizes during development. Results Probl Cell Differ 2011; 53:93-108; PMID:21630142; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19065-0-5.
24. Jorgensen P, Tyers M. How cells coordinate growth and division. Curr Biol 2004; 14:R1014-27; PMID:15589139; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.027.
25. Brust-Mascher I, Civelekoglu-Scholey G, Kwon M, Mogilner A, Scholey JM. Model for anaphase B: role of three mitotic motors in a switch from poleward flux to spindle elongation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:15938-43; PMID:15522967; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407044101.
26. Brust-Mascher I, Scholey JM. Microtubule flux and sliding in mitotic spindles of Drosophila embryos. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:3967-75; PMID:12429839; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.02-05-0069.
27. Dumont J, Oegema K, Desai A. A kinetochore-independent mechanism drives anaphase chromosome separation during acentrosomal meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:894-901; PMID:20729837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2093.
28. Mayr MI, Hümmer S, Bormann J, Grüner T, Adio S, Woehlke G, et al. The human kinesin Kif18A is a motile microtubule depolymerase essential for chromosome congression. Curr Biol 2007; 17:488-98; PMID:17346968; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.036.
29. Salmon ED, Cimini D, Cameron LA, DeLuca JG. Merotelic kinetochores in mammalian tissue cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005; 360:553-68; PMID:15897180; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1610.
30. Dechant R, Glotzer M. Centrosome separation and central spindle assembly act in redundant pathways that regulate microtubule density and trigger cleavage furrow formation. Dev Cell 2003; 4:333-44; PMID:12636915; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S1534-5807(03)00057-1.
31. Glotzer M. Cleavage furrow positioning. J Cell Biol 2004; 164:347-51; PMID:14757750; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200310112.
32. von Dassow G; von. Concurrent cues for cytokinetic furrow induction in animal cells. Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19:165-73; PMID:19285868; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.01.008.
33. Glotzer M. The molecular requirements for cytokinesis. Science 2005; 307:1735-9; PMID:15774750; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1096896.
34. Levi M, Maro B, Shalgi R. Fyn kinase is involved in cleavage furrow ingression during meiosis and mitosis. Reproduction 2010; 140:827-34; PMID:20841362; http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-10-0312.
35. Hamatani T, Carter MG, Sharov AA, Ko MS. Dynamics of global gene expression changes during mouse pre-implantation development. Dev Cell 2004; 6:117-31; PMID:14723852; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00373-3.
36. Li L, Zheng P, Dean J. Maternal control of early mouse development. Development 2010; 137:859-70; PMID:20179092; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev. 039487.
37. Goshima G, Scholey JM. Control of mitotic spindle length. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010; 26:21-57; PMID:20604709; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev- cellbio-100109-104006.
38. Dumont S, Mitchison TJ. Force and length in the mitotic spindle. Curr Biol 2009; 19:R749-61; PMID:19906577; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07. 028.
39. Rogers GC, Rogers SL, Sharp DJ. Spindle microtubules in flux. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:1105-16; PMID:15764594; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02284.
40. Ems-McClung SC, Walczak CE. Kinesin-13s in mitosis: Key players in the spatial and temporal organization of spindle microtubules. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2010; 21:276-82; PMID:20109574; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.01.016.
41. Howard J, Hyman AA. Microtubule polymerases and depolymerases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007; 19:31-5; PMID:17184986; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2006.12. 009.
42. Schuh M, Ellenberg J. A new model for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes. Curr Biol 2008; 18:1986-92; PMID:19062278; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2008.11.022.
43. Azoury J, Lee KW, Georget V, Rassinier P, Leader B, Verlhac MH. Spindle positioning in mouse oocytes relies on a dynamic meshwork of actin filaments. Curr Biol 2008; 18:1514-9; PMID:18848445; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008. 08.044.
44. Yi K, Unruh JR, Deng M, Slaughter BD, Rubinstein B, Li R. Dynamic maintenance of asymmetric meiotic spindle position through Arp2/3-complex-driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:1252-8; PMID:21874009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2320.
45. Woolner S, O'Brien LL, Wiese C, Bement WM. Myosin-10 and actin filaments are essential for mitotic spindle function. J Cell Biol 2008; 182:77-88; PMID:18606852; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200804062.