Invasion of central-European habitats by the moss Campylopus introflexus

Preslia

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 863-886

  Mikulášková, Eva ^a,b   Fajmonová, Zuzana ^a,c   Hájek, Michal ^a,c  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Campylopus introflexus; Central Europe; Cultivation; Invasive species; Plant communities; Threat

Indexed keywords

ACID SOIL; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; CONIFEROUS FOREST; CULTIVATION; DATA SET; DATABASE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; INVASIVE SPECIES; MOSS; PLANT COMMUNITY; PLANTATION; VASCULAR PLANT;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; CAMPYLOPUS INTROFLEXUS; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 84872314163     PISSN: 00327786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Berg C. (1985): Zur Ökologie der neophytischen Laubmoosart Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. in Mecklenburg. - Arch. Freunde. Naturgesch. Meckl. 25:117-126.
2. Biermann R. & Daniëls F. J. A. (1995): Campylopus introflexus (Dicranaceae, Bryopsida) in Flechtenreichen Silber-Grasfluren Mitteleuropas. - In: Daniëls F. J. A., Schulz M. & Peine J. (eds), Flechten Follmann. Contributions to lichenology in Honour of Gerhard Follmann, p. 493-500, Botanical Institute, University of Cologne, Cologne.
3. Biermann R. & Daniëls F. J. A. (1997): Changes in a lichen-rich dry sand grassland vegetation with special reference to lichen synusiae and Campylopus introflexus. - Phytocoenologia 27:257-273.
4. Biermann R. & Daniëls F. J. A. (2001): Vegetationsdynamik im Spergulo-Corynephoretum unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des neophytischen Laubmooses Campylopus introflexus. - Braunschweiger Geobotanische Arbeiten 8:27-37.
5. Carranza M. L., Ricotta C., Carboni M. & Acosta A. T. R. (2011): Habitat selection by invasive plants: a bootstrap approach. - Preslia 83:529-536.
6. Chiarucci A., Calderisi M., Casini F. & Bonini I. (2008): Vegetation at the limits for vegetation: vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in a geothermal field. - Folia Geobot. 43:19-33.
7. Chytrý M., Kučera T., Kočí M., Grulich V. & Lustyk P. (eds) (2010): Katalog biotopu České republiky [Habitat cataloque of the Czech Republic]. Ed. 2. - Agentura ochrany prírody a krajiny ČR, Praha.
8. Chytrý M., Maskell L. C., Pino J., Pyšek P., Vilà M., Font X. & Smart S. M. (2008): Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. - J. Appl. Ecol. 45:448-458. (Pubitemid 351406227)
9. Chytrý M., Pyšek P., Tichý L., Knollová I. & Danihelka J. (2005): Invasionsbyalien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitative assessment across habitats. - Preslia 77:339-354. (Pubitemid 43273630)
10. Chytrý M., Pyšek P., Wild J., Pino J., Maskell L. C. & Vilà M. (2009): European map of alien plant invasions based on the quantitative assessment across habitats. - Diversity Distrib. 15:98-107.
11. Chytrý M. & Rafajová M. (2003): Czech National Phytosociological database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. - Preslia 75:1-15. (Pubitemid 36608190)
12. Chytrý M., Tichý L., Holt J. & Botta-Dukát Z. (2002): Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. - J. Veg. Sci. 13:79-90. (Pubitemid 34414170)
13. DAISIE (2009): Handbook of alien species in Europe. - Springer, Berlin.
14. Danihelka J., Chrtek J. Jr. & Kaplan Z. (2012): Checklist of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. - Preslia 84:647-811.
15. Ellenberg H., Weber H. E., Düll R., Wirth W., Werner W. & Paulissen D. (1992): Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Ed. 2. - Scripta Geobot. 18:1-258.
16. Equihua M. & Usher M. B. (1993): Impact of carpets of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on Calluna vulgaris regeneration. - J. Ecol. 81:359-365.
17. Essl F. & Lambdon P. W. (2009): The alien bryophytes and lichens of Europe. - In: DAISIE, Handbook of alien species in Europe, p. 29-41, Springer, Berlin.
18. Essl F., Rabitsch W. & Lambdon P. (2011): Bryophytes and lichens. - In: Simberloff D. & Rejmánek M. (eds), Encyclopedia of biological invasions, p. 81-85, University of Carolina Press, London.
19. Frahm J. P. (1984): Phytogeography of European Campylopus species. - In: Váňa J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Meeting of Bryologists of Central and East Europe, p. 191-212, Karolinum, Prague.
20. Frahm J. P. (2007): Campylopus introflexus. - Flora of North America 27:371, URL: http://www.efloras.org/florataxon. aspx?flora-id=1&taxon-id= 105474 (accessed 20 September 2011).
21. Hájek M., Roleček J., Cottenie K., Kintrová K., Horsák M., Poulíčková A., Hájková P., Fránková M. & Dítě D. (2011): Environmental and spatial controls of biotic assemblages in a discrete semi-terrestrial habitat: comparison of organisms with different dispersal abilities sampled in the same plots. - J. Biogeogr. 38:1683-1693.
22. Hájková P., Hájek M., Rybníček K., Jiroušek M., Tichý L., Králová Š. & Mikulášková E. (2011): Long-term vegetation changes in bogs exposed to high amospheric deposition, aerial liming and climate fluctuation. - J. Veg. Sci. 22:891-904.
23. Hasse T. (2007): Campylopus introflexus invasion in a dune grassland: succession, disturbance and relevance of existing plant invader concepts. - Herzogia 20:305-315.
24. Hasse T. & Daniëls F. J. A. (2006): Species responses to experimentally induced habitat changes in a Corynephorus grassland. - J. Veg. Sci. 17:135-146. (Pubitemid 44185529)
25. Hassel K. & Söderström L. (2005): The expansion of the alien mosses Orthodontium lineare and Campylopus introflexus in Britain and continental Europe. - J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 97:183-193. (Pubitemid 40240886)
26. Hedenäs L., Herben T., Rydin H. & Söderström L. (1989a): Ecology of the invading moss species Orthodontium lineare in Sweden: substrate preference and interaction with other species. - J. Bryol. 15:565-581.
27. Hedenäs L., Herben T., Rydin H. & Söderström L. (1989b): Ecology of the invading moss species Orthodontium lineare in Sweden: spatial distribution and population structure. - Holartic Ecol. 12:163-172.
28. Hejda M., Pyšek P., Pergl J., Sádlo J., Chytrý M. & Jarošík V. (2009): Invasion success of alien plants: do habitat affinities in the native distribution range matter? - Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18:372-382.
29. Herben T. (1994): Local rate of spreading and patch dynamics of an invasive moss species, Orthodontium lineare. - J. Bryol. 18:115-125.
30. Hill M. O. (1979): TWINSPAN - A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of individuals and attributes. - Cornell University, Ithaca.
31. Ketner-Oostra R. & Sýkora K. V. (2000): Vegetation succession and lichen diversity on dry coastal calcium-poor dunes and the impact of management experiments. - J. Coast. Cons. 6:191-206. (Pubitemid 32180603)
32. Ketner-Oostra R. & Sýkora K. V. (2004): Decline of lichen-diversity in calcium-poor coastal dune vegetation since the 1970s, related to grass and moss encroachment. - Phytocoenologia 34:521-549.
33. Klinck J. (2008): The alien invasive moss Campylopus introflexus in the Danish coastal dune system. - Master thesis, Copenhagen University.
34. Konvalinková P. (2010): Spontaneous vegetation succession in mined peatlands. - Dissertation, University of South Bohemia.
35. Kučera J. (2004): Campylopus introflexus. In: Kučera J. (ed), Mechorosty České republiky [Bryophytes of the Czech Republic], URL: http://botanika.bf.jcu.cz/bryoweb/klic (accessed 24. September 2011).
36. Kučera J., Váňa J. & Hradílek Z. (2012): Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis. - Preslia 84:813-850.
37. Lambdon P. W., Pyšek P., Basnou C., Hejda M., Arianoutsou M., Essl F., Jarošík V., Pergl J., Winter M., Anastasiu P., Andriopoulos P., Bazos I., Brundu G., Celesti-Grapow L., Chassot P., Delipetrou P., Josefsson M., Kark S., Klotz S., Kokkoris Y., Kühn I., Marchante H., Perglová I., Pino J., Vilà M., Zikos A., Roy D. & Hulme P. E. (2008): Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. - Preslia 80:101-149.
38. Mikulášková E. (2006): Vývoj rozšíření neofytického mechu Campylopus introflexus v České republice [Development in distribution of the neophytic moss Campylopus introflexus in the Czech Republic]. - Bryonora 38:1-10.
39. Moravcová L., Pyšek P., Jarošík V., Havlíčková V. & Zákravský P. (2010): Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. - Preslia 82:365-390.
40. Moravec J. (ed.) (1995): Rostlinná společenstva České republiky a jejich ohrožení [Red list of plant communities of the Czech Republic and their endangerment]. Ed. 2. - Severočes. Přír., Suppl. 1995:1-206.
41. Moravec J. (ed.) (1998): Přehled vegetace České republiky 1. Acidofilní doubravy [Vegetation Survey of the Czech Republic 1. Acidophilous Oak Forests]. - Academia, Praha.
42. Moravec J. (ed.) (2000): Přehled vegetace České republiky2. Hygrofilní, mezofilní a xerofilní opadavé lesy [Vegetation Survey of the Czech Republic 2. Hygrophilous, mesophilous and xerophilous deciduous forests]. - Academia, Praha.
43. Moravec J. (ed.) (2002): Přehled vegetace České republiky 3. Jehličnaté lesy [Vegetation Survey of the Czech Republic 3. Coniferous forests]. - Academia, Praha.
44. Mulligan R. C. & Gignac L. D. (2001): Bryophyte community structure in a boreal poor fen: reciprocal transplants. - Can. J. Bot. 79:404-411. (Pubitemid 32783837)
45. Novotný I. (1990): The moss Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. new to Czechoslovakia. - Acta Mus. Moraviae Sci. Nat. 75:237-238.
46. Pecháčková S. & Peksa O. (2010): Fytocenologická studie acidofilních boru Plzeňska [Phytosociological study of acidophilic pine forests in Pilsen region (Czech Republic)]. - Final project report, West-Bohemian Museum in Pilzen.
47. Pinheiro J., Bates D., Deb Roy S., Sarkar D. & R Development Core Team (2011): nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. - R package version 3.1-101.
48. Pinke G., Karácsony P., Czúcz B. & Botta-Dukát Z. (2011): Environmental and land-use variables determining the abundance of Artemisia ambrosiifolia in arable fields in Hungary. - Preslia 83:219-236.
49. Pyšek P. & Richardson D. M. (2007): Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? - In: Nentwig W. (ed.), Biological invasions, p. 97-125, Springer, Berlin.
50. Development Core Team (2010): R: a language and environment for statistical computing. - R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ienna, URL: ttp://www.r-project.org accessed 24 September 2011).
51. Richards P. W. (1963): Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. and C. polytrichoides De Not. in the British Isles: a preliminary account. Trans. Br. Bryol. Soc. 4:404-417.
52. Roleček J., Tichý L., Zelený D. & Chytrý M. (2009): Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. - J. Veg. Sci. 20:596-602.
53. Sakai A.-K., Allendorf F. W., Holt J. S., Lodge D. M., Molofsky J., With K. A., Baughman S., Cabin R. J., Cohen J. E., Ellstrand N. C., McCauley D. E., O'Neil P., Parker I. M., Thompson J. N. & Weller S. G. (2001): The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32:305-332. (Pubitemid 34043164)
54. Schirmel J., Timler L. & Buchholz S. (2011): Impact of he invasive moss ampylopus introflexus on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) in acidic coastal dunes at the southern Baltic Sea. Biol. Inv. 13:605-620.
55. Schlüsslmayr G. (2005): Soziologische Moosflora des südöstlichen Oberösterreich. Stapfia 84:1-695.
56. Schooler S. S., Cook T., Prichard G. & Yeates A. G. (2010): Disturbance-mediated competition: the interacting roles of inundation regime and mechanical and herbicidal control in determining native and invasive plant abundance. Biol. Inv. 12:3289-3298.
57. Simberloff D. & Rejmánek M. eds) (2011): Encyclopedia of iological invasions. University of Carolina Press, London.
58. Söderström L. (1992): Invasions and range expansions and contractions of bryophytes. - In: Bates J. W. & Farmer A. M. (eds), Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment, p. 131-158, Clarendon Press, New York & Oxford University Press, Oxford. (Pubitemid 24411720)
59. Soldán Z. (1996): Rozšíření neofytických mechu Campylopus introflexus a Orthodontium lineare v České republice [Distribution of neophytic mosses Campylopus introflexus and Orthodontium lineare in the Czech Republic]. - Bryonora 18:10-19.
60. Soldán Z. (1997): Invazní mechorosty [Invasive bryophytes]. - Zpr. Čes. Bot. Společ. 14:33-39.
61. Soldán Z. & Kučera J. (2004): Orthodontium lineare. - In: Kučera J. (ed.), Mechorosty České republiky [Bryophytes of the Czech Republic], URL: http://botanika.bf.jcu.cz/bryoweb/klic (acessed 30 June 2012)..
62. Sparrius L. B. & Kooijman A. M. (2011): Invasiveness of Campylopus introflexus in drift sands depends on nitrogen deposition and soil organic matter. - Appl. Veg. Sci. 14:221-229.
63. Størmer P. (1958): Some mosses from the phytogeographical excursion 1-9 through the Armorican massive in 1954. - Rev. Bryol. Lichénol. 27:13-16.
64. ter Braak J. F. & Šmilauer P. (2002): CANOCO: Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 45). - Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, N Y.
65. Tichý L. (2002): JUICE, software for vegetation classification. - J. Veg. Sci. 13:451-453.
66. Tichý L. (2005): New similarity indices for the assignment of relevés to the vegetation units of an existing phytosociological classification. - Pl. Ecol. 179:67-72. (Pubitemid 40870308)
67. Tichý L. & Chytrý M. (2006): Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size. - J. Veg. Sci. 17:809-818. (Pubitemid 46232636)
68. van der Meulen F., van der Hagen H. & Kruijsen B. (1987): Campylopus introflexus: invasion of a moss in Dutch coastal dunes. - Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. 90:73-80.
69. Vězda A. & Liška J. (1999): Katalog lišejníku České republiky [Catalogue of lichens of the Czech Republic]. - Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Pruhonice.
70. Westhoff V. & van der Maarel E. (1978): The Braun-Blanquet approach. - In: Whittaker R. H. (ed.), Classification of plant communities, p. 289-399, W. Junk, The Hague.
71. Williamson M. (1996): Biological invasions. - Chapman & Hall, New York.
72. Zerbe S. & Wirth P. (2006): Non-indigenous plant species and their ecological range in Central European pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests. - Ann. For. Sci. 63:189-203. (Pubitemid 43724891)
73. Winter M., Schweiger O., Klotz S., Nentwig W., Andriopoulos P., Arianoutsou M., Basnou C., Delipetrou P., Didžiulis V., Hejda M., Hulme P. E., Lambdon P. W., Pergl J., Pyšek P., Roy D. B. & Kühn I. (2009): Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:21721-21725
74. Zuur A. F., Ieno E. N., Walker N. J., Saveliev A. A. & Smith G. M. (2009): Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. - Springer, New York.