Subjective quality evaluation of the upcoming HEVC video compression standard

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 8499, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Hanhart, Philippe ^a   Rerabek, Martin ^a   De Simone, Francesca ^a   Ebrahimi, Touradj ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

H.264 MPEG 4 Part 10 AVC; High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC); Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT VC); Subjective quality assessment

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE TEAMS; COMPRESSION STANDARDS; H.264/MPEG-4 PART 10; HIGH EFFICIENCY VIDEO CODING (HEVC); PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY ASSESSMENTS; VIDEO COMPRESSION STANDARDS;

EFFICIENCY; HIGH DEFINITION TELEVISION; IMAGE CODING; IMAGE COMPRESSION; VIDEO SIGNAL PROCESSING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84872310304     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.946036     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. ISO, "Information technology - Coding of audio-visual objects - Part 10: Advanced Video Coding," Tech. Rep. ISO/IEC 14496-10:2005, ISO/IEC (2005).
2. ISO, "Joint Call for Proposals on Video Compression Technology," Tech. Rep. N11113, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 ITU-T Q6/16 Visual Coding, Kyoto, JP (Jan 2010).
3. ISO, "Report of subjective testing of responses to Joint Call for Proposals (CfP) on video coding technology for High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)," Tech. Rep. M24092, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Dresden, Germany (April 2010).
4. Sullivan, G. J. and Ohm, J.-R., "Recent developments in standardization of high efficiency video coding (HEVC)," Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXIII 7798(1), 77980V, SPIE (2010).
5. ISO, "JCT-VC AHG report: Software development and HM software technical evaluation," Tech. Rep. M19119, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Daegu, Korea (January 2011).
6. De Simone, F., Goldmann, L., Lee, J.-S., and Ebrahimi, T., "Towards high efficiency video coding: Subjective evaluation of potential coding technologies," Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 22(8), 734-748 (2011).
7. ISO, "JCT-VC AHG report: HM subjective quality investigation (AHG22)," Tech. Rep. M23863, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, San José, USA (February 2012).
8. ISO, "[AHG8] Objective and subjective evaluation of HM5.0," Tech. Rep. M22988, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, San José, USA (February 2012).
9. ITU-R, "P.910: Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications," Tech. Rep. P.910, ITU-R (1992).
10. ITU-R, "BT.500-11: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures," Tech. Rep. BT.500-11, ITU-R (2002).
11. ITU-T, "Objective perceptual assessment of video quality: Full reference television." ITU-T Telecommunication Standardization Bureau (2004).
12. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G., [Statistical Methods], Iowa State University, Press (1989).
13. Bjontegaard, G., "Improvements of the BD-PSNR model," Tech. Rep. VCEG-AI11, ITU-T SG16/Q6, Berlin, Germany (July 2008).