Multidimensional contexts for data quality assessment

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 866, Issue , 2012, Pages 196-209

  Malaki, Aida ^a   Bertossi, Leopoldo ^a   Rizzolo, Flavio ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; CONTEXT DEPENDENT; DATA QUALITY; DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT; DESCRIPTION LOGIC; EXTERNAL SYSTEMS; MULTIDIMENSIONAL CONTEXT; MULTIDIMENSIONAL DATA; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; SCHEMA MAPPINGS;

DATA DESCRIPTION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; METADATA;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 84872308101     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Arenas, M., Barcelo, P., Libkin, L. and Murlak, F. Relational and XML Data Exchange. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2010.
2. Artale, A., Calvanese, D., Kontchakov, R. and Zakharyaschev, M. The DL-Lite Family and Relations. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 36, 2009, pp. 1-69.
3. Batini, C. and Scannapieco, M. Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer, 2006.
4. Bernstein, Ph. and Melnik, S. Model Management 2.0: Manipulating Richer Mappings. Proc. SIGMOD 2007, pp. 1-12.
5. Bertossi, L. and Bravo, L. Consistent Query Answers in Virtual Data Integration Systems. In Inconsistency Tolerance, Springer LNCS 3300, 2004, pp. 42-83.
6. Bertossi, L., Rizzolo, F. and Lei, J. Data Quality is Context Dependent. Proc. WS. Enabling Real-Time Business Intelligence (BIRTE'10), Springer LNBIP 48, 2011, pp. 52-67.
7. Bertossi, L., Rizzolo, F. Contexts and Data Quality Assessment. Journal subm., Feb. 2012.
8. Bolchini, C., Curino, C., Quintarelli, E., Schreiber, F. and Tanca, L. A Data-Oriented Survey of Context Models. SIGMOD Record, 2007, 36(4):19-26.
9. Bolchini, C., Curino, C., Quintarelli, E., Schreiber, F. and Tanca, L. Context Information for Knowledge Reshaping. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol, 2009, 5(1):88-103.
10. C. Bolchini, C. Curino, G. Orsi, E. Quintarelli, R. Rossato, F. A. Schreiber, and L. Tanca. And What Can Context Do for Data? Commun. ACM, 52(11):136-140, 2009.
11. Cali, A., Gottlob, G. and Lukasiewicz, T. Datalog Extensions for Tractable Query Answering over Ontologies. In Semantic Web Information Management, R. De Virgilio, F. Giunchiglia, L. Tanda (eds.), Springer, 2010, pp. 249-279.
12. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M. and Rosati, R. Tractable Reasoning and Efficient Query Answering in Description Logics: The DL-Lite Family. J. Autom. Reasoning, 2007, 39(3):385-429.
13. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R. and Ruzzi, M. Using OWL in Data Integration. In Semantic Web Information Management, R. De Virgilio, F. Giunchiglia, L. Tanda (eds.), Springer, 2010, pp. 397-424.
14. Coutaz, J., Crowley, J.L., Dobso, S. and Garlan, D. Context Is Key. Commun. of ACM, 2009, 48(3):49-53.
15. Franconi, E. and E.Sattler. A DataWarehouse Conceptual Data Model for Multidimensional Aggregation. Proc. DMDW 1999, CEUR WS Proc., Vol. 19.
16. Franconi, E. and Sattler, E. A Data Warehouse Conceptual Data Model For Multidimensional Aggregation: A Preliminary Report. AI*IA Notizie, 1999, 1:9-21.
17. Giunchiglia, F. Contextual Reasoning. Proc. IJCAI-WS on Using Knowledge in its Context, 1993, pp. 39-49.
18. Ghidini, C. and Giunchiglia, F. Local Models Semantics, or Contextual Reasoning = Locality + Compatibility. Artificial Intelligence, 2001, 127:221-259.
19. Horrocks, I. and Sattler, U. A Description Logic with Transitive and Inverse Roles and Role Hierarchies. Journal of Logic and Computation, 1999, 9(3):385-410.
20. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U. and Tobies, S. Practical Reasoning for Very Expressive Description Logics. J. of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic, 2000, 8(3):239-264.
21. Hurtado, C.A., Gutierrez, C., and Mendelzon, A.O. Capturing Summarizability with Integrity Constraints in OLAP. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 30(3). (2005) 854-886
22. Jiang, L., Borgida, A. and Mylopoulos, J. Towards a Compositional Semantic Account of Data Quality Attributes. Proc. ER 2008, Springer LNCS 5231, pp. 55-68.
23. Lenzerini, M. Data Integration: A Theoretical Perspective. Proc. PODS 2002, pp. 233-246.
24. McCarthy, J. Notes on Formalizing Context. Proc. IJCAI 1993, pp. 555-562.
25. Martinenghi, D. and Torlone, R. Querying Context-Aware Databases. Proc. FQAS 2009, pp. 76-87.
26. Martinenghi, D. and Torlone, R. Querying Databases with Taxonomies. Proc. ER 2010, pp. 377-390.
27. Poggi, A., Lembo, D., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M. and Rosati, R. Linking Data to Ontologies. J. on Data Semantics, 2008, 10:133-173.
28. U. Sattler. Description Logics for the Representation of Aggregated Objects. In W.Horn, editor, Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 239-243. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2000.
29. Wang, R. and Strong, D. Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. J. Management and Information Systems, 1996, 12(4):5-33.