Rehabilitation Robotics

Handbook of Clinical Neurology

Volumn 110, Issue , 2013, Pages 283-294

  Krebs, H I ^a,b   Volpe, B T ^c  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872294728     PISSN: 00729752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00023-X     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Aisen M.L., Krebs H.I., Hogan N., et al. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997, 54:443-446.
2. American Heart Association Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2010 update. Circulation 2010, 121:e46-e215.
3. Brashear A., Gordon M.F., Elovi E., et al. Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke. N Engl J Med 2002, 347:395-400.
4. Butler P., Major R., Patrick J. The technique of reciprocal walking using the hip guidance orthosis (HGO) with crutches. Prosthet Orthot Int 1984, 8:33-38.
5. Duncan P.W., Bode R.K., Min Lai S. Analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:950-963.
6. Ferguson K.A., Polando G., Kobetic R., et al. Walking with a hybrid orthosis system. Spinal Cord 1999, 37:800-804.
7. Ferraro M., Palazzolo J.J., Krol J., et al. Robot aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology 2003, 61:1604-1607.
8. Fugl-Meyer A.R., Jaasko L., Leyman I., et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975, 7:13-31.
9. Goldfarb M., Durfee W.K. Design of a controlled-brake orthosis for FES-aided gait. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1996, 4:13-24.
10. Goldfarb M., Korkowski K., Harrold B., et al. Preliminary evaluation of a controlled-brake orthosis for FES-aided gait. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003, 11:241-248.
11. Greene P.J., Granat M.H. A knee and ankle flexing hybrid orthosis for paraplegic ambulation. Med Eng Phys 2003, 25:539-545.
12. Hallett M. Plasticity in the human motor system. Neuroscientist 1999, 5:324-332.
13. Hidler J., Nichols D., Pelliccio M., et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:5-13.
14. Hirokawa S., Grimm M., Le T., et al. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation of the thigh muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990, 71:687-694.
15. Hornby T.G., Campbell D.F., Kahn J.H., et al. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke 2008, 39:1786-1792.
16. IEEE Special Issue: 50 Years of Robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 2010, 17(3).
17. Isakov E., Douglas R., Berns P. Ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and functional electrical stimulation. Paraplegia 1992, 30:239-245.
18. Jefferson R., Whittle M. Performance of three walking orthoses for the paralysed: a case study using gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990, 14:103-110.
19. Jenkins W.M., Merzenich M.M. Reorganization of neurocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. Prog Brain Res 1987, 71:249-266.
20. Jorgensen H.S., Nakayama H., Raaschou H.O., et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995, 76:406-412.
21. Krebs H.I., Hogan N., Aisen M.L., et al. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998, 6:75-87.
22. Krebs H.I., Volpe B.T., Aisen M.L., et al. Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neurorehabilitation. VA J Rehab Res Dev 2000, 37:639-652.
23. Krebs H.I., Hogan N., Durfee W., et al. Rehabilitation robotics, orthotics, and prosthetics. Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation, Vol. II 2006, 165-181. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. M.E. Selzer, S. Clarke, L.G. Cohen, P.W. Duncan, F.H. Gage (Eds.).
24. Krebs D., Levy-Tzedek F., Rykman Z., et al. Paradigm shift: therapeutic robotics. IEEE EMB Magazine 2008, 27:61-70.
25. Kwakkel G., Kollen B.J., Krebs H.I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:111-121.
26. Lo A.C., Guarino P.D., Richards L.G., et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1772-1783.
27. Major R., Stallard J., Rose G. The dynamics of walking using the hip guidance orthosis (HGO) with crutches. Prosthet Orthot Int 1981, 5:19-22.
28. Marsolais E.B., Kobetic R., Polando G., et al. The Case Western Reserve University hybrid gait orthosis. J Spinal Cord Med 2000, 23:100-108.
29. McClelland M., Andrews B., Patrick J., et al. Augmentation of the Oswestry Parawalker orthosis by means of surface electrical stimulation: gait analysis of three patients. Paraplegia 1987, 25:32-38.
30. Mehrholz J., Werner C., Kugler J., et al. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, 4: CD006185.
31. Miller E.L., Murray L., Richards L., et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010, 41:2402-2448.
32. Miller P. Orthoses for the pelvic and hip region. Orthotics in Functional Rehabilitation of the Lower Limb 1997, 15-30. Saunders, Philadelphia. D. Nawoczenski, M. Epler (Eds.).
33. Nakayama H., Jorgensen H.S., Raaschou H.O., et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:394-398.
34. National Science Foundation (2010). Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation. White Paper on Neuro-Robotics: Mind, Machines, and Motor Control. http://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?org=EFRI.
35. Nef T., Mihelj M., Riener R. ARMin: a robot for patient-cooperative arm therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007, 45:887-900.
36. Nene A., Jennings S. Hybrid paraplegic locomotion with the Parawalker using intramuscular stimulation: a single subject study. Paraplegia 1989, 27:125-132.
37. Petrofsky J., Smith J. Physiologic costs of computer-controlled walking in persons with paraplegia using a reciprocating-gait orthosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991, 72:890-896.
38. Popovic D. Dynamics of the self-fitting modular orthosis. IEEE Trans Robotics Automat 1990, 6:200-207.
39. Popovic D., Tomovic R., Schwirtlich L. Hybrid assistive system: the motor neuroprosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989, 36:729-737.
40. Popovic D., Schwirtlich L., Radosavljevic S. Powered hybrid assistive system. Advances in External Control of Human Extremities 1990, 177-186. Nauka, Belgrade. D. Popovic (Ed.).
41. Riener R., Lunenburger L., Jezernik S., et al. Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005, 13:380-394.
42. Solomonow M., Baratta R., Hirokawa S., et al. The RGO generation II: muscle stimulation powered orthosis as a practical walking system for thoracic paraplegics. Orthopedics 1989, 12:1309-1315.
43. Solomonow M., Aguilar E., Reisin E., et al. Reciprocating gait orthosis powered with electrical muscle stimulation (RGO II). Part I: performance evaluation of 70 paraplegic patients. Orthopedics 1997, 20:315-324.
44. Stallard J., Major R., Patrick J. A review of the fundamental design problems of providing ambulation for paraplegic patients. Paraplegia 1989, 27:70-75.
45. Stein J., Narendran K., McBean J., et al. Electromyography-controlled exoskeletal upper-limb-powered orthosis for exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 86.
46. Tomovic R., Vukobrativic M., Vodovnik L. Hybrid actuators for orthotic systems: hybrid assistive systems. Advances in External Control of Human Extremities (ed, Tomovic, R.) 1973, Vol. IV:73-80.
47. United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. The Office of Quality and Performance, VA, Washington, DC & Quality Management Division, United States Army MEDCOM (Version 3.0) Full guideline available at:. http://www.qmo.amedd.army.mil.
48. US Congressional Robotics Caucus (2009). A Roadmap for Robotics: From Internet to Robotics. Available: http://www.us-robotics.us/reports/CCC%20Report.pdf.
49. Volpe B.T., Krebs H.I., Hogan N., et al. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology 1999, 53:1874-1876.
50. Volpe B.T., Krebs H.I., Hogan N., et al. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot aided sensorymotor stimulation. Neurology 2000, 54:1938-1944.
51. Volpe B.T., Krebs H.I., Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option?. Curr Opin Neurol 2001, 14:745-752.
52. Volpe B.T., Lynch D., Ferraro M., et al. Intensive sensorimotor arm training improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008, 22:305-310.
53. Volpe B.T., Huerta P.T., Zipse J., et al. Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch Neurol 2009, 66:1086-1090.
54. Weber D.J., Skidmore E.R., Niyonkuru C., et al. Cyclic functional electrical stimulation does not enhance gains in hand grasp function when used as an adjunct to onabotulinumtoxina and task practice therapy: a single-blind, randomized controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010, 91:679-686.
55. Whittle M., Cochrane G., Chase A., et al. A comparative trial of two walking systems for paralysed people. Paraplegia 1991, 29:97-102.
56. Wolf S.L., Lecraw D.E., Barton L.A., et al. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989, 104:125-132.
57. Yang L., Granat M.H., Paul J.P., et al. Further development of hybrid functional electrical stimulation orthoses. Artif Organs 1997, 21:183-187.