Intermediate-term prognostic value of reversible perfusion deficit diagnosed by adenosine CMR: A prospective follow-up study in a consecutive patient population

JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 56-63

  Buckert, Dominik ^a   Dewes, Patricia ^a   Walcher, Thomas ^a   Rottbauer, Wolfgang ^a   Bernhardt, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

cardiac magnetic resonance; long term; outcome; reversible perfusion deficit

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SMOKING; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; WHOLE BODY CT;

ADENOSINE; AGED; ANGINA, STABLE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY CIRCULATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84872294254     PISSN: 1936878X     EISSN: 18767591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. S.B. King III, S.C. Smith Jr, J.W. Hirshfeld Jr 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines J Am Coll Cardiol 51 2008 172 209
2. G.A. Lin, R.A. Dudley, F.L. Lucas, D.J. Malenka, E. Vittinghoff, R.F. Redberg Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention JAMA 300 2008 1765 1773
3. W.J. Manning, D.J. Atkinson, W. Grossman, S. Paulin, R.R. Edelman First-pass nuclear magnetic resonance imaging studies using gadolinium-DTPA in patients with coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 18 1991 959 965
4. J. Schwitter, D. Nanz, S. Kneifel Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography Circulation 103 2001 2230 2235
5. P. Bernhardt, B. Levenson, A. Albrecht, T. Engels, O. Strohm Detection of cardiac small vessel disease by adenosine-stress magnetic resonance Int J Cardiol 121 2007 261 266
6. E. Nagel, C. Klein, I. Paetsch Magnetic resonance measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease Circulation 108 2003 432 437
7. S.D. Wolff, J. Schwitter, R. Coulden Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study Circulation 110 2004 732 737
8. K.R. Nandalur, B.A. Dwamena, A.F. Choudhri, M.R. Nandalur, R.C. Carlos Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 50 2007 1343 1353
9. P. Bernhardt, J. Spiess, B. Levenson Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2 2009 1292 1300
10. C. Jahnke, E. Nagel, R. Gebker Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging Circulation 115 2007 1769 1776
11. K. Steel, R. Broderick, V. Gandla Complementary prognostic values of stress myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging by suspected coronary artery disease Circulation 120 2009 1390 1400
12. G. Pilz, A. Jeske, M. Klos Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Am J Cardiol 101 2008 1408 1412
13. S. Lerakis, D.S. McLean, A.V. Anadiotis Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with low-risk chest pain J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11 2009 37
14. W.P. Ingkanisorn, R.Y. Kwong, N.S. Bohme Prognostic of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2006 1427 1432
15. S.E. Bingham, R. Hachamovitch Incremental prognostic significance of combined cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, adenosine stress perfusion, delayed enhancement, and left ventricular function over preimaging information for the prediction of adverse events Circulation 123 2011 1509 1518
16. R.J. Gibbons, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina) J Am Coll Cardiol 33 1999 2092 2197
17. M.D. Cerqueira, N.J. Weissman, V. Dilsizian Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association Circulation 105 2002 539 542
18. R.M. Lang, M. Bierig, R.B. Devereux Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report of the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18 2005 1440 1463
19. E.J. Topol, S.E. Nissen Our preoccupation with luminology: the dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease Circulation 92 1995 2333 2342
20. K.A. Fox COURAGE to change practice? Revascularisation in patients with stable coronary artery disease Heart 95 2009 689 692
21. K.E. Fleischmann, M.G. Hunink, K.M. Kuntz, P.S. Douglas Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance JAMA 280 1998 913 920