Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A prospective randomized controlled study

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 257, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 214-218

  Lee, Won Suk ^a   Choi, Sang Tae ^a   Lee, Jung Nam ^a   Kim, Keon Kug ^a   Park, Yeon Ho ^a   Lee, Woon Kee ^a   Baek, Jeong Heum ^a   Lee, Tae Hoon ^a  

^a Gachon University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

appendectomy; laparoscope; single port

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ABDOMINAL BLEEDING; ABDOMINAL INFECTION; ACUTE APPENDICITIS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; APPENDECTOMY; COLITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY; DELIRIUM; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; ILEUS; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; INGUINAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORCHITIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SHORT FORM 36; SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY; SURGICAL PATIENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND COMPLICATION;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDICITIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872292077     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bde4     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:910-925.
2. Lee JH, Park YS, Choi JS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea: national registry data. J Epidemiol. 2010;20:97-105.
3. Noudeh YJ, Sadigh N, Ahmadnia AY. Epidemiologic features, seasonal variations and false positive rate of acute appendicitis in Shahr-e-Rey, Tehran. Int J Surg. 2007;5:95-98.
4. McBurney C IV. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894;20:38-43.
5. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15:59-64.
6. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg. 2004;239:43-52.
7. Ates O, Hakguder G, Olguner M, et al. Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy conducted intracorporeally with the aid of a transabdominal sling suture. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:1071-1074.
8. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, et al. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:458-464.
9. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, et al. Transumbilical endoscopic appendectomy in humans: on the road to NOTES: a prospective study. J La-paroendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18:579-582.
10. Voitk AJ, Tsao SG. The umbilicus in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:878-881.
11. Chiu CG, Nguyen NH, Bloom SW. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: an initial experience using a novel technique. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1153-1159.
12. Cho MS, Min BS, Hong YK, et al. Single-site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison of short-term operative outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:36-40.
13. Chouillard E, Dache A, Torcivia A, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1861-1865.
14. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Nehme J, et al. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2567-2574.
15. Lee J, Baek J, Kim W. Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with three-port appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:100-103.
16. Lee YS, Kim JH, Moon EJ, et al. Comparative study on surgical outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:493-496.
17. Raakow R, Jacob DA. Initial experience in laparoscopic single-port appendectomy: a pilot study. Dig Surg. 2011;28:74-79.
18. Rehman H, Rao AM, Ahmed I. Single incision versus conventional multi-incision appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;7:CD009022.
19. Yu J, Wang YN, Hu YF, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy performed above the pubic symphysis-A new scarless approach. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011;20:18-21.
20. St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254:586-590.
21. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005;242:439-448; discussion 448-450.
22. Kim HJ, Lee JI, Lee YS, et al. Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2765-2769.
23. Garey CL, Laituri CA, Ostlie DJ, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery in children: initial single-center experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:904-907.
24. Lee SY, Lee HM, Hsieh CS, et al. Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a reliable one-port procedure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1115-1120.
25. Vettoretto N, Mandala V. Single port laparoscopic appendectomy: are we pursuing real advantages? World J Emerg Surg. 2011;6:25.
26. Lee JA, Sung KY, Lee JH, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy with a single incision in a single institute. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26:260-264.
27. Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM, et al. Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies. Am Surg. 2000;66:548-554.
28. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg En-dosc. 2010;24:1842-1848.
29. Ma J, Cassera MA, Spaun GO, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic chole-cystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254:22-27.