Erratum to Hydrophobic modification of cellulose nanocrystal via covalently grafting of castor oil(Cellulose, (2013), 20, (179-190), 10.1007/s10570-012-9795-0);Hydrophobic modification of cellulose nanocrystal via covalently grafting of castor oil

Cellulose

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 179-190

  Shang, Wulin ^a   Huang, Jin ^a   Luo, Huan ^b   Chang, Peter R ^c   Feng, Jiwen ^b   Xie, Guangyong ^d  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^c AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^d SOUTH CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOR NATIONALITIES   (China)

Author keywords

Castor oil; Cellulose nanocrystal; Grafting; Hydrophobicity

Indexed keywords

ASPECT RATIO; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS; CONTACT ANGLE; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; HYDROPHOBICITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; VEGETABLE OILS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

BIONANOCOMPOSITES; CASTOR OIL; CHEMICAL GRAFTING; CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE; HYDROPHOBIC MODIFICATION; LARGE ASPECT RATIO; OPTIMIZED PERFORMANCE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROGRAPH;

GRAFTING (CHEMICAL);

CASTOR OIL; CELLULOSE WHISKERS; CONTACT ANGLE; COPOLYMERIZATION; FOURIER ANALYSIS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; VEGETABLE OIL; WATER REPELLENCE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84872288070     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0083-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Atalla RH, Gast JC, Sindorf DW, Bartuska VJ, Maciel GE (1980) Carbon-13 NMR spectra of cellulose polymorphs. J Am Chem Soc 102: 3249-3251. doi: 10. 1021/ja00529a063.
2. Bondeson D, Oksman K (2007) Polylactic acid/cellulose whisker nanocomposites modified by polyvinyl alcohol. Comp Part A-Appl S 38: 2486-2492. doi: 10. 1016/j. compositesa. 2007. 08. 001.
3. Buschle-Diller G, Zeronian SH (1992) Enhancing the reactivity and strength of cotton fibers. J App Poly Sci 45: 967-979. doi: 10. 1002/app. 1992. 070450604.
4. Butun S, Ince FG, Erdugan H, Sahiner N (2011) One-step fabrication of biocompatible carboxymethyl cellulose polymeric particles for drug delivery systems. Carbohyd Polym 86: 636-643. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2011. 05. 001.
5. Cao X, Habibi Y, Lucia L (2009) One-pot polymerization surface grafting, and processing of waterborne polyurethane-cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 19: 7137-7145. doi: 10. 1039/B910517D.
6. Capadona J, Shanmuganathan K, Tyler D, Rowan S, Weder C (2008) Stimuli-responsive polymer nanocomposites inspired by the sea cucumber dermis. Science 319: 1370-1374. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1153307.
7. Chen G, Dufresne A, Huang J, Chang P (2009) A novel thermoformable bionanocomposite based on cellulose nanocrystal-graft-poly(ε-caprolactone). Macromol Mate Eng 294: 59-67. doi: 10. 1002/mame. 200800261.
8. Chiappone A, Nair J, Gerbaldi C, Jabbour L, Bongiovanni R, Zeno E, Beneventi D, Penazzi N (2011) Microfibrillated cellulose as reinforcement for Li-ion battery polymer electrolytes with excellent mechanical stability. J Power Sources 196: 10280-10288. doi: 10. 1016/j. jpowsour. 2011. 07. 015.
9. Cho M, Park B (2011) Tensile and thermal properties of nanocellulose-reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 17: 36-40. doi: 10. 1016/j. jiec. 2010. 10. 006.
10. Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos N et al (2001) Review current international research into cellulose fibres and composites. J Mater Sci 36: 2107-2131. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1017512029696.
11. Favier V, Chanzy H, Cavaille J (1995) Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers. Macromolecules 28: 6365-6367. doi: 10. 1021/ma00122a053.
12. García-González C, Alnaief M, Smirnova I (2011) Polysaccharide-based aerogels-Promising biodegradable carriers for drug delivery systems. Carbohyd Polym 86: 1425-1438. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2011. 06. 066.
13. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110: 3479-3500. doi: 10. 1021/cr900339w.
14. Labet M, Thielemans W, Dufresne A (2007) Polymer grafting onto starch nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 8: 2916-2927. doi: 10. 1021/bm700468f.
15. Lin N, Chen G, Huang J, Dufresne A, Chang R (2009) Effects of polymer-grafted natural nanocrystals on the structure and mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid): a case of cellulose whisker-graft-polycaprolactone. J Appl Polym Sci 113: 3417-3425. doi: 10. 1002/app. 30308.
16. Lin N, Huang J, Chang R, Feng J, Yu J (2011) Surface acetylation of cellulose nanocrystal and its reinforcing function in poly(lactic acid). Carbohyd Polym 83: 1834-1842. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2010. 10. 047.
17. Lin N, Huang J, Duresne A (2012) Preparation, properties and applications of polysaccharide nanocrystals in advanced functional nanomaterials: a review. Nanoscale 4: 3274-3294. doi: 10. 1039/C2NR30260H.
18. Ljungberg N, Cavaille J, Heux L (2006) Nanocomposties of isotactic polypropylene reinforced with rod-like cellulose whiskers. Polymer 47: 6285-6292. doi: 10. 1016/j. polymer. 2006. 07. 013.
19. Lu Y, Weng L, Cao X (2006) Morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of ramie crystallites-reinforced plasticized starch biocomposites. Carbohyd Polym 63: 198-204. doi: 10. 1016/j. carbpol. 2005. 08. 027.
20. Ly EB, Bras J, Sadocco P, Belgacem MN, Dufresne A, Thielemans W (2010) Surface functionalization of cellulose by grafting oligoether chains. Mater Chem Phys 120: 438-445. doi: 10. 1016/j. matchemphys. 2009. 11. 032.
21. Owens DK, Wendt RC (1969) Estimation of the surface free energy of polymer. J Appl Polymer Sci 13: 1741-1747. doi: 10. 1002/app. 1969. 070130815.
22. Paquet O, Krouit M, Bras J, Thielemans W, Belgacem MN (2010) Surface modification of cellulose by PCL grafts. Acta Mater 58: 792-801. doi: 10. 1016/j. actamat. 2009. 09. 057.
23. Pei A, Malho J, Ruokolainen J, Zhou Q, Berglund L (2011) Strong nanocomposite reinforcement effects in polyurethane elastomer with low volume fraction of cellulose nanocrystals. Macromolecules 44: 4422-4427. doi: 10. 1021/ma200318k.
24. Peng B, Dhar N, Liu H, Tam K (2011) Chemistry and applications of nanocrystalline cellulose and its derivatives: a nanotechnology perspective. The Can J Chem Eng 89: 1191-1206. doi: 10. 1002/cjce. 20554.
25. Roy D, Semsarilar M, Guthrie JT, Perrier S (2009) Cellulose modification by polymer grafting: a review. Chem Soc Rev 38: 2046-2064. doi: 10. 1039/b808639g.
26. Shanmuganathan K, Capadona J, Rowan S, Weder C (2010) Biomimetic mechanically adaptive nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 35: 212-222. doi: 10. 1016/j. progpolymsci. 2009. 10. 005.
27. Shopsowitz K, Qi H, Hamad WY, MacLachlan MJ (2010) Free-standing mesoporous silica films with tunable chiral nematic structures. Nature 468: 422-425. doi: 10. 1038/nature09540.
28. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2009) Cellulose whiskers versus microfibrils: influence of the nature of nanoparticle and its surface functionalization on the thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 10: 425-432. doi: 10. 1021/bm801193d.
29. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) New process of chemical grafting of cellulose nanoparticles with a long chain isocyanate. Langmuir 26: 402-411. doi: 10. 1021/la9028595.
30. Supova M, Martynkova GS, Barabaszova K (2011) Effect of nanofillers dispersion in polymer matrices: a review. Sci Adv Mater 3: 1-25. doi: 10. 1166/sam. 2011. 1136.
31. I. Biomacromolecules 5: 1385-1391. doi: 10. 1021/bm035357.
32. Wang Y, Cao X, Zhang L (2006) Effects of cellulose whiskers on properties of soy protein thermoplastics. Macromol Biosci 6: 524-531. doi: 10. 1002/mabi. 200600034.
33. Williamson K, Masters KM (1994) Macroscale and microscale organic experiments, 2nd edn. Lexington, Mass, DC, p 40.
34. Zhang X, Huang J, Chang P, Li J, Chen Y, Wang D, Yu J, Chen J (2010) Structure and properties of polysaccharide nanocrystal-doped supramolecular hydrogels based on cyclodextrin inclusion. Polymer 51: 4398-4407. doi: 10. 1016/j. polymer. 2010. 07. 025.