Emergency research: Using exception from informed consent, evaluation of community consultations

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 98-103

  Govindarajan, Prasanth ^a   Dickert, Neal W ^b   Meeker, Michele ^c   De Souza, Natalie ^a   Harney, Deneil ^d   Hemphill, Claude J ^c   Pentz, Rebecca ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMMUNITY; COMMUNITY CARE; COMMUNITY CONSULTATION; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL ILLNESS; EMERGENCY CARE; EPILEPTIC STATE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRUST;

COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84872280470     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12039     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Department of Health and Human Services/U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Protection of Human Subjects: Informed Consent and Waiver of Informed Consent Requirements in Certain Emergency Research; Final Rules. 21 CFR part 50.24. Federal Registrar. 1996; 61: 51497-531.
2. Department of Health and Human Resources/U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors. Exception from Informed Consent Requirements for Emergency Research. Draft Guidance, 2006. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ ohrms/dockets/98fr/06d-0331-gdl0001.pdf. Accessed Jul 13, 2012.
3. Richardson LD, Quest TE, Birnbaum S,. Communicating with communities about emergency research. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 1064-70.
4. Silbergleit R, Lowenstein D, Durkalski V, Conwit R,; Neurological Emergency Treatment Trials (NETT) Investigators. RAMPART (Rapid anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial): a double-blind randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of intramuscular midazolam versus intravenous lorazepam in the prehospital treatment of status epilepticus by paramedics. Epilepsia. 2011; 52 (Suppl 8): 45-7.
5. Hall MA, Camacho F, Lawlor JS, Depuy V, Sugarman J, Weinfurt K,. Measuring trust in medical researchers. Med Care. 2006; 44: 1048-53.
6. Majority Opinion Research. Research Tools and Techniques. Available at: http://majorityopinionresearch.com/about/tools/tools.htm. Accessed Jul 13, 2012.
7. Bulger EM, Schmidt TA, Cook AJ, et al. The random dialing survey as a tool for community consultation for research involving the emergency medicine exception from informed consent. Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 53: 341-50.
8. Contant C, McCullough LB, Mangus L, Robertson C, Valadka A, Brody B,. Community consultation in emergency research. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34: 2049-52.
9. Biros MH, Sargent C, Miller K,. Community attitudes towards emergency research and exception from informed consent. Resuscitation. 2009; 80: 1382-7.
10. Longfield JN, Morris MJ, Moran KA, Kragh JF Jr, Wolf R, Baskin TW,. Community meetings for emergency research community consultation. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36: 731-6.
11. McClure KB, DeIorio NM, Gunnels MD, Ochsner MJ, Biros MH, Schmidt TA,. Attitudes of emergency department patients and visitors regarding emergency exception from informed consent in resuscitation research, community consultation, and public notification. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 352-9.