An empirical study of the state of the practice and acceptance of model-driven engineering in four industrial cases

Empirical Software Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 89-116

  Mohagheghi, Parastoo ^a,b   Gilani, Wasif ^c   Stefanescu, Alin ^d   Fernandez, Miguel A ^e  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c SAP Research Center   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITESTI   (Romania)

^e ERICSSON RESEARCH   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Empirical study; Model driven engineering; Qualitative study; Survey; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION LEVEL; ADOPTION PROCESS; EASE-OF-USE; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; ERROR PRONES; MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING; MULTIPLE SOURCE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; QUALITATIVE STUDY; STATE OF THE PRACTICE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

SOFTWARE DESIGN; SURVEYS;

DIGITAL STORAGE;

EID: 84872279471     PISSN: 13823256     EISSN: 15737616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-012-9196-x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Creswell JW (2002) Research design - qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage Publications
2. Davis F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3):318-339
3. Davis F, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982-1003
4. th International Symposium (Metrics'04), pp. 220-231
5. Evans A, Mohagheghi P, Fernández MA (2009) Experiences of developing a network modeling tool using the Eclipse environment. Proc. 5th European Conference on Model Driven Architecture Foundations and Applications (ECMFA'09), LNCS 5562, pp 301-312
6. France R, Rumpe B (2007) Model-driven development of complex software: a research roadmap. Int Conf Software Eng (ICSE'07), pp 37-54
7. Kirstan S, Zimmermann J (2010) Evaluating costs and benefits of model-based development of embedded software systems in the car industry - Results of a qualitative Case Study. Proc. ECMFA 2010 workshop C2M:EEMDD- from Code Centric to Model Centric: Evaluating the Effectiveness of MDD, pp. 18-29
8. MODELWARE (2006) Deliverable D5.3-1 Industrial ROI, assessment, and feedback- master document, revision 2.2.
9. Moe NB, Dybå T (2006) The use of an Electronic Process Guide in a medium-sized software development company. Software Process Improv Pract 11:21-34
10. Mohagheghi P, Dehlen V (2008) Where is the proof? A review of experiences from applying MDE in industry. Proc. 4th European Conference on Model Driven Architecture Foundations and Applications (ECMFA'08), LNCS 5095, pp. 432-443
11. Mohagheghi P, Fernández MA, Martell JA, Fritzsche M, Gilani W (2008) MDE adoption in industry: challenges and success criteria. Models in Software Engineering, Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2008, LNCS 5421, pp. 54-59
12. Mohagheghi P (2010) An approach for empirical evaluation of model-driven engineering in multiple dimensions. Proc. C2M:EEMDD 2010 workshop at ECMFA 2010- from Code Centric to Model Centric: Evaluating the Effectiveness of MDD, pp. 6-17
13. Riemenschneider CK, Hardgrave BC, Davis FD (2002) Explaining software developer acceptance of methodologies: a comparison of five theoretical models. IEEE Trans Software Eng 28(12):1135-1145
14. Staron M (2006) Adopting model driven software development in industry- a case study at two companies. Proc ACM/IEEE 9th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS/UML 2006), LNCS 4199:57-72
15. Walderhaug S, Mikalsen M, Benc I, Erlend S (2008) Factors affecting developers' use of MDSD in the healthcare domain: evaluation from the MPOWER project. Proc. From Code Centric to Model Centric Software Engineering: Practices, Implications and ROI. Workshop at European Conference on Model-Driven Architecture
16. Yin R.K (2002) Case study research - design and methods. Third edition, Sage publications