Predictive value of preoperative clinical examination for subacromial decompression in impingement syndrome

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 443-448

  Kappe, Thomas ^a   Knappe, Kevin ^a   Elsharkawi, Mohammed ^a   Reichel, Heiko ^a   Cakir, Balkan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical examination; Subacromial decompression; Subacromial impingement syndrome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROSCOPY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROSCOPY; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME;

EID: 84872269563     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2386-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Altchek DW, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL et al (1990) Arthroscopic acromioplasty. Technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1198–1207
2. Arcand MA, O’Rourke P, Zeman CA et al (2000) Revision surgery after failed subacromial decompression. Int Orthop 24:61–64
3. Bigliani LU, Levine WN (1997) Subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1854–1868
4. Boehm D, Wollmerstedt N, Doesch M et al (2004) Development of a questionnaire based on the Constant-Murley-Score for self-evaluation of shoulder function by patients. Unfallchirurg 107:397–402
5. Calis M, Akgun K, Birtane M et al (2000) Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 59:44–47
6. Connor PM, Yamaguchi K, Pollock RG et al (2000) Comparison of arthroscopic and open revision decompression for failed anterior acromioplasty. Orthopedics 23:549–554
7. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164
8. Dorrestijn O, Stevens M, Winters JC et al (2009) Conservative or surgical treatment for subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:652–660
9. Gerber C, Sebesta A (2000) Impingement of the deep surface of the subscapularis tendon and the reflection pulley on the anterosuperior glenoid rim: a preliminary report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:483–490
10. Guyette TM, Bae H, Warren RF et al (2002) Results of arthroscopic subacromial decompression in patients with subacromial impingement and glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:299–304
11. Gwilym SE, Oag HC, Tracey I et al (2011) Evidence that central sensitisation is present in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome and influences the outcome after surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:498–502
12. Hawkins RJ, Chris T, Bokor D et al (1989) Failed anterior acromioplasty. A review of 51 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:106–111
13. Hawkins RJ, Hobeika PE (1983) Impingement syndrome in the athletic shoulder. Clin Sports Med 2:391–405
14. Hawkins RJ, Kennedy JC (1980) Impingement syndrome in athletes. Am J Sports Med 8:151–158
15. Henn RF 3rd, Kang L, Tashjian RZ et al (2007) Patients’ preoperative expectations predict the outcome of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1913–1919
16. Holtby R, Razmjou H (2010) Impact of work-related compensation claims on surgical outcome of patients with rotator cuff related pathologies: a matched case-control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:452–460
17. Jia X, Ji JH, Pannirselvam V et al (2011) Does a positive neer impingement sign reflect rotator cuff contact with the acromion? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:813–818
18. Jobe FW, Moynes DR (1982) Delineation of diagnostic criteria and a rehabilitation program for rotator cuff injuries. Am J Sports Med 10:336–339
19. Johansson K, Ivarson S (2009) Intra- and interexaminer reliability of four manual shoulder maneuvers used to identify subacromial pain. Man Ther 14:231–239
20. Kirkley A, Alvarez C, Griffin S (2003) The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clin J Sport Med 13:84–92
21. Kirkley A, Litchfield RB, Jackowski DM et al (2002) The use of the impingement test as a predictor of outcome following subacromial decompression for rotator cuff tendinosis. Arthroscopy 18:8–15
22. Lim JT, Acornley A, Dodenhoff RM (2005) Recovery after arthroscopic subacromial decompression: prognostic value of the subacromial injection test. Arthroscopy 21:680–683
23. MacDonald PB, Clark P, Sutherland K (2000) An analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the Hawkins and Neer subacromial impingement signs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:299–301
24. Mair SD, Viola RW, Gill TJ et al (2004) Can the impingement test predict outcome after arthroscopic subacromial decompression? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:150–153
25. May S, Chance-Larsen K, Littlewood C et al (2010) Reliability of physical examination tests used in the assessment of patients with shoulder problems: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 96:179–190
26. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Doukas WC et al (2009) Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:1898–1903
27. Naredo E, Aguado P, De Miguel E et al (2002) Painful shoulder: comparison of physical examination and ultrasonographic findings. Ann Rheum Dis 61:132–136
28. Neer CS 2nd (1972) Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:41–50
29. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Wiley AM, Sattarian J (1990) Failed acromioplasty for impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:1070–1072
30. Oh JH, Kim SH, Kim KH et al (2010) Modified impingement test can predict the level of pain reduction after rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 38:1383–1388
31. Olsewski JM, Depew AD (1994) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression and rotator cuff debridement for stage II and stage III impingement. Arthroscopy 10:61–68
32. Park HB, Yokota A, Gill HS et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1446–1455
33. Patel VR, Singh D, Calvert PT et al (1999) Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: results and factors affecting outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:231–237
34. Seeger LL, Gold RH, Bassett LW et al (1988) Shoulder impingement syndrome: MR findings in 53 shoulders. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:343–347
35. Tucker S, Taylor NF, Green RA (2011) Anatomical validity of the Hawkins–Kennedy test—a pilot study. Man Ther 16:399–402
36. Valadie AL 3rd, Jobe CM, Pink MM et al (2000) Anatomy of provocative tests for impingement syndrome of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:36–46
37. Vitale MA, Arons RR, Hurwitz S et al (2010) The rising incidence of acromioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1842–1850