A review of bone growth stimulation for fracture treatment

Current Orthopaedic Practice

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 84-91

  Behrens, Steve B ^a   Deren, Matthew E ^a   Monchik, Keith O ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone growth stimulation; Delayed union; Electrical stimulation; Fracture; Non union

Indexed keywords

LITHIUM; PLACEBO;

ACUPUNCTURE; AMPUTATION; BONE GROWTH; BONE GROWTH STIMULATION; BONE GROWTH STIMULATOR; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CAPACITIVE CURRENT BONE GROWTH STIMULATOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMBINED MAGNETIC FIELD BONE GROWTH STIMULATOR; DIRECT CURRENT; DIRECT CURRENT BONE GROWTH STIMULATOR; ELECTRIC BATTERY; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC BONE STIMULATOR; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMUR FRACTURE; FRACTURE; FRACTURE EXTERNAL FIXATION; FRACTURE HEALING; FRACTURE NONUNION; FRACTURE TREATMENT; HUMAN; LOW INTENSITY PULSED ULTRASOUND BONE GROWTH STIMULATOR; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; OSTEOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TIBIA FRACTURE; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND THERAPY;

EID: 84872228266     PISSN: 19407041     EISSN: 19417551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BCO.0b013e3182793faa     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Ryaby JT. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 355(Suppl): S205-S215.
2. Medicare claims processing manual. In: Services CFMaM, ed. Billing Requirements for Special Services. Baltimore, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, United States Government; 2010.
3. Boyd HB. Symposium: Treatment of ununited fractures of the long bones; introduction. J Bone Joint Surg. 1965; 47-A: 167-168.
4. Connolly JF. Common avoidable problems in nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; 194: 226-235.
5. Heckman JD, Sarasohn-Kahn J. The economics of treating tibia fractures. The cost of delayed unions. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1997; 56: 63-72.
6. Benjamin P. A History of Electricity (The Intellectual Rise in Electricity) From Antiquity to the Days of Benjamin Franklin. New York: J. Wiley and Sons; 1898.
7. Kratzenstein CG. Abhandlung von dem Nutzen der Elek in der Arzneiwissenschaft. Halle, Germany: Gralath; 1744.
8. Boyer A. A Treatise in Surgical Diseases and the Operations Suited to Them. New York: T & J Swords; 1816.
9. Mott V. Two cases of ununited fractures successfully treated by Seton. Medical and Surgical Register 1 (part 2). 1820; 2: 375.
10. Lente FD. Cases of ununited fractures treated by electricity. NY J Med. 1850; 5: 317-320.
11. Garrett AC. Electro-physiology and Electro Therapeutics. Boston: Ticknor and Fields; 1861.
12. Wolff J. The Law of Bone Remodeling [in German]. Berlin: Springer; 1892.
13. Becker RO, Selden G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life. New York: Morrow; 1985.
14. Fukada E, Yasuda I. On the piezoelectric effect of bone. J Phys Soc Jpn. 1957; 12: 1158-1162.
15. Becker RO, Bassett CAL. Bone Biodynamics. New York: Little Brown; 1964.
16. Friedenberg ZB, Brighton CT. Bioelectric potentials in bone. J Bone Joint Surg. 1966; 48-A: 915-923.
17. Bassett CA, Pawluk RJ, Becker RO. Effects of electric currents on bone in vivo. Nature. 1964; 204: 652-654.
18. Shamos MH, Lavine LS. Piezoelectricity as a fundamental property of biological tissues. Nature. 1967; 213: 267-269.
19. Anderson JC, Eriksson C. Electrical properties of wet collagen. Nature. 1968; 218: 166-168.
20. Wang CJ, Chen HS, Chen CE, et al. Treatment of nonunions of long bone fractures with shock waves. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 387: 95-101.
21. Black J. Electrical Stimulation: its Role in Growth, Repair, and Remodeling of the Musculoskeletal System. New York: Praeger; 1987.
22. Barushka O, Yaakobi T, Oron U. Effect of low-energy laser (He-Ne) irradiation on the process of bone repair in the rat tibia. Bone. 1995; 16: 47-55.
23. Kenwright J, Goodship AE. Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 241: 36-47.
24. Mayr E, Frankel V, Rüter A. Ultrasound - an alternative healing method for nonunions? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000; 120: 1-8.
25. Gebauer D, Mayr E, Orthner E, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: effects on nonunions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005; 31: 1391-1402.
26. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003; 85-A: 1-3.
27. Toth JM, Seim HB III, Schwardt JD, et al. Direct current electrical stimulation increases the fusion rate of spinal fusion cages. Spine. 2000; 25: 2580-2587.
28. Aaron RK, Ciombor DM, Simon BJ. Treatment of nonunions with electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 419: 21-29.
29. Paterson DC, Lewis GN, Cass CA. Treatment of delayed union and nonunion with an implanted direct current stimulator. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; 148: 117-128.
30. Cain EL. Stimulating treatment. Orthop Tech Rev. 2002; 4: 4.
31. Nelson FR, Brighton CT, Ryaby J, et al. Use of physical forces in bone healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003; 11: 344-354.
32. Aaron RK, Steinberg ME. Electrical stimulation of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Semin Arthroplasty. 1991; 2: 214-221.
33. Bassett CA. Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutic uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989; 17: 451-529.
34. Brighton CT, Pollack SR. Treatment of recalcitrant non-union with a capacitively coupled electrical field. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985; 67-A: 577-585.
35. Brighton CT, Hozack WJ, Brager MD, et al. Fracture healing in the rabbit fibula when subjected to various capacitively coupled electrical fields. J Orthop Res. 1985; 3: 331-340.
36. Lorich DG, Brighton CT, Gupta R, et al. Biochemical pathway mediating the response of bone cells to capacitive coupling. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 350: 246-256.
37. Brighton CT, Wang W, Seldes R, et al. Signal transduction in electrically stimulated bone cells. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001; 83-A: 1514-1523.
38. Gross TS, Edwards JL, McLeod KJ, et al. Strain gradients correlate with sites of periosteal bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12: 982-988.
39. Rubin C, Bolander M, Ryaby JP, et al. The use of low-intensity ultrasound to accelerate the healing of fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001; 83-A: 259-270.
40. Tang CH, Yang RS, Huang TH, et al. Ultrasound stimulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression and increases bone formation through integrin, focal adhesion kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and Akt pathway in osteoblasts. Mol Pharmacol. 2006; 69: 2047-2057.
41. Unsworth J, Kaneez S, Harris S, et al. Pulsed low intensity ultrasound enhances mineralisation in preosteoblast cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007; 33: 1468-1474.
42. Baker KG, Robertson VJ, Duck FA. A review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects. Phys Ther. 2001; 81: 1351-1358.
43. Dyson M, Suckling J. Stimulation of tissue repair by ultrasound: a survey of the mechanisms involved. Physiotherapy. 1978; 64: 105-108.
44. Rawool NM, Goldberg BB, Forsberg F, et al. Power Doppler assessment of vascular changes during fracture treatment with low-intensity ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22: 145-153.
45. Welgus HG, Jeffrey JJ, Eisen AZ. Human skin fibroblast collagenase. Assessment of activation energy and deuterium isotope effect with collagenous substrates. J Biol Chem. 1981; 256: 9516-9521.
46. Khan Y, Laurencin CT. Fracture repair with ultrasound: clinical and cell-based evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008; 90-A(Suppl 1): 138-144.
47. Leung KS, Cheung WH, Zhang C, et al. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulates osteogenic activity of human periosteal cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 418: 253-259.
48. Li JK, Lin JC, Liu HC, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and electromagnetic field effects on osteoblast growth. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006; 32: 769-775.
49. Parvizi J, Parpura V, Greenleaf JF, et al. Calcium signaling is required for ultrasound-stimulated aggrecan synthesis by rat chondrocytes. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20: 51-57.
50. Friedenberg ZB, Zemsky LM, Pollis RP, et al. The response of non-traumatized bone to direct current. J Bone Joint Surg. 1974; 56-A: 1023-1030.
51. Brighton CT, Friedenberg ZB, Zemsky LM, et al. Direct-current stimulation of non-union and congenital pseudarthrosis. Exploration of its clinical application. J Bone Joint Surg. 1975; 57-A: 368-377.
52. Baranowski TJ Jr, Black J, Brighton CT, et al. Electrical osteogenesis by low direct current. J Orthop Res. 1983; 1: 120-128.
53. Hassler CR, Rybicki EF, Diegle RB, et al. Studies of enhanced bone healing via electrical stimuli. Comparative effectiveness of various parameters. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977; 124: 9-19.
54. Brighton CT, Black J, Friedenberg ZB, et al. A multicenter study of the treatment of non-union with constant direct current. J Bone Joint Surg. 1981; 63-A: 2-13.
55. Hughes MS, Anglen JO. The use of implantable bone stimulators in nonunion treatment. Orthopedics. 2010; 10: 151-157.
56. Esterhai JL Jr, Brighton CT, Heppenstall RB, et al. Nonunion of the humerus. Clinical, roentgenographic, scintigraphic, and response characteristics to treatment with constant direct current stimulation of osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 211: 228-234.
57. Heppenstall RB. Constant direct-current treatment for established nonunion of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; 178: 179-184.
58. Bora FW Jr, Osterman AL, Woodbury DF, et al. Treatment of nonunion of the scaphoid by direct current. Orthop Clin North Am. 1984; 15: 107-112.
59. Day L. Electrical stimulation in the treatment of ununited fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981; 161: 54-57.
60. Scott G, King JB. A prospective, double-blind trial of electrical capacitive coupling in the treatment of non-union of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994; 76-A: 820-826.
61. Zamora-Navas P, Borras Verdera A, Antelo Lorenzo R, et al. Electrical stimulation of bone nonunion with the presence of a gap. Acta Orthop Belg. 1995; 61: 169-176.
62. Benazzo F, Mosconi M, Beccarisi G, et al. Use of capacitive coupled electric fields in stress fractures in athletes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 310: 145-149.
63. Bassett CA, Pawluk RJ, Pilla AA. Acceleration of fracture repair by electromagnetic fields. A surgically noninvasive method. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974; 238: 242-262.
64. Bassett CA, Pilla AA, Pawluk RJ. A non-operative salvage of surgically-resistant pseudarthroses and non-unions by pulsing electromagnetic fields. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Resl Res. 1977; 124: 128-143.
65. Bassett CA, Mitchell SN, Gaston SR. Pulsing electromagnetic field treatment in ununited fractures and failed arthrodeses. JAMA. 1982; 247: 623-628.
66. Griffin XL, Costa ML, Parsons N, et al. Electromagnetic field stimulation for treating delayed union or non-union of long bone fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 4: CD008471.
67. Sharrard WJ. A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990; 72-B: 347-355.
68. Borsalino G, Bagnacani M, Bettati E, et al. Electrical stimulation of human femoral intertrochanteric osteotomies. Doubleblind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; 237: 256-263.
69. Barker AT. The design of a clinical electromagnetic bone stimulator. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1981; 2: 9-16.
70. Heckman JD, Ingram AJ, Loyd RD, et al. Nonunion treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981; 161: 58-66.
71. Gossling HR, Bernstein RA, Abbott J. Treatment of ununited tibial fractures: a comparison of surgery and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF). Orthopedics. 1992; 15: 711-719.
72. Meskens MW, Stuyck JA, Feys H, et al. Treatment of nonunion using pulsed electromagnetic fields: a retrospective followup study. Acta Orthop Belg. 1990; 56: 483-488.
73. Cebrián JL, Gallego P, Francés A, et al. Comparative study of the use of electromagnetic fields in patients with pseudoarthrosis of tibia treated by intramedullary nailing. Int Orthop. 2010; 34: 437-440.
74. Holmes GB Jr. Treatment of delayed unions and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal with pulsed electromagnetic fields. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15: 552-556.
75. Adams BD, Frykman GK, Taleisnik J. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion with casting and pulsed electromagnetic fields: a study continuation. J Hand Surg. 1992; 17: 910-914.
76. Colson DJ, Browett JP, Fiddian NJ, et al. Treatment of delayedand non-union of fractures using pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Biomed Eng. 1988; 10: 301-304.
77. Garland DE, Moses B, Salyer W. Long-term follow-up of fracture nonunions treated with PEMFs. Contemp Orthop. 1991; 22: 295-302.
78. Assiotis A, Sachinis NP, Chalidis BE. Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions A prospective clinical study and review of the literature. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012; 7: 24.
79. Linovitz RJ, Pathria M, Bernhardt M, et al. Combined magnetic fields accelerate and increase spine fusion: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study. Spine. 2002; 27: 1383-1389.
80. Snyder BM, Conley J, Koval KJ. Does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound reduce time to fracture healing? A meta-analysis. Am J Orthop. 2012; 41: E12-E19.
81. Busse JW, Bhandari M, Kulkarni AV, et al. The effect of lowintensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on time to fracture healing: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2002; 166: 437-441.
82. Mohtadi N. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy for fracture healing: a meta-analysis. Clin J Sport Med. 2003; 13: 127.
83. Bashardoust Tajali S, Houghton P, MacDermid JC, et al. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on fracture healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91: 349-367.
84. Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994; 76-A: 26-34.
85. Strauss E, Ryaby JP, McCabe JM. Treatment of Jones' fractures of the foot with adjunctive use of low-pulsed ultrasound stimulation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the International Society for Fracture Repair, Strasbourg. J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13: 310.
86. Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997; 79: 961-973.
87. Rue JP, Armstrong DW III, Frassica FJ, et al. The effect of pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of tibial stress fractures. Orthopedics. 2004; 27: 1192-1195.
88. Uchiyama Y, Nakamura Y, Mochida J, et al. Effect of lowintensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for delayed and nonunion stress fractures of the anterior mid-tibia in five athletes. Tokai J Exper Clin Med. 2007; 32: 121-125.
89. Leung KS, Lee WS, Tsui HF, et al. Complex tibial fracture outcomes following treatment with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004; 30: 389-395.
90. Lubbert PH, vander RijtRH, Hoorntje LE, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in fresh clavicle fractures: a multi-centre double blind randomised controlled trial. Injury. 2008; 39: 1444-1452.
91. Handolin L, Kiljunen V, Arnala I, et al. The effect of low intensity ultrasound and bioabsorbable self-reinforced poly-Llactide screw fixation on bone in lateral malleolar fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005; 125: 317-321.
92. Schofer MD, Block JE, Aigner J, et al. Improved healing response in delayed unions of the tibia with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: results of a randomized sham-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Dis. 2010; 11: 229.
93. Mayr E, Mockl C, Lenich A, et al. [Is low intensity ultrasound effective in treatment of disorders of fracture healing?]. Unfallchirurg. 2002; 105: 108-115.
94. Nolte PA, van der Krans A, Patka P, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of nonunions. J Trauma. 2001; 51: 693-702.
95. Hemery X, Ohl X, Saddiki R, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for non-union treatment: a 14-case series evaluation. Orthop Ttraumatol Surg Res. 2011; 97: 51-57.
96. Jingushi S, Mizuno K, Matsushita T, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for postoperative delayed union or nonunion of long bone fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2007; 12: 35-41.
97. Rutten S, Nolte PA, Guit GL, et al. Use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for posttraumatic nonunions of the tibia: a review of patients treated in the Netherlands. J Trauma. 2007; 62: 902-908.
98. Zorlu U, Tercan M, Ozyazgan I, et al. Comparative study of the effect of ultrasound and electrostimulation on bone healing in rats. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77: 427-432.
99. Brighton CT, Shaman P, Heppenstall RB, et al. Tibial nonunion treated with direct current, capacitive coupling, or bone graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 321: 223-234.