Automatic twitter topic summarization with speech acts

IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 649-658

  Zhang, Renxian ^a,b   Li, Wenjie ^b   Gao, Dehong ^a,b   Ouyang, You ^b,c  

^a The Hong Kong Polytechnic University   (Hong Kong)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c Miaozhen Systems   (China)

Author keywords

abstractive summarization; key word phrase extraction; speech act; Twitter

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER RECOGNITION; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); EXTRACTION; LINGUISTICS; ROUTERS; SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SPEECH; TEXT PROCESSING;

ABSTRACTIVE SUMMARIZATION; AUTOMATIC SUMMARIZATION; KEY WORDS; MULTI-DOCUMENT SUMMARIZATION; MULTICLASS CLASSIFICATION PROBLEMS; ROUND ROBIN ALGORITHMS; SPEECH ACTS; TWITTER;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 84872199207     PISSN: 15587916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TASL.2012.2229984     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. J. Austin, How to Do ThingsWithWords. Oxford, U.K.: OxfordUniv. Press, 1962.
2. J. Searle, P. Cole and J. Morgan, Eds., "Indirect speech acts," in Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic, 1975, vol. iii, pp. 59-82, Speech acts.
3. J. Searle and D. Vanderveken, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985.
4. H. Bunt, "Context and dialogue control," Think vol. 3, pp. 19-31, 1994.
5. A. Stolcke, K. Ries, N. Coccaro, E. Shriberg, R. Bates, D. Jurafsky, P. Taylor, R. Martin, C. Van Ess-Dykema, andM.Meteer, "Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech," Comput Linguist., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 339-373, 2000.
6. E. Shriberg, R. Bates, P. Taylor, A. Stolcke, D. Jurafsky, K. Ries, N. Coccaro, R. Martin, M. Meteer, and C. Van Ess-Dyykema, "Can prosody aid the automatic classification of dialog acts in conversational speech?," Lang. Speech (Spec. Iss. Prosody Conversat.), vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 439-487, 1998.
7. D. Jurafsky, E. Shriberg, and D. Biasca, "Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL labeling project coder's manual, draft 13," Univ. of Colorado Inst. of Cognitive Sci., Tech. Rep., 1997.
8. R. Dhillon, S. Bhagat, H. Carvey, and E. Shriberg, "Meeting recorder project: Dialog act labeling guide," Int. Comput. Sci. Inst., Berkeley, CA, Tech. Rep., 2004.
9. W. Cohen, V. Carvalho, and T. Mitchell, "Learning to classify email into 'speech acts'," in Proc. EMNLP-04, 2004, pp. 309-316.
10. D. Feng, E. Shaw, J.Kim, and E.H. Hovy, "Learning to detect conversation focus of threaded discussions," in Proc. HLT-NAACL-06, 2006, pp. 208-215.
11. R. Zhang, D. Gao, and W. Li, "What are tweeters doing: Recognizing speech acts in twitter," in Proc. AAAI-11 Workshop Analyzing Microtext, 2011.
12. A. Ritter, C. Cherry, and B. Dolan, "Unsupervised modeling of twitter conversations," in Proc. HLT-NAACL-10, 2010, pp. 172-180.
13. M. Jeong, C.-Y. Lin, and G. Lee, "Semi-supervised speech act recognition in emails and forums," in Proc. EMNLP-09, 2009, pp. 1250-1259.
14. D. Crystal, Language and the Internet, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006.
15. D. Crystal, Internet Linguistics. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2011.
16. M. Kaufmann and J. Kalita, "Syntactic normalization of twitter messages," in Proc. ICON-2010: 8th Int. Conf. Natural Lang. Process., 2010.
17. B. Han and T. Baldwin, "Lexical normalisation of short text messages: Makn sens a #twitter," in Proc. ACL-11, 2011, pp. 368-378.
18. K. Mckeown and D. R. Radev, "Generating summaries of multiple news articles," in Proc. 18th Annu. Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Develop. in Inf. Retrieval, 1995, pp. 74-82.
19. D. Radev, H. Jing, M. Sty, and D. Tam, "Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents," Inf. Process. Manage., vol. 40, pp. 919-938, 2004.
20. R. Mihalcea and P. Tarau, "TextRank: Bringing order into texts," in Proc. EMNLP-04, 2004, pp. 404-411.
21. X. Wan and J. Yang, "Multi-document summarization using clusterbased link analysis," in Proc. SIGIR-08, 2008, pp. 299-306.
22. B. Sharifi, M.-A. Hutton, and J. Kalita, "Summarizing microblogs automatically," in Proc. HLT/NAACL-10, 2010.
23. B. Sharifi, M.-A. Hutton, and J. Kalita, "Experiments in microblog summarization," in Proc. IEEE 2nd Int. Conf. Social Comput., 2010.
24. D. Inouye, Multiple post microblog summarization REU Research Final Rep., 2010.
25. G. Erkan and D. Radev, "LexRank: Graph-based Centrality as Salience in Text Summarization," J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 22, pp. 457-479, 2004. (Pubitemid 41525893)
26. F. Liu, Y. Liu, and F. Weng, "Why is 'SXSW' trending? Exploring multiple text sources for twitter topic summarization," in Proc. ACL Workshop Lang. in Social Media (LSM 2011), 2011, pp. 66-75.
27. E. Reiter and R. Dale, Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000.
28. K. Van Deemter and J. Odijk, "Context modelling and the generation of spoken discourse," Speech Commun., vol. 21, no. 1/2, pp. 101-121, 1997. (Pubitemid 127412289)
29. S. W. Mcroy, S. Channarukul, and S. S. Ali, "An augmented templatebased approach to text realization," Natural Lang. Eng., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 381-420, 2003.
30. H. Saggion and G. Lapalme, "Generating indicative-informative summaries with SumUM," Comput. Linguist., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 497-526, 2002.
31. G. Carenini and J. C. K. Cheung, "Extractive vs. NLG-based abstractive summarization of evaluative text: The effect of corpus controversiality," in Proc. ACL-08, 2008, pp. 33-40.
32. M. Kumar, D. Das, S. Agarwal, and A. Rudnicky, "Non-textual event summarization by applying machine learning to template-based language generation," in Proc. Workshop Lang. Generat. Summarisat. (UCNLG Sum 2009), 2009, pp. 67-71.
33. A. Wierzbicka, English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Orlando, FL: Academic, 1987.
34. S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani, "SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining," in Proc. 7th Conf. Int. Lang. Resources Eval., 2010.
35. T. Wilson and J. Wiebe, "Identifying opinionated sentences," in Proc. NAACL-03, 2003, pp. 33-34.
36. X. Zhao and J. Jiang, An empirical comparison of topics in Twitter and traditional media Singapore Manage. Univ. School of Inf. Syst., Singapore, Tech. Rep., 2011.
37. S. Brin and L. Page, "The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine," in Proc. 7th WWW Conf., 1998, pp. 107-117.
38. Z. Wu and G. Tseng, "Chinese text segmentation for text retrieval achievements and problems," JASIS, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 532-542, 1993.
39. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein, "The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries," in Proc. SIGIR-98, 1998, pp. 335-336.
40. K. Gimpel, N. Schneider, B. O'Connor, D. Das, D.Mills, J. Eisenstein, M. Heilman, D. Yogatama, J. Flanigan, and N. A. Smith, "Part-ofspeech tagging for twitter: Annotation, features, and experiments," in Proc. ACL-11, 2011.
41. A. Nenkova and L. Vanderwende, "The impact of frequency on summarization," Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2005-101, 2005.
42. C.-Y. Lin, "ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries," in Proc. ACL Workshop Text Summarizat. Branches, 2004, pp. 74-81.