Membrane tension homeostasis of epithelial cells through surface area regulation in response to osmotic stress

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research

Volumn 1833, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 712-722

  Pietuch, Anna ^a   Brückner, Bastian R ^a   Janshoff, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Epithelial cell; Membrane tension; Microvilli; Osmotic stress; Surface area regulation

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; HYPERTONIC SOLUTION; HYPOTONIC SOLUTION;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CAVEOLA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOCYTOSIS; EPITHELIUM CELL; HYPOOSMOTIC STRESS; MICROVILLUS; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; OSMOTIC STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TENSION;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; CELLS, CULTURED; DOGS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; HOMEOSTASIS; HYPERTONIC SOLUTIONS; HYPOTONIC SOLUTIONS; KIDNEY; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; OSMOSIS; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 84872198744     PISSN: 01674889     EISSN: 18792596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dai J., Ting-Beall H.P., Sheetz M.P. The secretion-coupled endocytosis correlates with membrane tension changes in RBL 2H3 cells. J. Gen. Physiol. 1997, 110:1-10.
2. Apodaca G. Modulation of membrane traffic by mechanical stimuli. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2002, 282:179-190.
3. Sheetz M.P., Dai J. Modulation of membrane dynamics and cell motility by membrane tension. Trends Cell Biol. 1996, 6:85-89.
4. Gauthier N.C., Fardin M.A., Roca-Cusachs P., Sheetz M.P. Temporary increase in plasma membrane tension coordinates the activation of exocytosis and contraction during cell spreading. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108:14467-14472.
5. Raucher D., Sheetz M.P. Cell spreading and lamellipodial extension rate is regulated by membrane tension. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 148:127-136.
6. Raucher D., Sheetz M.P. Membrane expansion increases endocytosis rate during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 144:497-506.
7. Dai J., Sheetz M.P. Membrane tether formation from blebbing cells. Biophys. J. 1999, 77:3363-3370.
8. Groulx N., Boudreault F., Orlov S., Grygorczyk R. Membrane reserves and hypotonic cell swelling. J. Membr. Biol. 2006, 214:43-56.
9. Morris C.E., Homann U. Cell surface area regulation and membrane tension. J. Membr. Biol. 2001, 179:79-102.
10. Kozera L., White E., Calaghan S. Caveolae act as membrane reserves which limit mechanosensitive I(Cl, swell) channel activation during swelling in the rat ventricular myocyte. PLoS One 2009, 4:e8312.
11. Radmacher M., Fritz M., Kacher C.M., Cleveland J.P., Hansma P.K. Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 1996, 70:556-567.
12. Haga H., Sasaki S., Kawabata K., Ito E., Ushiki T., Sambongi T. Elasticity mapping of living fibroblasts by AFM and immunofluorescence observation of the cytoskeleton. Ultramicroscopy 2000, 82:253-258.
13. Sen S., Subramanian S., Discher D.E. Indentation and adhesive probing of a cell membrane with AFM: theoretical model and experiments. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:3203-3213.
14. Yeung A., Evans E. Cortical shell-liquid core model for passive flow of liquid-like spherical cells into micropipets. Biophys. J. 1989, 56:139-149.
15. Lim C.T., Zhou E.H., Quek S.T. Mechanical models for living cells-a review. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:195-216.
16. Rosenbluth M.J., Lam W.A., Fletcher D.A. Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:2994-3003.
17. Waugh R.E., Hochmuth R.M. Mechanical equilibrium of thick, hollow, liquid membrane cylinders. Biophys. J. 1987, 52:391-400.
18. Evans E.A., Skalak R. Mechanics and thermodynamic of biomembranes: Pt. 1 1979.
19. Hochmuth F.M., Shao J.Y., Dai J., Sheetz M.P. Deformation and flow of membrane into tethers extracted from neuronal growth cones. Biophys. J. 1996, 70:358-369.
20. Hochmuth R.M., Marcus W.D. Membrane tethers formed from blood cells with available area and determination of their adhesion energy. Biophys. J. 2002, 82:2964-2969.
21. Steltenkamp S., Rommel C., Wegener J., Janshoff A. Membrane stiffness of animal cells challenged by osmotic stress. Small 2006, 2:1016-1020.
22. Sheetz M.P. Cell control by membrane-cytoskeleton adhesion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2:392-396.
23. Woodward A.M., Crouch D.H. Cellular distributions of the ERM proteins in MDCK epithelial cells: regulation by growth and cytoskeletal integrity. Cell Biol. Int. 2001, 25:205-213.
24. Rawicz W., Olbrich K.C., McIntosh T., Needham D., Evans E. Effect of chain length and unsaturation on elasticity of lipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 2000, 79:328-339.
25. Algrain M., Turunen O., Vaheri A., Louvard D., Arpin M. Ezrin contains cytoskeleton and membrane binding domains accounting for its proposed role as a membrane-cytoskeletal linker. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 120:129-139.
26. Berryman M., Franck Z., Bretscher A. Ezrin is concentrated in the apical microvilli of a wide variety of epithelial cells whereas moesin is found primarily in endothelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 1993, 105:1025-1043.
27. Komaragiri U., Begley M.R., Simmonds J.G. The mechanical response of freestanding circular elastic films under point and pressure loads. J. Appl. Mech. 2005, 72:203-212.
28. Lee C., Wei X., Kysar J.W., Hone J. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 2008, 321:385-388.
29. Radmacher M. Measuring the elastic properties of biological samples with the AFM. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 1997, 16:47-57.
30. Mathur A.B., Collinsworth A.M., Reichert W.M., Kraus W.E., Truskey G.A. Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J. Biomech. 2001, 34:1545-1553.
31. Costa K.D., Yin F.C.P. Analysis of indentation: implications for measuring mechanical properties with atomic force microscopy. J. Biomech. Eng. 1999, 121:462-471.
32. Briscoe B.J., Sebastian K.S., Adams M.J. The effect of indenter geometry on the elastic response to indentation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1994, 27:1156.
33. Lin D.C., Dimitriadis E.K., Horkay F. Robust strategies for automated AFM force curve analysis-II: adhesion-influenced indentation of soft, elastic materials. J. Biomech. Eng. 2007, 129:904-912.
34. Hunter K.W. Ezrin, a key component in tumor metastasis. Trends Mol. Med. 2004, 10:201-204.
35. Guilak F., Erickson G.R., Ting-Beall H.P. The effects of osmotic stress on the viscoelastic and physical properties of articular chondrocytes. Biophys. J. 2002, 82:720-727.
36. Spagnoli C., Beyder A., Besch S., Sachs F. Atomic force microscopy analysis of cell volume regulation. Phys. Rev. E 2008, 78:031916.
37. Kiesel M., Reuss R., Endter J., Zimmermann D., Zimmermann H., Shirakashi R., Bamberg E., Zimmermann U., Sukhorukov V.L. Swelling-activated pathways in human T-lymphocytes studied by cell volumetry and electrorotation. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:4720-4729.
38. Ting-Beall H., Needham D., Hochmuth R. Volume and osmotic properties of human neutrophils. Blood 1993, 81:2774-2780.
39. Brochard-Wyart F., Borghi N., Cuvelier D., Nassoy P. Hydrodynamic narrowing of tubes extruded from cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006, 103:7660-7663.
40. Krieg M., Helenius J., Heisenberg C.P., Muller D.J. A bond for a lifetime: employing membrane nanotubes from living cells to determine receptor-ligand kinetics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47:9775-9777.