Sensitivity of survival to migration routes used by juvenile Chinook salmon to negotiate the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta

Environmental Biology of Fishes

Volumn 96, Issue 2-3, 2013, Pages 381-392

  Perry, Russell W ^a,f   Brandes, Patricia L ^b   Burau, Jon R ^c   Klimley, A Peter ^d   MacFarlane, Bruce ^e   Michel, Cyril ^e   Skalski, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^f WESTERN FISHERIES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Juvenile salmon; Migration; Sacramento San Joaquin Delta; Survival; Telemetry

Indexed keywords

BIOTELEMETRY; EMIGRATION; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; JUVENILE; MIGRATION ROUTE; SALMONID FISHERY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL;

CALIFORNIA; SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 84872186678     PISSN: 03781909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-012-9984-6     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Adams NS, Rondorf DW, Evans SD, Kelly JE, Perry RW (1998) Effects of surgically and gastrically implanted radio transmitters on swimming performance and predator avoidance of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55: 781-787.
2. Bracis C (2010) A model of the ocean migration of Pacific salmon. Thesis, University of Washington.
3. Brandes PL, McLain JS (2001) Juvenile Chinook salmon abundance, distribution, and survival in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary. In: Brown RL (ed) Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids, volume 2, Fish Bulletin 179. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California, pp 39-138.
4. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
5. Coutant CC (2001) Behavioral technologies for fish guidance. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
6. Kostow KE (2004) Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provide evidence for modified selection due to captive breeding. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61: 577-589.
7. Newman KB, Brandes PL (2010) Hierarchical modeling of juvenile Chinook salmon survival as a function of Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water exports. N Am J Fish Manage 30: 157-169.
8. Newman KB, Rice J (2002) Modeling the survival of Chinook salmon smolts outmigrating through the lower Sacramento River system. J Am Stat Assoc 97: 983-993.
9. Perry RW (2010) Survival and migration dynamics of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Dissertation, University of Washington.
10. Perry RW, Brandes PL, Sandstrom PT, Ammann A, MacFarlane B, Klimley AP, Skalski JR (2010) Estimating survival and migration route probabilities of juvenile Chinook salmon in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. N Am J Fish Manage 30: 142-156.
11. Reisenbichler RR, McIntyre JD (1977) Genetic differences in growth and survival of juvenile hatchery and wild steelhead trout, Salmo gairdneri. J Fish Res B Can 34: 123-128.
12. Skalski JR, Townsend R, Lady J, Giorgi AE, Stevenson JR, McDonald RD (2002) Estimating route-specific passage and survival probabilities at a hydroelectric project from smolt radiotelemetry studies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59: 1385-1393.
13. Skalski JR, Buchanan RA, Townsend RL, Steig TW, Hemstrom S (2009) A multiple-release model to estimate route-specific and dam passage survival at a hydroelectric project. N Am J Fish Manage 29: 670-679.